基于模糊AHP-TOPSIS方法的中缅运输路径评价研究
发布时间：2022-05-02 21:08
随着经济全球化和区域化进程的快速发展,全球各个领域的产业都在从供应链和物流的优势中寻求效益比较。中国不仅有世界上最大的制造业,而且向其他发展中国家扩大投资。根据“一带一路”倡议的背景,由于缅甸是连接印度洋与中国西南内陆省份的交汇点,因此对于中国的贸易发展来说缅甸有着重要的战略地位。此外,两国的贸易关系随着2010年中国-东盟自由贸易区的建立而不断发展。根据贸易的强烈需求性和集装箱化在货物运输中的重要作用,有效的多式联运路线成为运输中缅贸易货物的必要条件。为了解决这个问题,首先,本文基于文献综述和物流行业专家意见构建了指标评价体系。因此,成本,时间,可靠性,容量,安全性,多式联运模式连接效率,地缘政治和环境被认为是影响多式联运路线效率的主要因素。其次,本文的重点是通过研究从重庆（中国）到仰光（缅甸）的实证案例研究的所有替代方案,分析40英尺高集装箱运输的七条运输路线。下一步是计算标准的权重并根据不同的偏好排列运输路线。模糊层次分析法用于计算标准权重,TOPSIS用于评估问题,其结果显示了多式联运路线的偏好顺序。采用模糊层次分析法和TOPSIS方法,结合定性和定量数据,从物流服务提供商和托...
【文章页数】：111 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
扩展的摘要
abstract
CHAPTER 1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND
1.1 Significance of Research
1.2 Theoretical Meaning and Applied Value
1.3 Literature Review
1.4 The Scope of the Thesis and Contribution
CHAPTER 2 RELATED THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES
2.1 Concept of Intermodal Transportation
2.2 Transport Mode Characteristics
2.3 Container Transportation
2.4 Fuzzy Logic
2.5 Overview of Multi Criteria Decision Making
2.5.1 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
2.5.2 Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP)
2.5.3 Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)
CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORK BETWEEN CHINA ANDMYANMAR
3.1 Trade Relation between China and Myanmar
3.2 Current Situation of Transportation Network between China and Myanmar
3.2.1 Road Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
3.2.2 Inland Water Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
3.2.3 Railway Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
3.2.4 Sea Transportation
3.2.5 Analysis of Transportation Modes in Myanmar
3.3 Current Situation of China Intermodal Transportation
3.3.1 Shanghai Port
3.3.2 Shenzhen Port
3.3.3 Logistics Network of Chongqing
CHAPTER 4 EVALUATION INDEXES SYSTEM FOR INTERMODALTRANSPORTATION
4.1 Cost
4.2 Time
4.3 Reliability
4.4 Capacity
4.5 Security
4.6 Intermodal Mode Connectivity Efficiency
4.7 Geopolitics
4.8 Environment
CHAPTER 5 ESTABLISHING EVALUATION MODEL OF INTERMODALTRANSPORTATION ROUTES BASED ON FAHP AND TOPSIS
5.1 Evaluation Model Descriptions
5.2 Procedures of Model Phase 1 based on FAHP
5.3 Procedures of Model Phase two based on TOPSIS
CHAPTER 6 CASE STUDIES FOR ANALYSIS OF INTERMODAL ROUTES
6.1 Analysis on Intermodal Routes from Chongqing to Yangon
6.2 Analysis on Criteria's Weights based on FAHP Methodology
6.2.1 Calculation of Weights
6.2.2 Hierarchical Cluster Analysis for Group AHP
6.2.3 Evaluation Results of Criteria's weights
6.3 Prioritization for evaluation of Chongqing-Yangon Transport Routes based on TOPSIS
6.4 Sensitivity Analysis by Changing Criteria Weight
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
Acknowledgements
作者简历及攻读硕士学位期间的科研成果
本文编号：3649964
【文章页数】：111 页
【学位级别】：硕士
【文章目录】：
摘要
扩展的摘要
abstract
CHAPTER 1 RESEARCH BACKGROUND
1.1 Significance of Research
1.2 Theoretical Meaning and Applied Value
1.3 Literature Review
1.4 The Scope of the Thesis and Contribution
CHAPTER 2 RELATED THEORIES AND METHODOLOGIES
2.1 Concept of Intermodal Transportation
2.2 Transport Mode Characteristics
2.3 Container Transportation
2.4 Fuzzy Logic
2.5 Overview of Multi Criteria Decision Making
2.5.1 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
2.5.2 Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP)
2.5.3 Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution(TOPSIS)
CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION NETWORK BETWEEN CHINA ANDMYANMAR
3.1 Trade Relation between China and Myanmar
3.2 Current Situation of Transportation Network between China and Myanmar
3.2.1 Road Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
3.2.2 Inland Water Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
3.2.3 Railway Transportation of Sino-Myanmar
3.2.4 Sea Transportation
3.2.5 Analysis of Transportation Modes in Myanmar
3.3 Current Situation of China Intermodal Transportation
3.3.1 Shanghai Port
3.3.2 Shenzhen Port
3.3.3 Logistics Network of Chongqing
CHAPTER 4 EVALUATION INDEXES SYSTEM FOR INTERMODALTRANSPORTATION
4.1 Cost
4.2 Time
4.3 Reliability
4.4 Capacity
4.5 Security
4.6 Intermodal Mode Connectivity Efficiency
4.7 Geopolitics
4.8 Environment
CHAPTER 5 ESTABLISHING EVALUATION MODEL OF INTERMODALTRANSPORTATION ROUTES BASED ON FAHP AND TOPSIS
5.1 Evaluation Model Descriptions
5.2 Procedures of Model Phase 1 based on FAHP
5.3 Procedures of Model Phase two based on TOPSIS
CHAPTER 6 CASE STUDIES FOR ANALYSIS OF INTERMODAL ROUTES
6.1 Analysis on Intermodal Routes from Chongqing to Yangon
6.2 Analysis on Criteria's Weights based on FAHP Methodology
6.2.1 Calculation of Weights
6.2.2 Hierarchical Cluster Analysis for Group AHP
6.2.3 Evaluation Results of Criteria's weights
6.3 Prioritization for evaluation of Chongqing-Yangon Transport Routes based on TOPSIS
6.4 Sensitivity Analysis by Changing Criteria Weight
CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
REFERENCES
APPENDIX
Acknowledgements
作者简历及攻读硕士学位期间的科研成果
本文编号：3649964
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/kejilunwen/daoluqiaoliang/3649964.html
