价值重建时代传统“孝”文化之再检视

发布时间：2017-12-28 03:37

本文关键词：价值重建时代传统“孝”文化之再检视　出处：《天津社会科学》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：众多论说中国古代之"孝"及其现代意义的文章存在严重的历史误判及文化误判。造成这种现象的重要原因之一是许多学者不知道或没有清晰地认识到"孝"是一个历史范畴。"孝"的本义及核心词义是亲子规范。在诸多历史因素的影响下,亲子规范的属性、内容及形式不断演化,"孝"的适用范围、具体规范及核心价值不断演化,"孝"字的内涵与外延也随之不断演化。受各种主客观性历史因素的影响,"孝"具有普遍性、时代性、地域性、族群性、信仰性、思想性、个体性,等等。在本质属性、思维方式、核心价值、适用范围上,中国古代之"孝"与中国现代之"孝"有根本性的差别。
[Abstract]:Many articles on the ancient Chinese "filial piety" and its modern meaning have serious historical misjudgments and cultural misjudgments. One of the important reasons for this phenomenon is that many scholars do not know or realize that "filial piety" is a historical category. The meaning and core meaning of "filial piety" is the standard of parent-child. Under the influence of many historical factors, the nature, content and form of paternity norms are evolving. The scope, specific norms and core values of filial piety continue to evolve, and the connotation and denotation of filial piety also evolve. Influenced by various subjective and objective historical factors, the "filial piety" is universal, epochal, regional, ethnicity, belief, ideology, individuality, and so on. In the essence, the way of thinking, the core value and the scope of application, the ancient Chinese "filial piety" has a fundamental difference from the Chinese modern "filial piety".
【作者单位】：南开大学中国社会史研究中心暨历史学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“中华优秀传统文化与素质教育研究”(项目号:NKZXB1407)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B823.1
【正文快照】： 众多论说中国古代之“孝”的文章存在严重的历史误判及文化误判。具体表现之一是众多学者将“孝治天下”说成是“儒家”思想,夸大“儒家”的理论贡献。一些人甚至高估“儒家之孝”的现代意义,将“儒家之孝”判定为“优秀传统”,主张将其弘扬于现代中国。这一类说法的致命缺陷

【参考文献】