全球伦理的边界研究

发布时间：2018-03-01 12:04

本文关键词： 全球伦理底线伦理适用范围意识形态伦理回归　出处：《中国矿业大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：德国学者孔汉思提出全球伦理的概念后,全球伦理成为了当今学者反复争论和探讨的话题。之所以会出现分歧,其根本原因是对全球伦理的边界认知模糊,不明确全球伦理的适用范围。全球伦理是一种底线伦理,它所追求的是人类的道德共识。全球伦理不能包含西方政治强权的意识形态,一旦这种政治强权的意识形态介入,全球伦理就会成为某些既得利益者的价值宣传工具,它就不再是能被每个国家所接受和认可的。通过总结西方全球伦理构建的路径方法,表明孔汉思的全球伦理只是西方伦理共识体系思想的一种,并揭示出何时起强权政治介入到了全球伦理的领域,使得全球伦理偏离了它原本的轨道。全球伦理的内在边界在于它的人类关怀,虽然各个国家之间的信仰不同,但是不同信仰的国家都遵循着一个相同的底线——以人性作为普遍的标准。全球伦理是可以构建和实现的,但是政治强权不可以对伦理规范进行干预,越界的强权政治意识形态和价值观必须把它剔除出去,回归伦理道德本身。
[Abstract]:After the German scholar Kong Han put forward the concept of global ethics, global ethics has become a topic of debate and discussion among scholars. The scope of application of global ethics is not clear. Global ethics is a kind of bottom line ethics, what it pursues is the moral consensus of human beings. Global ethics cannot contain the ideology of western political power, once the ideology of political power is involved, Global ethics will become a value advocacy tool for some vested interests, and it will no longer be accepted and recognized by every country. It shows that Kong Hance's global ethics is only one kind of thought of western ethical consensus system, and reveals when power politics has been involved in the field of global ethics. The inner boundary of global ethics lies in its human concern, although different countries have different beliefs. But countries of different faiths follow the same bottom line-human nature is the universal standard. Global ethics can be built and realized, but political might can't interfere with ethical norms. The ideology and values of power politics across the border must be eliminated and returned to ethics itself.
【学位授予单位】：中国矿业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B82-0

【参考文献】