伦理的规范性——黑格尔学说作为康德伦理学的替代性选择

发布时间：2018-03-01 13:18

本文关键词： 道德自主悖谬伦理内在标准制度性规范更替为承认而斗争黑格尔康德　出处：《学习与探索》2014年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在康德的纯建构主义道德理论被指责为抽象形式主义的同时,黑格尔的"新亚里士多德主义"伦理学则被指责为纯粹保守主义。可以用后形而上学方式重构黑格尔伦理构想,从而提出如下问题进行思考:黑格尔伦理内在标准模型所包含的理论要素,如果没有客观主义历史哲学之先决条件,是否也能指出道德自由意识进步的可能?或者说,如果没有自我实在化的精神之先决条件,历史中是否也存在着道德进步?黑格尔伦理构想内含着的历史动力要素,是否不能提供足够的立足点?由此得出的结论是,伦理的历史可以被思考为制度性规范的更替;"为承认而斗争"既是行为者历史的中介,又在伦理领域中推动道德进步。
[Abstract]:In Kant's pure moral constructivism theory was accused of abstract formalism at the same time, Hagel's "new Aristotle doctrine" ethics is being blamed for the pure conservatism. Can be used after the reconstruction of metaphysics of Hagel's ethical ideas, so as to put forward the following problems in the theory of Hagel's ethical thinking: elements of internal standard model contains, if not objectivism historical philosophy is a prerequisite, is also pointed out that the awareness of moral freedom progress possible? Or, if there is no self is the spirit of the prerequisite, whether there is a history of moral progress? History contains the dynamic factors of Hagel's ethical conception, whether cannot provide enough so that the starting point? The conclusion is that the history of ethics can be thought as the institutional norms change; "struggle for recognition" is the history of the actors in the intermediary. Ethical progress is promoted in the field of ethics.

【作者单位】：法兰克福大学哲学系;法兰克福大学社会研究所;国际黑格尔协会;法兰克福大学哲学系暨社会研究所;复旦大学哲学学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“从批判理论到后批判理论” 国家留学基金公派高级研究学者项目复旦大学人文基金学术交流计划项目
【分类号】：B516.31;B82-091

【相似文献】