纳米技术伦理问题研究的几种进路

发布时间：2018-04-22 19:47

本文选题：纳米技术 + 伦理学　；参考：《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年01期

【摘要】：从伦理学方法与理论背景的视角来看纳米技术伦理问题,大体有四种研究进路:一,将伦理学还原为一种"恐惧的启示",并以此为导向反思什么是人类真正珍视的东西,呼吁中止纳米技术的研究;二,将伦理学还原为后果主义的评估和计算,将对伦理问题的研究看作是风险与利益的核算以及人类是否愿意接受这些风险的问题;三,将纳米技术放到特定的社会文化语境中,试图打开纳米技术发展的"黑箱",揭示技术与社会之间的密切关系,以求更好地理解纳米技术与社会文化价值观等的互动;四,提出伦理学要发挥主动引导而不是被动评价的作用,通过构建一个动态的、具有可行性的行动框架,参与纳米技术的社会建构。本文通过对纳米技术伦理问题研究方法的分析,进一步指出传统伦理学在高技术社会背景下的局限,提出高科技伦理的新的特征、意义和作用机制。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of ethical methods and theoretical background, there are generally four ways to study ethical issues of nanotechnology: first, to restore ethics to a "revelation of fear", and to reflect on what is truly cherished by mankind. Calling for the suspension of nanotechnology research; second, the assessment and calculation of ethics as a matter of consequence, the study of ethical issues as an accounting of risks and benefits and the willingness of mankind to accept these risks; and third, In order to better understand the interaction between nanotechnology and social and cultural values, nanotechnology is put into a specific socio-cultural context to open up the "black box" of nanotechnology development and reveal the close relationship between technology and society. It is suggested that ethics should play the role of active guidance rather than passive evaluation and participate in the social construction of nanotechnology by constructing a dynamic and feasible framework of action. This paper points out the limitation of traditional ethics under the background of hi-tech society through the analysis of the research methods of ethics of nanotechnology, and puts forward the new characteristics, significance and mechanism of the ethics of high technology.
【作者单位】：大连理工大学哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目(12&ZD117) 国家重点基础研究发展计划973项目(2011CB933401)阶段性成果
【分类号】：TB383.1;B82-05

【参考文献】