道德概念净脏隐喻及其对道德判断的影响

发布时间：2018-04-23 21:24

本文选题：概念隐喻 + 净脏　；参考：《心理发展与教育》2017年06期

【摘要】：通过3个实验考察道德概念净脏隐喻的心理现实性以及道德概念净脏背景和净脏自身隐喻对道德判断的影响及其差异。结果表明:(1)道德概念净脏隐喻具有心理现实性,即被试在洁净背景上判断道德词的反应时更快,在肮脏背景上判断不道德词的反应时更快。(2)当将道德两难故事呈现在肮脏背景上时,相比于呈现在洁净背景上,被试更容易将故事主人公的行为判断为不道德,表现出隐喻一致性效应。(3)相比于肮脏自身启动,被试在洁净自身启动下对道德两难故事主人公的行为判断为更加不道德,表现出隐喻补偿性效应。(4)相比于洁净背景启动,被试在洁净自身启动下对道德两难故事的判断更加严厉;相比于肮脏背景启动,被试在肮脏自身启动下对道德两难故事的判断更加宽松。研究结果证明,道德概念净脏隐喻具有心理现实性,净脏背景和净脏自身隐喻均影响个体的道德判断,并且二者对道德判断的影响不同。
[Abstract]:Through three experiments, the psychological reality of net dirty metaphor of moral concept and the influence and difference of the background of net dirty of moral concept and its own metaphor on moral judgment were investigated. The result shows that the pure dirty metaphor of moral concept has psychological reality, that is, the subjects can judge the reaction of moral words in the clean background more quickly. When the moral dilemma is presented in the dirty context, subjects are more likely to judge the hero's behavior as immoral than in the clean context. It shows that the metaphorical consistency effect is more immoral than the dirty self-priming, and the behavior judgment of the protagonist in the moral dilemma story under the clean self-priming is more immoral, and the metaphorical compensatory effect is shown in the metaphorical compensation effect .Y4) compared with the clean background priming. The subjects were more strict in judging moral dilemmas under the priming of clean themselves, and were more relaxed in judging moral dilemmas under the initiation of dirty background than in the dirty background. The results show that the net dirty metaphor of the moral concept has psychological reality, and the background of the net dirty and the net dirty self metaphor both affect the individual's moral judgment, and the two have different influence on the moral judgment.
【作者单位】：宁夏大学教育学院;安康职业技术学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(31560285) 教育部人文社会科学研究西部与边疆项目(13XJA190001)
【分类号】：B82-054

【相似文献】