“复合平等”还是“复合不平等”——对沃尔泽多元主义分配正义论的追问

发布时间：2018-05-14 13:00

本文选题：沃尔泽 + 多元主义分配正义论　；参考：《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：迈克尔·沃尔泽以多元主义分配正义论及其"复合平等"而闻名于世。他主张根据由不同社群的"文化语境"即"共享理解"所决定的"善的社会意义"来分配不同领域的善,从而让各个领域的"不平等"叠加在一起进而形成"复合平等"。通过将沃尔泽多元主义分配正义论及其平等主张分别与马克思、罗尔斯、诺齐克的分配正义论及其平等主张进行比较,可以得知,沃尔泽在"平等"问题上与马克思是渐行渐远的;与罗尔斯是形似神异的;与诺齐克是殊途同归的,即沃尔泽多元主义分配正义论所推崇和追求的"复合平等"最终走进了诺齐克的"不平等"轨道。沃尔泽多元主义分配正义论的"复合平等"实质上是"复合不平等"。
[Abstract]:Michael Walzer is famous for his pluralistic distributive justice theory and his compound equality. He advocated the distribution of good in different fields according to the "cultural context" of different communities, that is, the social meaning of "good" determined by "shared understanding", so that the "inequality" in various fields could be superimposed to form "composite equality". By comparing Walzer's pluralistic distributive justice theory and its equality proposition with Marx, Rawls and Nozick's distributional justice theory and their equal claims, we can know that Walzer was far away from Marx on the question of equality; unlike Rawls in the form of God; and Nozick in the same way. That is, the "compound equality" advocated and pursued by Walzer's pluralistic distributive justice theory finally walked into Nozick's "inequality" track. Walzer's pluralistic distributive justice theory of "compound equality" is essentially "compound inequality".
【作者单位】：东南大学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“生态文明建设的协同治理与动态推进研究”(15CKS014) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(东南大学新进教师科研启动费)资助项目“沃尔泽多元主义分配正义论及其对中国的启示研究”(3213006208)
【分类号】：B82-05

【相似文献】