阐释与转化:“忠孝”观念的现代解读
[Abstract]:In his later years, Sun Zhongshan reinterpreted the three people's principles, advocated the restoration of Chinese inherent morality and made a modern interpretation of it, which laid down the basic attitude of the Kuomintang towards the Chinese inherent morality, including "loyalty and filial piety". After the outbreak of the War of Resistance against Japan, Jiang Jieshi and the Nationalists, while raising the banner of nationalism, explained the inherent morality of China, including "loyalty and filial piety" in wartime. The modern Neo-Confucianism, the warring States policy party Chinese traditional morals has carried on the thorough exploration, tries to make the "loyal filial piety" the concept to be suitable for the times the new explanation. KMT stresses loyalty to the country and filial piety to the nation, emphasizing loyalty to the KMT and its leaders. The Neo-Confucianism expounded the relationship between the concept of loyalty and filial piety and the family system, paid attention to the change of its connotation, attached importance to loyalty and filial piety, and emphasized loyalty to the nation-state. He Lin's explanation of the traditional "five Lun" concept, Feng Youlan's analysis of "loyalty and filial piety", and Liang Shuming's and Xie Youwei's explanation of the relationship between filial piety and Chinese culture are more prominent. The warring States Policy School, represented by Lin Tongji, systematically studied the traditional Chinese concept of "loyalty and filial piety" from the point of view of the so-called "the world in the great political age", and not only made a new interpretation of the connotation of "loyalty and filial piety" in accordance with the needs of wartime. Moreover, the author openly puts forward the view that loyalty is the first, and emphasizes the principle of "filial piety after loyalty, filial piety before filial piety", and advocates expanding the scope of loyalty and limiting "filial piety" to the family. It is an important way for Chinese traditional moral modernization to explain the concept of loyalty and filial piety and promote its modern transformation. Thus, as the core of Confucian ethics, the concept of "loyalty and filial piety" obtains the opportunity of creative transformation in the pluralistic modern interpretation.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院近代史研究所;河南大学;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目(16KZD021)
【分类号】:B82-092;D693.0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高武全;;冯友兰的道德观研究[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2011年05期
2 杨国荣;人生理想的理性建构——论冯友兰的人生哲学[J];南京社会科学;1992年01期
3 杨权利,李建森;简析中国传统道德的宽恕思想及其现实意义[J];华夏文化;2000年02期
4 杨海文;《德性源流——中国传统道德转型研究》介评[J];江海学刊;2005年05期
5 吴圣正;中国传统道德的特性及其现代转化[J];船山学刊;2005年02期
6 关健英;;怎样认识中国传统道德中的“和”[J];红旗文稿;2006年18期
7 张怀承;;论中国传统道德的诚信精神及其现代意义[J];道德与文明;2007年02期
8 关健英;;怎样认识中国传统道德中的“和”[J];理论参考;2007年02期
9 周辅成;中国传统道德中的三个特征[J];冶金政工研究;1994年05期
10 王颖;中国传统道德研究的新探索——评《中国传统道德举要》[J];道德与文明;1997年04期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 陈德荣;;冯友兰整体主义社会伦理观雏论[A];传统与创新——第四届冯友兰学术思想研讨会论文集[C];2000年
2 方丽春;邵汉明;;中国传统道德的现代化研究[A];吉林省行政管理学会“政府管理创新与转变经济发展方式”学术年会论文集(《吉林政报》2010·专刊2)[C];2011年
3 林滨;;以诚信为视角,透视中国传统道德在当代的承继与发展[A];海峡两岸道德发展论[C];2008年
4 覃勇;;从传统与现代差别看道德的继承和扬弃[A];2003年“求实、创新、发展——面向新世纪的广西精神文明建设”理论研讨会论文集[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 徐柏才 狄奥;谈谈中国传统道德的现代转换[N];光明日报;2006年
2 陈泽环 上海师范大学中国传统思想研究所暨哲学学院;学会说中国传统道德话语[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 秦海珍;冯友兰道德修养思想研究[D];中南大学;2004年
2 范文文;论中国传统道德信仰[D];广西民族大学;2012年
,本文编号:2159745
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2159745.html