论“义”在传统道德价值体系中的融通性
发布时间:2018-12-12 14:02
【摘要】:"义"在我国传统道德价值体系中的阶位是相对的。鉴于"义"所特有的关于正当性、适宜性原则的规范要求,它与其他诸德有着极强的融通性。"义"与"道"融通生成"道义",与"德"融通生成"德义",与"仁"融通生成"仁义",与"礼"融通生成"礼义",与"公"融通生成"公义",与"理"融通生成"理义",与"忠"融通生成"忠义",与"利"融通生成"利义",与"孝"融通生成"孝义",与"正"融通生成"正义",等等。考察"义"与其他诸德的融通性,有助于今人正确把握正义在社会主义核心价值观系统中的位阶和融通性,防止狭隘地理解正义道德价值范畴及其适用域。
[Abstract]:The order of righteousness in Chinese traditional moral value system is relative. In view of the normative requirements of the principle of legitimacy and appropriateness, righteousness has a strong compatibility with other virtues. " "righteousness" and "Tao" form "morality", "morality" with "virtue", "benevolence" with "benevolence", "propriety" with "propriety", "justice" with "public". "reason", "loyalty", "benefit", "filial piety" and "righteousness", "justice" and "justice" are formed by blending with "reason", "loyalty" and "loyalty", "benefit", "filial piety", "justice" and so on. It is helpful for people to correctly grasp the rank and compatibility of justice in the socialist core value system and to prevent narrow understanding of the category of justice moral value and its application domain.
【作者单位】: 天津师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】:天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJZX15-006)
【分类号】:B82-0
本文编号:2374707
[Abstract]:The order of righteousness in Chinese traditional moral value system is relative. In view of the normative requirements of the principle of legitimacy and appropriateness, righteousness has a strong compatibility with other virtues. " "righteousness" and "Tao" form "morality", "morality" with "virtue", "benevolence" with "benevolence", "propriety" with "propriety", "justice" with "public". "reason", "loyalty", "benefit", "filial piety" and "righteousness", "justice" and "justice" are formed by blending with "reason", "loyalty" and "loyalty", "benefit", "filial piety", "justice" and so on. It is helpful for people to correctly grasp the rank and compatibility of justice in the socialist core value system and to prevent narrow understanding of the category of justice moral value and its application domain.
【作者单位】: 天津师范大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】:天津市哲学社会科学规划项目(TJZX15-006)
【分类号】:B82-0
【参考文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 黑龙江大学哲学学院 桑东辉;[N];中国社会科学报;2015年
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李德春;三种社会道德价值体系性质评价[J];湖北社会科学;1995年10期
2 彭定光;申强杰;胡国平;;论道德效力及其表征[J];中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
3 林理玲;关于建构科学道德价值体系的思考[J];岭南学刊;2003年01期
4 柯木火;事实和趋势:公民个人独立性和个人主体价值的确立和强化[J];学术研究;1995年02期
5 张树俊;对构建新型道德价值体系的思考[J];唯实;2000年02期
6 陈超;;中西“四德”的价值诠释——中西道德比较与现代道德重建[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2006年04期
7 卢昌德;中国行为礼仪论考[J];湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1998年01期
8 卢昌德;中国古代行为礼仪试探[J];社会科学战线;1997年05期
9 张月娥;;论分析[J];法语学习;2010年01期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 李志勇 万芬;社会“软”、“硬”控制机制应均衡发展[N];社会科学报;2001年
2 徐风;想象的秩序[N];吉林日报;2007年
3 王久侠;兴隆奏响和谐文化主旋律[N];承德日报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 申强杰;论道德效力[D];湖南师范大学;2012年
,本文编号:2374707
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/falvlunlilunwen/2374707.html