假释制度探析

发布时间：2018-05-28 13:33

本文选题：假释制度 + 行刑社会化　；参考：《华东政法学院》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 在现代刑罚制度中,假释无疑是一种重要的刑罚执行制度。“假释是人犯自改过机关释放后而仍受改过当局管束的办法。他是被放回到社会去,但同时仍受严密监视,以便查考他是否可以住在自由社会里毋须监视。假释的目的在于使罪犯回到社会后能成其中重要分子。笔者通过对刑罚的目的进行探究入手,阐述假释制度的起源、发展和世界行刑发展趋势,认为假释制度是符合刑罚的目的,符合刑罚的进化趋势,尤其在世界行刑方式由监禁刑向行刑社会化发展的过程中,假释制度是一种更加文明的行刑方式,假释制度也是当前非犯罪化、非刑罚化、非监禁化趋势的必然选择。通过对我国假释制度执行现状的分析可以看到当前我国假释制度存在着适用比例偏低、适用条件过于原则和笼统,执法不平衡、程序不规范、考察现状不容乐观等问题。分析原因,笔者认为是由于我国假释制度的事先审查和预后保障的法律不够完备,假释的现有立法规定不合理,假释制度运行机制不畅通,对假释对象的考核等技术手段落后等造成的。因此,必须进一步探索,改革和完善我国的假释制度。一要转变观念,中国传统有重刑主义的观念,人们对刑罚尤其是死刑和监禁刑的威慑功能寄予厚望,这使得行刑社会化的推行受到极大的限制,如欲松动假释的适用,提高假释率,关键要改变整个司法系统过于保守的行刑观念,树立新的、适应时代发展的刑罚思想观念。二要加强假释立法,构建完备的立法、科学的裁量机制和健全的执法体系是推动假释的当务之急。三要完善社区矫正。因为社区矫正的缺失也是当前中国假释如此之低的重要原因,我们可以借鉴国外一些社区矫正开展较好的国家的成功经验,加快社区矫正的建设,发挥社区矫正的作用。四要强化检察监督。检察机关是国家的法律监督机关,担负着监督职责。由于立法的不完善,程序不规范,当前假释工作中中出现一些执法不公甚至贪赃枉法、循私舞弊的现象,必须加强监督。笔者试从理论和实践上对假释制度进行思考,探索符合现代社会发展趋势的刑罚执行制度。
[Abstract]:In the modern penalty system, parole is undoubtedly an important penalty execution system. "Parole is a way for a prisoner to remain under the control of the authorities after he has been released from the reformatory authorities. He was put back into society, but kept under close surveillance to see if he could live in a free society. The purpose of parole is to enable criminals to become important elements when they return to society. By exploring the purpose of punishment, the author expounds the origin, development and the development trend of parole system in the world. The author thinks that parole system accords with the purpose of punishment and the evolution trend of penalty. Especially in the process of the world execution from imprisonment to execution socialization, parole system is a more civilized execution, parole system is also the current non-criminal, non-penal, non-custodial trend of the inevitable choice. Through the analysis of the current situation of parole system in our country, we can see that the current parole system in our country has some problems, such as low proportion of application, excessive principle and general application conditions, unbalanced law enforcement, irregular procedure, and so on. Based on the analysis of the reasons, the author thinks that the laws on the prior examination of parole system and the guarantee of prognosis in our country are not complete, the existing legislation on parole is unreasonable, and the operating mechanism of parole system is not smooth. The examination of parole objects and other technical means of lagging behind, and so on. Therefore, we must further explore, reform and improve our parole system. First, we should change our concept. Chinese tradition has the concept of heavy punishment, and people have high hopes for the deterrent function of punishment, especially the death penalty and imprisonment. This makes the implementation of socialization of execution greatly restricted, such as the application of parole. To improve parole rate, the key is to change the whole judicial system too conservative concept of execution, set up a new concept of punishment to adapt to the development of the times. Second, it is urgent to strengthen parole legislation, build complete legislation, scientific discretion mechanism and sound law enforcement system. Third, improve community correction. Because the lack of community correction is also an important reason why parole is so low in China at present, we can learn from the successful experience of some foreign countries to speed up the construction of community correction and play the role of community correction. Fourth, we should strengthen procuratorial supervision. The procuratorial organ is the legal supervision organ of the state, and bears the supervisory duty. Because the legislation is imperfect and the procedure is not standard, there are some phenomena of unfair law enforcement and even corruption in parole work, so the supervision must be strengthened. The author tries to think about the parole system in theory and practice, and to explore the penalty execution system which accords with the development trend of modern society.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：D926.8

【相似文献】