警察滥用行政强制措施内部防范机制研究
[Abstract]:Administrative coercive measures are indispensable means and measures often used by the police in order to achieve effective administrative management, and play a very important role in the realization of the administrative purpose of the police. Especially in the case of the need for the cooperation of the administrative counterpart but the lack of cooperation of the administrative counterpart, the police are given compulsory power to ensure the realization of the administrative purpose. However, in the real environment, the implementation effect of police administrative coercive measures is not satisfactory, police violations of legislative purposes and procedural provisions are seen in the newspaper from time to time, and sometimes lead to administrative litigation. To some extent, the abuse of administrative coercive measures by police organizations has become a "disaster area" of police power abuse, and even administrative power abuse. The compulsory measure of police administration is to sacrifice or limit the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart in exchange for the realization of the administrative purpose of the police. Therefore, once abused, it will cause great damage to the rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, social harmony and the process of legalization in our country. There is a contradiction here: on the one hand, the coercive measures of police administration play a great role in the process of police administration; on the other hand, they are extremely easy to be abused and do occur all kinds of abuse in reality; Therefore, how to carry out the compulsory measures of police administration legally and accurately to meet the requirements of administration according to law is a problem in front of police organizations at present. Although we are pleased to see that China finally adopted the Administrative compulsory Law of the people's Republic of China at the 21st session of the standing Committee of the 11th National people's Congress on June 30, 2011, at the same time, we should also be soberly aware of the fact that, Because the law is recently passed, the police sometimes can not be used accurately in the process of implementation, and even some places continue to follow the previous practice of non-standard, which brings great confusion to the implementation of administrative coercive measures. The problems of illegal law enforcement, abuse of administrative coercive measures and confusion and application of other administrative measures are particularly prominent, which seriously affect the normal play of the function of police administrative coercive measures. In view of this, this paper takes close to the police practice as the purpose, takes the abuse as the breakthrough point, on the basis of comparing the connotation of the police administrative coercive measures between our country and the foreign countries, through the classification and analysis of some real cases in the police practice. This paper sums up that the current police organizations are prone to abuse of administrative coercive measures and finds out the reasons behind the abuse of administrative coercive measures by the police. On this basis, drawing lessons from the achievements and experience of foreign countries in preventing the abuse of administrative coercive measures by the police, while confirming the effect of external prevention and control, the focus will be focused on the internal prevention and control point of view, from the improvement of the incentive mechanism. This paper puts forward some ideas and suggestions on preventing the abuse of police administrative coercive measures in our country from three aspects: strengthening training and strengthening the supervision of internal institutions. This paper attempts to draw attention to the abuse of administrative coercive measures by the police in order to arouse attention and research on the abuse of administrative coercive measures by the police, which is helpful to prevent the abuse of administrative coercive measures by the police.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D922.14;D631.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 彭贵才;;论我国警察权行使的法律规制[J];当代法学;2009年04期
2 姜明安;;法律规范行政强制行为的意义和途径[J];法学家;2006年03期
3 李健和;;论我国警察权力的属性和类别——警察权力专题研究之一[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
4 王红艳;唐国栋;;论规范公安行政强制措施的立法[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
5 沈晶;;浅析公安行政强制的法理基础[J];公安研究;2006年07期
6 颜军;段海龙;;公安行政强制措施的外延研究[J];甘肃行政学院学报;2008年04期
7 罗智勇;;论我国强制措施的性质及其与人权保障的关系[J];湖湘论坛;2006年04期
8 崔卓兰;行政奖励若干问题初探[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1996年05期
9 刘姗姗;;中法警察教育培训之比较[J];吉林公安高等专科学校学报;2006年05期
10 郭莉,曹慧丽;浅谈强制戒毒的几个问题[J];江西公安专科学校学报;2003年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 崔进文;警察行政权的失范及其控制[D];苏州大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 李正元;论公安行政强制措施的法律控制[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
2 吴大勇;警察行政强制措施研究[D];苏州大学;2004年
3 张力;公安行政强制措施的现状思考[D];华东政法学院;2005年
4 梁秀波;试论警察行政强制措施[D];中国政法大学;2006年
5 张恒;国家公务员激励机制研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2007年
6 韩敏;法治视野下中国警察权的失范与规制问题研究[D];兰州大学;2007年
7 王玉萍;我国公务员激励机制存在的问题及对策研究[D];山东大学;2008年
8 张江峰;警察权滥用的法理学思考[D];中南民族大学;2008年
9 张守强;对警察行政强制措施问题的思考[D];苏州大学;2008年
本文编号:2480769
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2480769.html