论中国对国际规范的塑造——以“保护的责任”为例

发布时间：2018-04-23 16:01

本文选题：国际规范 + 保护的责任　；参考：《国际观察》2017年06期

【摘要】："保护的责任"被写入《2005年世界首脑会议成果》标志着这一规范的制度化,但这并不意味着各国对其付诸实施的支持。由于"保护的责任"规范被制度化后,在其履行的阶段遭遇了程序性和实质性的争论,因此本文认为,"保护的责任"规范的兴起和制度化是一个不断演进的过程,其履行也是国际规范扩散的必要步骤,它与制度化是一个连续谱系,两者共同推动这项规范的扩散。作为一个新兴大国,中国不仅积极参与了"保护的责任"规范演进的三个阶段,而且在强烈反对西方"人道主义干预"的同时,扮演着建构和实施"保护的责任"规范的建设性角色。中国所倡导的构建"保护的责任"规范的战略实现了中国的全球治理理念与国际规范塑造的相互对接,这也是着眼于人类的共同利益和长远利益而提出的中国方案。
[Abstract]:The inclusion of the "responsibility to protect" in the 2005 World Summit outcome marked the institutionalization of that norm, but that did not mean support for its implementation. Since the norms of "responsibility to protect" have been systematized and met with procedural and substantive disputes in the stage of their implementation, this paper argues that the rise and institutionalization of the norm of "responsibility to protect" is a process of continuous evolution. Its implementation is also a necessary step in the diffusion of international norms. It is a continuous pedigree with institutionalization, both of which promote the diffusion of international norms. As an emerging power, China not only actively participated in the three stages of the evolution of the "responsibility to protect" norm, but also strongly opposed "humanitarian intervention" in the West. Play a constructive role in the construction and implementation of the "responsibility to protect" norms. The strategy of "responsibility to protect" advocated by China realizes the mutual connection between the concept of global governance of China and the shaping of international norms, which is also a Chinese plan based on the common and long-term interests of mankind.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学中国法治战略研究中心;
【分类号】：D820

【相似文献】