“制衡”难题:冷战后对美国制衡缺位的再思考

发布时间：2018-05-22 14:44

本文选题：均势 + 制衡缺位　；参考：《太平洋学报》2017年11期

【摘要】：冷战结束至今有关对美制衡缺位的问题,引发学术界对传统的均势理论和"制衡"行为本身进行不断地更为深入的研究。关于对美制衡缺位的解释,目前具有代表性的观点有权力差距说、威胁制衡论、制度和观念作用论、潜在制衡者之间的集体行动困境及其国内因素说等。基于目前学术界各种不同的解释,本文试图从"制衡"行为本身,即制衡的条件、制衡的起源、制衡的障碍和美国的反制衡战略角度,对既有观点予以重新解读。制衡的条件关注的是传统均势理论中权力失衡的限度;制衡的起源关注的是制衡者要制衡的对象并非传统均势理论所说的权力而是被制衡对象所带来的威胁;在对制衡的障碍论述中,集体行动困境关注的是"制衡者"理性行为体假定的有限性,国内因素说关注的是"制衡者"作为单一国家行为体假定的有限性;反制衡战略则是从"被制衡对象"作为能动行为体的角度出发,探究其通过利用上述导致制衡缺位的机制如何规避制衡。
[Abstract]:Since the end of the Cold War, the lack of checks and balances on the United States has caused the academic circles to study the traditional balance of power theory and the "balance of power" behavior itself. As to the explanation of the absence of checks and balances in the United States, the current representative views are power gap theory, threat check and balance theory, system and concept function theory, collective action dilemma among potential checks and balances and the theory of domestic factors and so on. Based on the different interpretations in academic circles, this paper attempts to reinterpret the existing viewpoints from the perspective of "checks and balances" itself, namely, the conditions of checks and balances, the origin of checks and balances, the obstacles of checks and balances and the counterbalance strategies of the United States. The conditions of checks and balances focus on the limits of power imbalance in the traditional balance of power theory, and the origin of checks and balances focuses on the object of checks and balances, which is not the power mentioned in the traditional balance of power theory, but the threat brought by the objects of checks and balances. In the discussion of the obstacles of checks and balances, the dilemma of collective action concerns the limitation of the assumption of "checks and balances" rational actors, and the theory of domestic factors focuses on the limitation of "checks and balances" as a single state actor. The counterbalance strategy is to explore how to evade the checks and balances by using the mechanism mentioned above, from the point of view of "the subject under checks and balances" as the active actors.
【作者单位】：南开大学;
【基金】：2013年国家社科基金重大项目“中国构建新型大国关系的实践探索研究”(13&ZD049)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D871.2

【相似文献】