全球治理、人的流动与人类命运共同体

发布时间：2018-06-04 16:38

本文选题：全球治理 + 人的流动　；参考：《世界经济与政治》2017年01期

【摘要】：结构失衡和文明冲突是全球治理面临的两大挑战。人的流动或许是解开两大挑战的钥匙。人的流动的长期发展可以使得发达国家和发展中国家之间的发展要素相对均等化,同时促进发达国家和发展中国家的发展。另外,基于人的流动的交流和对话可以在一定程度上消解文明的对立和冲突。在全球范围的人的流动中,中国人的流动在其中的作用越来越显著。未来的国家和城市在应对全球范围人的流动时应做好三大平衡:人口流入和人口流出之间的平衡、内部利益与外来利益之间的平衡、强势群体和弱势群体之间的平衡。真正意义的人类命运共同体建立在人的充分流动基础之上。人类命运共同体的整体特征是合作共赢、平等协商、互联互通、包容共鉴、公正合理。人类命运共同体的核心要义是人的自由流动和发展要素分布的均等化。中国提出的"一带一路"建设为这种自由流动和要素均等化提供了物质基础,而二十国集团机制的发展有助于人类命运共同体走向公正合理。
[Abstract]:Structural imbalance and clash of civilizations are two major challenges to global governance. Human mobility may be the key to solving two major challenges. The long-term development of human mobility can make the development elements between developed and developing countries relatively equal, while promoting the development of developed and developing countries. In addition, communication and dialogue based on human mobility can, to some extent, dispel the antagonism and conflict of civilizations. In the global movement of people, the role of Chinese mobility is becoming more and more significant. Countries and cities in the future should do a good job in dealing with the movement of people on a global scale: the balance between the inflow and outflow of population, the balance between internal and external interests, and the balance between the strong group and the weak group. The real community of human destiny is based on the full flow of human beings. The overall characteristics of the community of human destiny are win-win cooperation, equal consultation, interconnection, tolerance and common learning, justice and reasonableness. The core of the community of human destiny is the free flow of human beings and the equalization of the distribution of development elements. The construction of "Belt and Road" proposed by China provides the material basis for this kind of free flow and the equalization of elements, and the development of the G20 mechanism is helpful to the development of the community of human destiny towards justice and reasonableness.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学政治学研究院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“全面推进依法治国与国家治理现代化研究”(项目编号:14AZD113) 华东政法大学政治学研究院“华与罗世界文明与比较政治研究项目”(项目编号:HDZ005)的资助
【分类号】：C922;D81

【相似文献】