香港反腐败历程中“局部特赦”原因探析

发布时间：2018-06-20 18:32

本文选题：香港廉政公署 + 局部特赦　；参考：《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年01期

【摘要】：香港反腐败历程当中戏剧性地颁布"局部特赦令",一般都归因于警务人员对廉政公署反腐败执法的反弹。但警、廉冲突只是直接原因和具体表象,局部特赦的根本原因在于对零容忍原则下强力反腐所激起的更深层次、更广范围的冲突。这种冲突不仅来自警察系统尤其是基层警务人员,还包含其他部门的基层公务员、工商界甚至普通市民,不仅涉及腐败行为,更是直接挑战传统腐败习俗。局部特赦实质上是对政府与社会当中既往各种小腐败、普遍盛行的习惯性腐败行为一体惩处的划断性了结,而非对于严重腐败罪行的妥协与退让。
[Abstract]:The dramatic partial amnesty in Hong Kong's anti-corruption history is generally attributed to police officers' reaction to the ICAC's anti-corruption law enforcement. But the police, the incorruptible conflict is only the direct cause and the concrete appearance, the fundamental reason of partial amnesty lies in the deeper and wider conflict caused by the strong anti-corruption under the principle of zero tolerance. This kind of conflict not only comes from the police system, especially the basic police personnel, but also includes the grass-roots civil servants of other departments, the business circles and even the ordinary citizens, not only involves the corrupt behavior, but also directly challenges the traditional corrupt custom. In essence, partial amnesty is not compromise and concession to the serious corruption crime, but to the government and the society in fact to punish all kinds of small corruption in the past, the common prevailing habitual corruption behavior in a body of punishment, but not the compromise and the concession to the serious corruption crime.
【作者单位】：湖南大学廉政研究中心;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“香港反腐败经验的适用性研究”(编号:13YJAZH124)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D676.58

【相似文献】