复称三段论初探
发布时间：2019-05-22 07:56
【摘要】：正 由古希腊亚里士多德首创的直言三段论理论,系统地讨论了由“所有S是P”、“所有S不是P”、“有的S是P”、“有的S不是P”这类标准形式直言命题为前提而构成的标准三段论式,但却对包含“多数S是P”、“多数S不是P”这类非标准形式直言命题前提的三段论式存而不论。这未免是传统逻辑三段论理论的一个缺陷。我们把“多数S是P”、“多数S不是P”这类非标准形式直言命题称做复称命题,以区别于作为标准形式直言命题的全称命题和特称命题,并把含有复称命题前提的直言三段论称做复
[Abstract]:The theory of outspoken syllogism, pioneered by Aristotle of ancient Greece, systematically discusses the theory of "all S is P", "all S is not P", and "some S is P". "some S is not P", which is based on the standard formal outspoken proposition, but it does not exist for the non-standard form such as "most S is P" and "most S is not P", which is the premise of non-standard form straightforward propositions such as "most S is P" and "most S is not P", which is based on the premise of standard formal outspoken propositions such as "most S is P" and "most S is not P". This is a defect of the traditional logical syllogism theory. We call the non-standard formal outspoken propositions such as "majority S is P" and "majority S not P" as complex propositions, which are different from the full and special propositions as standard forms of outspoken propositions. And make a reply to the straight three paragraphs containing the premise of the complex title proposition.
【分类号】：B812
[Abstract]:The theory of outspoken syllogism, pioneered by Aristotle of ancient Greece, systematically discusses the theory of "all S is P", "all S is not P", and "some S is P". "some S is not P", which is based on the standard formal outspoken proposition, but it does not exist for the non-standard form such as "most S is P" and "most S is not P", which is the premise of non-standard form straightforward propositions such as "most S is P" and "most S is not P", which is based on the premise of standard formal outspoken propositions such as "most S is P" and "most S is not P". This is a defect of the traditional logical syllogism theory. We call the non-standard formal outspoken propositions such as "majority S is P" and "majority S not P" as complex propositions, which are different from the full and special propositions as standard forms of outspoken propositions. And make a reply to the straight three paragraphs containing the premise of the complex title proposition.
【分类号】：B812
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周光明;三段论的“E、I”检验方法[J];渝州大学学报(自然科学版);1997年02期
2 马养新;关于三段论一般规则存在依据的思考[J];陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年01期
3 吕正春;具体三段论的简化欧拉图判定方法探索[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年05期
4 冯必扬;试论我国古代哲学家未能发现三段论的原因[J];哲学研究;1993年08期
5 周光明;三段论的“E、I”检验方法[J];渝州大学学报(社会科学版);1994年01期
6 程仲棠;引入负名词的三段论系统[J];学术研究;1999年03期
7 张春香;谈三段论的基本规则及应用[J];濮阳教育学院学报;2001年02期
8 王志辉;试析三段论推理的五种检验方法[J];思维与智慧;1994年04期
9 于德礼;怎样理解三段论各格的特殊规则[J];九江师专学报;1998年03期
10 高崇会;关于演绎推理的几个理论性问题[J];人文杂志;1984年06期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 陈树桢;;完善三段论的第一格，
本文编号：2482791
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2482791.html
