“第五句因”新探——从溯因推理的角度

发布时间：2019-07-10 10:31

【摘要】：对于陈那因明和法称因明的逻辑性质,国内因明学研究者有一些不同的见解,由此引申出关于"第五句因"的一些讨论。从溯因推理研究中"原因合一"的角度出发,对"第五句因"或有不同的解读。"第五句因"之所以存在,是由于在陈那因明阶段,因明论式仍存在归纳成分,而因明发展到法称阶段后,演绎成分比重增加,导致喻依的论证功能地位下降及"第五句因"的消失。依据"原因合一"的解释,首先是一个现象对应一个原因,当经过归纳推理以后得到同一个原因能够解释一系列彼此独立但互相关联的现象而非某一个特殊现象时,就达到了"原因合一",从归纳阶段发展到了演绎阶段。因此,"第五句因"在法称因明中的消失是因明论式发展的自然结果。
[Abstract]:In the light of the logical nature of Chen's Ming and the law, there are some different views of the researchers at home and abroad, and some of the discussions about the "the fifth sentence" have been extended. From the point of view of the "one-in-one" in the research of the retroactivity, there are different interpretations of the "the fifth sentence". The fifth sentence is due to the fact that in the period of Chen's Ming stage, because of the Ming and Ming dynasties, the inductive component is still present, and after the development of Ming and Ming, the proportion of the deductive component is increased, which leads to the decline of the function status and the disappearance of the fifth sentence. According to the interpretation of the "one-in-one", first is a phenomenon corresponding to a reason, when the same reason can be explained after the inductive inference can explain a series of phenomena which are independent of each other but are related to each other and not a special phenomenon, the "one-in-one" is achieved, The development of the induction phase to the deduction stage. Therefore, the disappearance of the "the fifth sentence" in the name of the law is the natural result of the development of the Ming.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标资助项目:12&ZD110
【分类号】：B812.3

【相似文献】