地球与环境科学信息网
发布时间：2016-09-26 16:31
本文关键词：西方主义与实证主义幻象:近三十年来中国人文地理学理论研究透视，，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。
参考文献：
[2]Wang Shouren.Yu Zili et al.trans.Chuanxilu.Zhengzhou:Zhongzhou Ancient Books Press,2008:408.[王守仁.于自力等校译.传习录.郑州:中州古籍出版社,2008:408.]
[3]Johnston R J.Theory and Methodology in Social Geography//Pacione N.Social Geography:Progress and Prospect.London:Croom Helm,1987:1-30.
[4]Said E W.Orientalism.London:Penguin Books Limited(UK),2003:396.[爱德华·萨义德.东方学.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店.2版.2007:528.]
[5]Liu Yungang,Wang Fenglong.Reexamining Chinese human geography:Perspective of theoretical studies in recent thirty years.Human Geography,2013,28(1):14-19.[刘云刚,王丰龙.西方主义与实证主义幻象:近三十年来中国人文地理学理论研究透视.人文地理,2013,28(1):14-19.]
[6]Stoddart D R.Geography:A European Science.In on Geography and Its History.Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1986:28-40.
[7]Morikawa H.Development of Human Geography since 1945:A Comparative Study between English and Germanspeaking Countries.Tokyo:Kokon-shoin,2004:i-iii.(in Japanese)
[8]Liu Yungang,Xu Xueqiang.Duality of Chinese geography.Scientia Geographica Sinica,2008,28(5):587-593.[刘云刚,许学强.中国地理学的二元结构.地理科学,2008,28(5):587-593.]
[9]Johnston R J.Institutions and disciplinary fortunes:Two moments in the history of UK geography in the 1960s(I):Geography in the'plateglass universities.Progress in Human Geography,2004,28(1):57-77.
[10]Johnston R J.Institutions and disciplinary fortunes:two moments in the history of UK geography in the 1960s(II):Human geography and the Social Science Research Council.Progress in Human Geography,2004,28(2):204-226.
[11]Johnston R J.Sixty years of change in human geography.The History of Postwar Social Science Seminars,London School of Economics,2006-04-25.
[12]Tokyo Geographical Society.Special issue on"Geography in the World"(Part I).Journal of Geography,2012,121(4):586-742
[13]Tokyo Geographical Society.Special issue on"Geography in the World"(Part II).Journal of Geography,2012,121(5):743-927.
[14]Kobayashi A.People,place,and region:100 years of human geography in the annals.Annals of the Association of American Geographers,2010,100(5):1095-1106.
[15]Liu Yungang.An introduction to Western geographical publication outside SCI.Human Geography,2009,24(5):31-35.[刘云刚.地理学期刊与地理学的传统:西方主要国家地理学期刊评价.人文地理,2009,24(5):31-35.]
[16]AndréMeynier.Histoire de la Pensée Geographique en France.Paris:Presses Universitaires de France,1969.[引自中译本:安德烈·梅尼埃著.蔡宗夏译.法国地理学思想史.北京:商务印书馆,1999:1-3.]
[17]Hideki Nozawa.The geographical periodical as a mirror of the development of geography.Journal of Geography,1999,103(6):663-672.
[18]Association of American Geographers.The geographical dimensions of terrorism:Action Items and Research Priorities[EB/OL].,Accessed:2014-03-21.
[19]Harm de Blij.Why Geography Matters:More Than Ever.Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005:4-5.
[20]Johnston,R.J.Geography and Geographers.4th ed.New York:Edward Arnold.1991.[中译本:唐晓峰译.地理学与地理学家.北京:商务印书馆.1999:374-408.]
[21]Liu Yungang.The politics of Chinese Geography.Geographical Research,2013,32(11):2170-2175.[刘云刚.地理学的政治.地理研究.2013,32(11):2170-2175.]
[22]Fritz Machlup.The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States.Princeton:Princeton University Press.1973.[引自中译本:弗里兹·马克卢普著,孙耀君译.美国的知识生产与分配.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007:18.]
[23]John Ziman.Real Science:What It Is and What It Means.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.2004.[引自中译本:约翰·齐曼著.曾国屏译.真科学.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2002:17-18,69-71,81-83.]
[24]Fan Mingqian.On GLNSST's mode of knowledge production.Journal of Nanjing University of Technology:Social Science Edition,2008,7(3):21-25.[樊旻倩.对GLNSST知识生产模式的探究.南京工业大学学报:社会科学版,2008,7(3):21-25.]
[25]Harvey D.The Condition of Postmodernity:An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change.Hoboken:Wiley.1989.[引自中译本:戴维·哈维著.阎嘉译.后现代的状况:对文化变迁之缘起的探究.北京:商务印书馆,2003:67,73,151,236,356,365.]
[26]Jean-Francois Lyotard.La Condition Postmoderne:Les Editions de Minuit,1979.[引自中译本:让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔尔著.车槿山译.后现代状态:关于知识的报告.南京大学出版社,2011:7-8,46,98,102-111.]
[27]Raco M,Imrie R.Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy.Environment and Planning A,2000,32(12):2187-2204.
[28]Deng Zhenglai.Retrospecting and criticizing the apparatus which knowledge is made out of.Journal of SWUPL,2004,26(3):3-6.[邓正来.知识生产机器的反思与批判:迈向中国学术规范化讨论的第二阶段.西南政法大学学报.2004,26(3):3-6.]
[29]The Economic and Social Research Council(ESRC),The Royal Geographical Society(with IBG).The Arts and Humanities Research Council(AHRC):International Benchmarking Review of UK Human Geography.:2014-04-25.
[30]Liu Weidong,Cai Yanwei,Zhou Shangyi.Review in Geography(Volume 1).Beijing:The Commercial Press,2009:181.[刘卫东,柴彦威,周尚意.地理学评论(第一辑).北京:商务印书馆,2009.181.]
[31]Marx K,Engels F.(translated from German to English by Martin M).Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.Radford:Foreign Languages Publishing House,2000.[引自中译本:马克思著.刘丕坤译.1844年经济学哲学手稿.北京:人民出版社,1979:51-57.]
[32]Chen Yingque.Jinmingguan Cong Gao Er Bian.Shanghai:SDX Joint Publishing Company,2001:279.[陈寅恪著.陈美延编.金明馆丛稿二编.上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2001:279.]
[33]Zhou Xiaohong.China studies:Possible position and reconstruction of paradigm.Sociological Studies,2010,(2):1-29.[周晓虹.中国研究的可能立场与范式重构.社会学研究,2010,(2):1-29.]
[34]Sun Guodong.The autonomy of Chinese social science.Journal of China Agricultural University:Social Sciences Edition,2013,30(2):17-26.[孙国东.中国社会科学的自主性:邓正来先生的终身关怀及其思想与实践.中国农业大学学报:社会科学版,2013,30(2):17-26.]
[35]Oriental Morning Post.Lizehou's opinion about thought and knowledge,2010.:2014-04-25.[东方早报.李泽厚再谈思想与学问.访问日期:2014-04-25.]
[36]Ai Sixiang:Moving of thought and knowledge.2010.[爱思想:思想与学术的位移.2010.访问日期:2014-04-25.]
[37]Ai Sixiang:Thought in knowledge and knowledge in thought.2010.[爱思想:思想中的学术与学术性的思想.访问日期:2014-04-25.]
1李泽厚认为1980年代之后,中国进入“思想家淡出,学问家凸显”的阶段,目前仍在这个阶段;而朱学勤也认为,八十年代是思想重于学术,九十年代则可能是学术重于思想。对此的批判则来自于邓晓芒,他认为前述论调是“自以为很有思想的学界中人走投无路时的自我欺瞒的说法”,“学理的浅薄限制了思想的深化”,“深刻的思想和学问是不分家的”等等。而中庸的观点则认为,早期的研究更有原创性与思想性,因为原本是一片空白,不规范让创造难度较低;后来的研究则没有了那么大的空白可填充,研究也日益规范化,需要在与前面的思想对话的基础上创新,创新也就越来越难了[35-37]。
2齐曼认为运转中的科学,就是研究(research))。而科学的实际运用,则是技术(technology)。
3这里的“后设性”的概念来自利奥塔尔,意思是通过后来的关于对象发展的正面结果,来赋予当初影响对象发展的因素以合法性[26]。
4部分信息来自与2014年3月10日黎斌对英国伯明翰大学地理学院Lauren Andres讲师的访谈。
5吴良镛先生在武廷海等所著《空间共享:新马克思主义与中国城镇化》(商务印书馆,2014)的序言中指出,类似城镇化这样的复杂问题,应采取“复杂问题有限求解”的方法,以现实问题为导向,化错综复杂问题为有限关键问题,寻找在相关系统的有限层次中求解的途径。据介绍,此一方法已经发展为清华大学城市规划专业工作的核心方法。
本文关键词：西方主义与实证主义幻象:近三十年来中国人文地理学理论研究透视，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。
本文编号：123867
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/renwendili/123867.html
