当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 人文地理论文 >

平原和山区县域聚落空间演变对比分析——以河南省延津县和宝丰县为例

发布时间:2019-05-17 20:56
【摘要】:以发展水平大致相当的平原县(延津县)和山区县(宝丰县)为例,基于1972、1990、2013年聚落斑块数据,运用景观格局指数、统计分析等方法对两县聚落空间演变进行对比分析表明:1两县聚落均呈集聚分布,平原县聚落逐渐趋向随机分布,而山区县集聚趋势逐渐增强。2景观指数显示两县聚落斑块面积占比变动相似,而平均斑块面积平原县明显大于山区县,且增长程度较大;平原县聚落斑块数量、密度均持续减小,而山区县持续变大;平原县最大斑块指数增加明显,而山区县有所下降;聚落邻近程度均在增强,但山区县表现更突出;1990年代前聚落扩展明显快于1990年代后,这一差异在山区县更为明显。3平原县中间位序聚落较多,聚落规模分布趋于集中,各等级规模聚落扩展差异较小;而山区县聚落规模分布趋于分散,中等规模聚落相对较少。4两县聚落扩展均快于人口增长,但1990年代后山区县两者趋于一致;经济发展不能很好地解释两县聚落扩展的差异;地形直接造成两县聚落分布模式和景观指数的不同;交通对平原县聚落的影响较山区更为显著;乡镇点对山区县聚落的影响更为复杂,其辐射带动作用均有待进一步加强。
[Abstract]:Taking Pingyuan County (Yanjin County) and Mountain County (Baofeng County) with the same level of development as examples, based on the data of settlement patches in 1972, 1990 and 2013, the landscape pattern index was used. The spatial evolution of settlements in the two counties is compared and analyzed by statistical analysis and other methods. The results show that: (1) the settlements in the two counties are concentrated and distributed, and the settlements in Pingyuan County tend to be randomly distributed. However, the agglomeration trend of mountain counties increased gradually. 2 the landscape index showed that the proportion of settlement patch area in the two counties was similar, while the average patch area in Pingyuan County was significantly larger than that in mountainous counties, and the degree of increase was greater. The number and density of settlement patches in Pingyuan County continued to decrease, while the mountain counties continued to increase, the maximum patch index in Pingyuan County increased obviously, while the mountain counties decreased, and the neighborhood degree of settlements was increased, but the mountain counties were more prominent. The expansion of settlement before 1990s is obviously faster than that after 1990s, and this difference is more obvious in mountainous counties. (3) there are more intermediate order settlements in plain counties, the distribution of settlement scale tends to be concentrated, and the difference of settlement expansion in each grade is small; However, the scale distribution of settlement in mountainous counties tends to be scattered, and the settlement in medium scale is relatively small. (4) the expansion of settlements in the two counties is faster than that in population growth, but after the 1990s, the two counties tend to be consistent, and the economic development can not explain the difference of settlement expansion between the two counties. The terrain directly causes the difference of settlement distribution pattern and landscape index between the two counties; the influence of traffic on the settlement in Pingyuan County is more significant than that in the mountain area; the influence of the township point on the settlement in the mountain county is more complex, and its radiation driving effect needs to be further strengthened.
【作者单位】: 河南大学环境与规划学院;河南财经政法大学中原经济区三化协调发展河南省协同创新中心;河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金项目(41471117) 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD770021) 河南省软科学重大项目(152400410098)
【分类号】:K901.8

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李建勇;;米脂窑洞古城民居聚落形态的价值分析[J];新西部(下半月);2007年09期

2 王刚;周学红;聂康才;;银川平原典型聚落形态研究[J];四川建筑;2011年06期

3 施瑛;潘莹;;广府民系、越海民系水乡传统聚落形态比较(下)[J];农业考古;2011年04期

4 邬建华;杨树文;;喀什聚落的形态研究之启示[J];昌吉学院学报;2013年01期

5 刘海泳,顾朝林;北京流动人口聚落的形态、结构与功能[J];地理科学;1999年06期

6 鲁西奇;;汉宋间长江中游地区的乡村聚落形态及其演变[J];历史地理;2008年00期

7 陈淳;;聚落形态与城市起源研究[J];都市文化研究;2007年01期

8 鲁西奇;韩轲轲;;散村的形成及其演变——以江汉平原腹地的乡村聚落形态及其演变为中心[J];中国历史地理论丛;2011年04期

9 鲁西奇;;散村与集村:传统中国的乡村聚落形态及其演变[J];华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2013年04期

10 李红;;聚落的起源与演变[J];长春师范学院学报(自然科学版);2010年06期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 陈勇;;四川西部山区民族聚落生态分区研究[A];首届中国民族聚居区建筑文化遗产国际研讨会论文集[C];2010年

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 记者 杜娟;上海古舆图显示独特史料价值[N];社会科学报;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 谭明;吴堡窑洞古城聚落形态的研究与保护[D];西安美术学院;2009年



本文编号:2479401

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/renwendili/2479401.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9c7dc***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com