进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的法律保障研究
本文关键词: 进城落户农民 宅基地退出 法律保障 出处:《西南政法大学》2016年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:土地是关切农民生存利益的根本性资源,其中宅基地则是根本中的根本,为农民修建遮风避雨的居所提供了条件。宅基地是具有社会保障功能和资产功能的特殊财产,对于农民来说至关重要。然而,随着我国经济的发展和城镇化进程的推进,一方面,农村劳动力向城市的流动使得农村大量宅基地闲置;另一方面,城镇化的发展又对有限的土地资源提出了新要求。因此,需要根据时下社会发展的新情况对土地资源的利用进行重新调整。结合当下的城镇化趋势,进城落户农民不断增多,而空出来的宅基地正好可以弥补城镇化用地的缺口,因此国务院在其规范性文件中确认了“宅基地有偿退出”这一双赢的模式。进城落户农民的宅基地有偿退出是一个新的土地资源流动模式,其中涉及到的诸多问题都值得探讨,本文从农民权益保障入手,对进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的相关法律保障制度进行研究。除了引言和结语,本文分为以下四个部分:第一部分,进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的理论与现实。通过先对我国宅基地制度演变历程的梳理得出现行宅基地制度改革的必要性,再将其与新型城镇化发展、户籍制度改革下进城落户农民土地财产权益实现的需要等现实问题相结合,论证解决“进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出”这一问题的现实意义。第二部分,进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的现行规定与地方探索。由于国内关于宅基地退出的现行规定主要是数量庞杂的规范性文件,故无法对其全部整理。笔者主要从宅基地退出中申请主体、退出程序、退出补偿及退出的监管和救济制度几个方面为内容来整理了部分典型性规定。比较这些规定的异同,发现其存在的问题。然后,这部分还选取了国内宅基地有偿退出试点的三个典型地方——天津、重庆、浙江。从它们关于宅基地有偿退出的实践操作中总结经验,发现缺陷,为后文建立和完善宅基地退出的法律制度保障找到依据。第三部分,进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的困境及困境的成因分析。这部分一方面是从前述现行规定及实践中总结出了宅基地退出申请主体标准不一致、退地程序趋行政化、退地补偿不合理、退地监管和救济乏力四大问题,另一方面则从宅基地退出系统保障理念不够、高位阶立法文件缺失及地区差异导致的具体困难三个方面对前面总结的问题进行了原因分析。第四部分,有序推进进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的制度保障。这部分是针对前面第二、第三部分分析的宅基地有偿退出制度规范和实践的现状、存在的问题及问题成因而设计。主要从重塑退地过程中法律保障的基本理念、探索进城落户农民有偿退出宅基地规则的法律化、考虑宅基地有偿退出制度规范应规定的内容并作出宅基地有偿退出法律保障的具体规则设计这些方面来完成对进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的法律保障。其中,具体规则设计包括了设定宅基地有偿退出的条件、丰富退地补偿内容、制定补偿标准、设定农民参与宅基地有偿退出的制度、建立和完善宅基地有偿退出的监管、救济及配套措施保障制度。
[Abstract]:Land is the basic resources for survival interests of the farmers concerned, the homestead is the root of the root, provides conditions for farmers to build residence. The homestead is a special property has the social security function and property function, is crucial for farmers. However, with the development of China's economy and urbanization the one hand, a large number of rural homestead idle make rural labor migrating to the city; on the other hand, the development of urbanization and puts forward new requirements on the limited land resources. Therefore, need to re adjust the use of land resources under the new situation of the social development. With the urbanization trend of the moment. The city settled farmers continued to increase, while the air out of the homestead can make up for the gap of urbanization, so the State Council in its normative documents in the recognition of "homestead paid Out of the win-win model. Farmers settled in the city of homestead paid exit is a new land resource flow model, which involves many problems are worth discussing, this article from the protection of farmers' rights and interests of farmers settled in the city of homestead paid exit related legal guarantee system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion in this paper, divided into the following four parts: the first part, the theory and the reality of farmers settled in the city of homestead paid exit. The first evolution of China's land system combing the necessity for reform of homestead system, and the development of new urbanization, the reform of the household registration system under the city settled farmers land property rights to realize the practical problems such as the combination of reasoning solves the practical significance of "the city settled farmers homestead paid exit this problem. The second part, farmers settled in the city The rules and the place to explore the homestead paid exit. Due to the current domestic regulations on homestead exit is the main normative documents large quantities, so not all of it. The author mainly from the homestead exit in the main application, exit, exit and exit compensation supervision and relief system aspects of content arrangement some typical provisions. Comparison of these Provisions, to find out the existing problems. Then, this part selects the homestead paid exit the pilot of the three typical place - Tianjin, Chongqing, Zhejiang. From the practice about their homestead paid exit in summing up experience, find defects, legal system the establishment and perfection of the rural homestead exit guarantee to find a basis. The third part, analysis of the causes of the difficulties and the plight of farmers settled in the city of homestead paid exit. This part of one side From the current rules and practice summed up the homestead exit for the main standard is not the same, retreat back to the administrative procedure trend, unreasonable compensation, supervision and relief back to the four big problems of weak, on the other hand from the homestead exit system security concept is not enough, the high order stand in front of the sum of the three aspects specific difficulties lead to differences in method of file missing and the local problems are analyzed. The fourth part, in order to promote the system to protect the city settled farmers homestead paid exit. This part is for the front of the second, third part analysis the status of homestead paid exit system of norms and practices, and design problems and the causes. Mainly from the basic concept of legal protection of the back remodeling process, explore the law of the city settled farmers homestead paid exit rules, considering the homestead paid exit system should be specified The specific rules of the content and make the homestead paid exit legal protection design these aspects to complete the legal guarantee of the city settled farmers homestead paid exit. Among them, the design of specific rules including setting up homestead paid exit conditions, rich back compensation content, compensation standard, set farmers in the homestead paid exit system and to establish and perfect the homestead paid exit supervision, relief and supporting measures to protect the system.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D922.32
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 季学明;;完善农民宅基地流转机制[J];党政论坛;2007年06期
2 徐汉明;;加强立法 规范农民宅基地使用权流转[J];世纪行;2012年08期
3 田晓晋;;杭州酝酿农民宅基地换城镇户口[J];共产党员;2009年09期
4 ;天津农民宅基地能换城里房[J];共产党员;2008年22期
5 熊万胜;;发达地区统筹城乡发展实践的启示[J];中国老区建设;2012年04期
6 ;南京农民宅基地确权“破冰”[J];共产党员;2008年17期
相关会议论文 前3条
1 张凤荣;;开发利用农民宅基地,城乡共建“工农一家式农村别墅”[A];2009年中国土地学会学术年会论文集[C];2009年
2 张鹏;彭开丽;张安录;;新农村建设背景下农民宅基地区位决策问题探讨——基于湖南省洪江市经济欠发达地区的微观分析[A];土地利用的城乡统筹和区域统筹——2007中国科协年会8.3分会场论文集[C];2007年
3 张鹏;彭开丽;张安录;;新农村建设背景下农民宅基地区位决策问题探讨——基于湖南省洪江市经济欠发达地区的微观分析[A];节能环保 和谐发展——2007中国科协年会论文集(二)[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 何兰生;不能打农民宅基地的歪主意[N];农民日报;2008年
2 早报评论专栏作者 童大焕;农民宅基地应可开发房产[N];东方早报;2007年
3 张代蕾;农民宅基地房可办“农家乐”[N];华东旅游报;2007年
4 本报记者 李亦恩 通讯员 张京贤;赋予农民宅基地更完整的权能[N];岳阳日报;2013年
5 本报记者 曾航;134亿的生意[N];21世纪经济报道;2009年
6 本报记者 曹昱;众农房盼早日揣上“户口本”[N];江淮时报;2008年
7 记者 杨永芹;农民宅基地复垦可向银行申请贷款[N];重庆日报;2010年
8 国家发改委产业经济与技术经济研究所 涂圣伟;赋予农民宅基地收益权处分权[N];中国经济导报;2013年
9 萱娇;市纪委市监察局对乱作为者再出重拳[N];无锡日报;2008年
10 记者 杨晓斌;夏家胡同村民20天签完腾退协议[N];北京日报;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 颜瑞;农民宅基地使用权流转的可行路径研究[D];华中师范大学;2016年
2 鲜长明;进城落户农民宅基地有偿退出的法律保障研究[D];西南政法大学;2016年
3 刘传俊;农民宅基地心理福利影响因素及保障制度构建研究[D];南京农业大学;2013年
4 刘建中;农民宅基地权利研究[D];中国政法大学;2006年
,本文编号:1480529
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shehuibaozhanglunwen/1480529.html