骗取社会保障待遇行为刑法规制研究

发布时间：2018-02-04 12:22

本文关键词： 社会保障待遇骗取行为立法设想　出处：《南昌大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：社会保障制度是社会的“减震器”、“稳定器”,但近年来骗取社会保障待遇的事件频发,既助长了社会不良之风,又严重损害了国家财产权。我国在《关于中华人民共和国刑法第二百六十六条的解释》出台之前,仅在行政法规、规章中设定了限期追回、罚款等行政处罚手段,对于情节严重构成犯罪的,追究刑事责任。尽管行政法规、规章规定了骗取社会保障待遇行为构成犯罪,但不具有刑法适用意义。司法实践中,有的仅仅是追回不予处理,有的认定为诈骗罪或者合同诈骗罪。司法实践的不统一,骗取社会保障待遇现象又愈演愈烈,引起了学界广泛的关注,大多数学者呼吁将其入罪,但在定罪上存在争议。2014年4月24日,该解释出台后将骗取社会保障待遇行为认定为诈骗罪,这在一定程度上解决了社会保障待遇欺诈的刑法适用问题。但司法实践中,对该行为的认定依旧混乱。为了充分认识当前立法对骗取社会保障待遇行为规制的局限性,本文试图从概念入手,通过分析骗取社会保障待遇行为在立法、司法上的争议,结合大陆法系、英美法系的相关规定做借鉴,提出增设骗取社会保障待遇罪,将其放入第六章妨害社会管理秩序罪中的第一节扰乱社会秩序罪中的设想,以期为刑事立法和司法实践提供参考性建议。
[Abstract]:The social security system is the "shock absorber" and "stabilizer" of the society, but in recent years, the incidents of cheating the treatment of social security occur frequently, which has helped the bad wind of the society. Before the introduction of the interpretation of Article 266th of the Criminal Law of the people's Republic of China, only in the administrative regulations, the rules set a time limit for recovery. Fines and other administrative means of punishment, for serious circumstances constitute a crime, investigated for criminal responsibility. Despite administrative regulations, rules and regulations to defraud the social security treatment constitutes a crime. However, there is no significance for the application of criminal law. In judicial practice, some cases are only recovered and not dealt with, some are identified as fraud or contract fraud. The disunity of judicial practice makes the phenomenon of obtaining social security treatment more and more serious. The majority of scholars call for its criminalization, but there is a dispute on conviction. In April 24th 2014, the interpretation of the social security treatment fraud will be considered as fraud. To a certain extent, this has solved the problem of the criminal law application of social security treatment fraud, but in judicial practice. In order to fully understand the limitations of the current legislation on the regulation of fraudulent social security treatment, this paper attempts to start with the concept, through the analysis of the fraud of social security treatment in the legislation. Judicial disputes, combined with the civil law system, Anglo-American law system of the relevant provisions for reference, proposed to add the crime of defrauding social security treatment. It is put into the first section of the crime of disturbing the social management order in Chapter 6th in order to provide reference suggestions for the criminal legislation and judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】