交通事故人身损害赔偿与工伤保险赔偿责任竞合之法律处理

发布时间：2018-02-05 17:25

本文关键词： 交通事故人身损害赔偿工伤保险赔偿竞合　出处：《湖南师范大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：人身损害赔偿是指自然人因生命权、健康权和身体权受到不法侵害,从而造成伤残、死亡以及精神痛苦等后果,受害人或其近亲属有权要求加害人以财产赔偿之方式赔偿其损害的一种法律救济制度。工伤保险赔偿是指因存在工伤事故的事实,工伤保险经办机构或用人单位就应依法予以全额赔付的救济制度,其不需要考虑遭到侵害的受害人是否存在过错。国外对交通事故人身损害赔偿与工伤保险赔偿责任竞合的处理主要有四种模式:选择模式、兼得模式、替代模式、补充模式。在法律缺位情形下,我国司法实践对二者竞合的处理主要依据最高人民法院的司法解释或参考各省高级人民法院的司法解释性文件。我国学界对二者竞合的处理主要有三种主张:补充救济模式、“原则上采取替代模式,辅之以改良的选择模式”、兼得模式。通过分析,国内外司法实务界所采用及我国学界所提出的每种模式各有利弊。应该说以“有利于受害人”的补充模式为主、兼得模式为辅的竞合处理模式是可行且更优的,该种模式既能保障受害职工的合法权益,又不至于增加社会保险负担。该种模式下处理二者竞合应秉持三点原则:公平原则、效率原则、有限处分原则。在此基础上,确立各类赔偿项目的赔偿方式,统一并完善相关的法律法规与司法解释;完善“先行支付”与“追偿”制度的实施细则。
[Abstract]:Compensation for personal injury refers to the natural person being violated illegally because of the right to life, health and body, resulting in disability, death and mental pain and other consequences. The victim or his close relatives have the right to claim the injurious person to compensate its damage by the way of property compensation a kind of legal relief system. The compensation of industrial injury insurance refers to the fact that there is an accident at work. Inductrial injury insurance agency Orgnaization or unit of choose and employ persons ought to give the relief system that pays in full according to law. It does not need to consider whether the victim of infringement has fault. There are mainly four modes to deal with the concurrence of compensation for personal injury in traffic accident and compensation liability for injury insurance in foreign countries: choice mode and concurrent mode. Alternative mode, complementary mode. In the absence of law. The judicial practice of our country mainly bases on the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court or refers to the judicial explanatory documents of the higher people's courts of various provinces. Supplementary relief model. "in principle, the alternative model is adopted, supplemented by an improved choice model", and the model is obtained. There are advantages and disadvantages of each model adopted by domestic and foreign judicial practitioners and proposed by Chinese scholars. It should be said that the complementary mode of "in favor of the victim", supplemented by the co-processing model, is feasible and better. This model can not only protect the legitimate rights and interests of the injured workers, but also not increase the burden of social insurance. In this mode, we should adhere to three principles: fair principle, efficiency principle. The principle of limited disposition. On the basis of this, we should establish the compensation mode of all kinds of compensation items, unify and perfect the relevant laws and regulations and judicial interpretation; Improve the implementation of the system of "advance payment" and "recovery".
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923;D922.5

【相似文献】