农户农村土地退出风险认知及其影响因素分析:重庆的实证

发布时间：2018-03-20 09:28

本文选题：土地管理　切入点：农户　出处：《中国土地科学》2015年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：研究目的:分析农户农村土地退出风险认知的影响因素。研究方法:基于有序Probit回归模型,结合重庆市实地调查数据,进行定量分析。研究结果:(1)从宅基地退出风险认知来看,户主年龄、家庭主要成员是否定居城镇、退地后生活质量预期、退地政策的信任程度对农户宅基地退出风险认知有显著负向影响;退地后失去稳定住所、退地后无法获得足额补偿对农户宅基地退出风险认知有显著正向影响。(2)从承包地退出风险认知来看,户主年龄、家庭有无稳定非农收入、家庭主要成员是否参加新农保、退地后生活质量预期、退地政策的信任程度对农户承包地退出风险认知有显著负向影响,而退地后无法稳定就业影响生计、退地后无法获取养老及医疗费用、退地后无法获得足额补偿对农户承包地退出风险认知有显著正向影响。(3)影响农户宅基地退出风险认知的因素少于影响农户承包地退出风险认知及规避能力的因素,说明农户对于承包地退出较宅基地退出存在更多顾虑,农户也更倾向退出宅基地。(4)同一因素也可能存在对农户宅基地、承包地退出风险认知不同的影响,这主要由宅基地与承包地所承载的保障功能差异决定的。研究结论:完善不同区域的住房保障体系,拓展农民非农就业渠道,加快城乡社保及公共服务一体化进程是降低农户土地退出风险的重要途径。
[Abstract]:Objective: to analyze the influencing factors of farmers' rural land withdrawal risk cognition. Methods: based on the ordered Probit regression model and field survey data of Chongqing, quantitative analysis is carried out. The age of the head of household, whether the main members of the family settled in the town, the expectation of the quality of life after the retreat, the degree of trust in the policy had a significant negative effect on the risk cognition of the homestead withdrawal of the farmers, and the stable residence was lost after the retreat. There is a significant positive effect on the farmers' risk cognition of withdrawing from the homestead after returning land. (2) from the perspective of the risk cognition of the withdrawal of the contracted land, the age of the head of household, the stable non-agricultural income of the household, and whether the main family members participate in the new rural insurance. The expectation of quality of life after returning land, the degree of trust in the policy of returning land has a significant negative influence on the risk cognition of farmer's withdrawal from contracted land, but after returning land, the employment can not be stable and the livelihood can not be affected, and the pension and medical expenses can not be obtained after the retreat. The factors that affect the farmers' risk cognition of withdrawing from the homestead are less than the factors that affect the farmers' risk cognition and evading ability. It shows that there are more concerns about the withdrawal of contracted land than that of the homestead, and farmers tend to withdraw from the homestead. (4) the same factor may have different effects on the farmers' homestead, and the risk cognition of the withdrawal of the contracted land is different. This is mainly determined by the difference of the security function between the homestead and the contracted land. Conclusion: improve the housing security system in different regions and expand the channels of non-agricultural employment for farmers. Speeding up the process of social security and public service integration is an important way to reduce the risk of farmers' land withdrawal.
【作者单位】：重庆工商大学旅游与国土资源学院;西南大学地理科学学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“基于微观退地主体的宅基地退出增值收益分享研究”(14CJY043) 重庆市社科规划项目(2013PYGL15) 教育部人文社科项目(14YJCZH069) 重庆工商大学校内基金项目(1351005)
【分类号】：F321.1

【参考文献】