我国刑事交叉询问制度改革重构

发布时间：2018-04-08 19:11

本文选题：刑事诉讼　切入点：交叉询问　出处：《哈尔滨工业大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国2012年新修改的《刑事诉讼法》中初步引入控辩双方交叉询问的举证质证模式,由控辩双方通过举证质证等一系列程序,推动庭审进行的证据调查方式,但在立法与司法实践中此种证人询问模式并未真正的发挥作用。对比研究英国、美国、德国日本及台湾地区的几种证人询问模式,反映出我国交叉询问制度在理念与文化层面中存在的问题。按照国际刑事法院程序正义的标准,交叉询问是法治社会保障人权与价值的具体制度,同时也符合我国“以事实为依据,以法律为准绳”的基本诉讼原则。刑事诉讼的目的在于惩戒犯罪实现国家刑罚权,而实现刑罚权要以事实为依据以真实为基础。如今世界上的大多数国家都在积极探索还原案件真实的方法,论文将在两大法系的互相交融与我国司法改革的大背景之下,对于我国刑事诉讼交叉询问制度的重构展开初步探讨,进而探索交叉询问的理论价值、实质价值、人权保障价值,从而达到发现案件真实、维护程序正义、实现实体正义的目的。对比我国传统诉讼的历史演变进程,分析当今证人询问制度的原因,提出交叉询问的程序规则和相应配套性措施,包括陪审制度、辩护制度、法官制度、证人出庭作证制度以及审前准备程序等制度,以期真正发挥交叉询问制度发现案件真实之功效。
[Abstract]:In our country's newly amended Criminal procedure Law in 2012, the mode of cross-examination of evidence between the prosecution and the defence was initially introduced, and a series of procedures, such as cross-examination of evidence, were adopted by the prosecution and the defence to promote the way of evidence investigation carried out in court.However, in the legislative and judicial practice, this mode of witness interrogation has not really played a role.A comparative study of several witness interrogation modes in Britain, the United States, Germany, Japan and Taiwan reflects the problems in the concept and culture of the cross-examination system in China.According to the standard of procedural justice of the International Criminal Court, cross-inquiry is the concrete system of social security of human rights and value under the rule of law. At the same time, it is also in line with the basic procedural principle of "taking facts as the basis and the law as the yardstick" in our country.The purpose of the criminal procedure is to punish the crime to realize the state penalty right, and the realization of the penalty right should be based on the fact and the truth.Nowadays, most of the countries in the world are actively exploring ways to restore the truth of the case. The thesis will be in the background of the blending of the two legal systems and the judicial reform of our country.In order to find out the truth of the case and maintain the procedural justice, this paper discusses the reconstruction of the cross-examination system in criminal proceedings in China, and then explores the theoretical value, the substantive value and the human rights guarantee value of the cross-questioning system.To achieve the objective of substantive justice.This paper compares the historical evolution of traditional litigation in China, analyzes the reasons of the witness questioning system, and puts forward the procedural rules of cross-examination and corresponding supporting measures, including jury system, defense system, judge system, etc.The system of witness testifying in court and pretrial preparation procedure is expected to play the role of cross-examination system in discovering the truth of the case.
【学位授予单位】：哈尔滨工业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】