农地流转过程中土地社会保障功能货币化机制研究

发布时间：2019-01-27 09:33

【摘要】：长期以来,土地以提供实物型的生产资料和生活资料的方式充当着农村地区的社会保障功能,同时也是农户心里最后的就业和养老保障,土地的社会保障功能在替代落后的农村社会保障建设方面发挥着重要作用。近年来,随着我国农村经济发展和农民生活水平的提高,农民生产和生活观念的改变,实物型的土地社会保障功能逐渐弱化,甚至出现“虚化”现象。因此,通过对土地产权制度的改革,探索土地社会保障功能货币化实现的新形式,探求土地社会保障功能发挥作用的新途径,具有一定的理论和实践意义。本文主要是基于农地产权比例化流转理论设想以及相应的双重保障型农地流转公积金制度建设,进而提出土地社会保障功能货币化机制。文章首先分析土地社会保障功能在农村保障作用的现状和面临的困境;其次,进一步介绍“土地换保障”模式在成都推行的实践案例,通过分析该模式在实际推行中存在的问题与不足,总结在探索土地社会保障功能实现形式可能的借鉴经验之处;最后,阐述土地社会保障功能货币化机制的方案设计,然后采用多元有序Logistic回归模型分析农户参与缴纳土地社会保障功能货币化机制意愿的影响因素,同时对农户参与公积金缴纳意愿比例水平进行补充性分析,主要研究结论如下:(1)土地社会保障功能改革与变迁是随着农村土地产权制度的变革同步进行的,合适的农地产权制度有利于土地社会保障功能发挥最大效应。土地社会保障功能货币化机制既是对农村土地产权制度的探索创新,也是对土地保障功能实现形式的创新,它符合农户对土地保障功能的利益需求,同时也有助于农村社会保障体系的建设。(2)从农户特征和家庭经济特征来看,农户年龄在20-50岁、文化程度越高以及家庭收入水平越高,他们参与缴纳双重保障型农地流转公积金的意愿越强;从农户对社会保障认知特征和农地流转认知特征来看,农户社会保障认知意识越强、农户的土地转出的意愿越强以及农户对农地产权比例化流转制度设想评价满意度越高,愿意缴纳双重保障型农地流转公积金的可能性就越高。(3)农户参与缴纳双重保障型农地流转公积金的意愿比例较低,主要原因是农户担心农地产权比例化流转制度设想和土地社会保障货币化机制能否长期推行以及缴纳公积金后土地流转收入无法保障失地后的生产生活等因素。因此,需要探索双重保障型农地流转公积金三方缴存机制,同时给予农户适当的财政补贴以及健全失地农户社会保障体系,以建立农户缴纳双重保障型农地流转公积金的激励和保障机制。
[Abstract]:For a long time, land has served as a social security function in rural areas by providing physical means of production and means of livelihood, as well as the last employment and old-age security in the hearts of farmers. The social security function of land plays an important role in replacing the backward rural social security construction. In recent years, with the development of rural economy and the improvement of farmers' living standard, the concept of farmers' production and life has changed, and the function of physical land social security has gradually weakened, even appeared the phenomenon of "vanity". Therefore, through the reform of land property right system, it is of theoretical and practical significance to explore a new form of realizing the monetization of land social security function and to explore a new way for land social security function to play its role. This paper is mainly based on the theoretical assumption of the proportional transfer of farmland property rights and the corresponding construction of the dual guarantee farmland transfer accumulation fund system, and then puts forward the monetization mechanism of land social security function. Firstly, the paper analyzes the current situation of the function of land social security in rural areas and the difficulties it faces. Secondly, the paper further introduces the practice case of "land for security" model in Chengdu, through analyzing the problems and shortcomings in the actual implementation of the model, summarizes the possible experience in exploring the realization form of land social security function; Finally, the paper expounds the scheme design of the monetization mechanism of land social security function, and then analyzes the influencing factors of farmers' willingness to participate in the monetization mechanism of land social security function by using the multivariate ordered Logistic regression model. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the reform and changes of land social security function are carried out with the reform of rural land property right system. The suitable farmland property right system is advantageous to the land social security function to play the biggest effect. The monetization mechanism of land social security function is not only the exploration and innovation of rural land property right system, but also the innovation of land security function realization form. It also contributes to the construction of rural social security system. (2) from the characteristics of farmers and family economic characteristics, the age of farmers is 20-50 years old, the higher the education level and the higher the level of family income, The more willing they are to participate in the payment of double security farmland transfer accumulation fund; From the perspective of farmers' cognitive characteristics of social security and rural land transfer, the stronger the cognitive consciousness of farmers' social security is, the stronger the farmers' willingness to transfer land is and the higher the satisfaction degree of farmers' evaluation of the assumption of rural land property rights proportional transfer system. The more likely it is to be willing to pay the double security farmland transfer accumulation fund. (3) the proportion of farmers' willingness to participate in the dual security farmland transfer accumulation fund is lower. The main reasons are that farmers are worried about the assumption of rural land property rights proportional circulation system, whether the monetization mechanism of land social security can be carried out for a long time and the fact that land circulation income cannot guarantee the production and life after losing land after paying the accumulation fund. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the three-party payment and deposit mechanism of the dual-security farmland transfer accumulation fund, at the same time to give the farmers appropriate financial subsidies and improve the social security system of land-lost farmers. In order to establish a dual-guarantee farmers payment of farmland transfer provident fund incentive and security mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：西北农林科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F321.1

【相似文献】