当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 社会学论文 >

《诗》学的天人一贯与古今之变

发布时间:2018-02-14 10:28

  本文关键词: 《诗经》 诗教 天人关系 古今之变 性情 出处:《同济大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年01期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:《诗经》仅仅是一部言情咏怀的歌谣集子,还是富有伦理道德含义与政治教化含义的经典?《韩诗外传》"陈情欲以歌道义"的思想提示我们,歌咏儿女情长的方面和讽喻道德教化的方面可能并不是矛盾的,而是相辅相成的。作为六经之一,《诗经》是天人一贯的。只看到其中任何一面都是不足以理解《诗》之为经的。现代《诗》学片面强调《诗经》属人的一面,刻意剔除属天的一面,反对诗教的伦理政教含义,不过是出于现代性的偏见。所以,现代《诗》学对古代疑经《诗》学的征引是完全误置的。文章最后通过解读《关雎》中的"逑"字大义,说明了《诗经》和古代《诗》学传统是通天人、贯古今的文质彬彬形态。
[Abstract]:The Book of songs is just a collection of ballads, or is it a classic with moral and political implications? The thought of "Chen Lust and Song morality" reminds us that the aspects of singing about children and daughters and alleging moral enlightenment may not be contradictory. It is complementary. As one of the six Classics, the Book of songs is consistent between Heaven and Man. It is not enough to understand the Book of songs as a sutras only to see any of them. Deliberately dismissing the heavenly side and opposing the ethical, political and religious meaning of poetry is only due to the prejudice of modernity. The modern "poem" study is completely misplaced to the ancient sutras "poem" study. Finally, by interpreting the meaning of the word "Qiu" in Guan Ju, the paper explains that the Book of songs and the ancient tradition of "poetry" are all heavenly people. Throughout the ancient and modern style of politeness.
【作者单位】: 同济大学人文学院;
【分类号】:C09;I207.22

【共引文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 闵顺琴,卢和乐;《诗集传》词语训释商榷[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2003年04期

2 卜师霞;;《诗经·载驰》诗意考辨[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2007年03期

3 王硕民;《韩诗外传》新论[J];安徽大学学报;2003年02期

4 何琳仪;,

本文编号:1510496


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1510496.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户66623***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com