我国人文社会科学学科多样性研究

发布时间：2018-03-24 16:34

本文选题：人文社会科学　切入点：学科交叉　出处：《情报科学》2015年04期

【摘要】：基于1998-2011年CSSCI期刊引文数据,从学科多样性的角度对中国人文社会科学跨学科属性进行分析。以学科多样性代表学科交叉程度,整合跨学科引用和被引两个方向上强度、广度、均匀性三个维度属性,使用布里渊指数作为多样性测度指标。本文提供一个考察中文社科整体学科属性的研究视角,结果表明:布里渊指数能够较好反映学科引用和被引多样性,引用多样性方面,民族学最高,语言学最低;被引多样性方面,政治学最高,体育学最低。对综合多样性的分析可将中文社科23个学科划分为6个多样性水平,图书馆、情报与文献学处于低水平,对引用率和被引率的统计印证多样性分析结果是可靠准确的。最后针对图书馆、情报与文献学多样性水平较低的现状,给出了相应建议和展望。
[Abstract]:Based on the citation data of CSSCI journals from 1998 to 2011, this paper analyzes the interdisciplinary attributes of Chinese humanities and social sciences from the point of view of discipline diversity. Using Brillouin index as a measure index of diversity, this paper provides a perspective to study the attributes of Chinese social sciences as a whole. The results show that Brillouin index can better reflect the diversity of citations and citations of subjects. In terms of citation diversity, ethnology is the highest, linguistics is the lowest, and political science is the highest in cited diversity. The analysis of comprehensive diversity can divide 23 subjects of Chinese social sciences into 6 levels of diversity, while libraries, information and philology are at a low level. The statistical results of citation rate and cited rate are reliable and accurate. Finally, in view of the low level of diversity of information and bibliography in libraries, the corresponding suggestions and prospects are given.
【作者单位】：武汉大学信息资源研究中心;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目(71173249)
【分类号】：C12;G353.1

【参考文献】