社会认同,匿名性和责任分散对网络群体极化的影响
发布时间:2018-05-27 14:24
本文选题:去个性化的社会认同模型 + 社会认同 ; 参考:《湖南师范大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着科技的飞速发展,人们的生活范围已经不再局限于现实世界当中,网络现在已俨然成为人们社会生活的重要场所。虽然网络是虚拟的世界,但是,网络中也有着和现实世界相同的群体心理现象,群体极化就是其中的一种。而且,由于群体极化,网民对于一些热点事件的极端观点也造成了很多不良的影响。因此,网络群体极化这种心理现象是值得我们重视和研究的。 关于群体极化,现有的理论解释主要有:社会比较理论、争论与说服理论和去个性化的社会认同模型,但是,能凸显网络的匿名性,并且相关研究已延伸到网络范畴的,就只有去个性化的社会认同模型。而且,尚无研究在中国文化背景下验证去个性化的社会认同模型,因此,实验一将以Lea和Spear的范式为基础,考察社会认同和匿名性对中国被试网络群体极化的影响。 另外,由于在实际操作中,网络实名制还存在一定困难和争议,同时,责任分散即是去个性化操作的一种,也是影响群体极化的因素之一,因此,实验二在去个性化的社会认同模型基础上,考察了社会认同和责任分散对网络群体极化的影响。 本研究的结论是: (1)、社会认同和匿名性之间有着交互作用,共同影响网络群体极化,并且,匿名对网络群体极化的作用受到社会认同的影响。 (2)、一般情况下,网络实名制的确可以起到抑制网络群体极化的作用,但是,在群体认同显著的情况下,匿名与否对网络群体极化没有影响。 (3)、社会认同和责任分散之间有这交互作用,共同影响网络群体极化,并且,责任分散对网络群体极化的作用受到社会认同的影响。 (4)、在现实生活中,通过操纵责任分散可以启到抑制网络群体极化的作用。因为,在群体认同显著的条件下,责任分散个体的极化要大于非责任分散的个体。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology, the scope of people's life is no longer confined to the real world, the network has become an important place for people's social life. Although the network is a virtual world, there are the same group psychological phenomena in the network as in the real world, and group polarization is one of them. Moreover, due to group polarization, the extreme views of netizens on some hot issues have also caused a lot of adverse effects. Therefore, the psychological phenomenon of network group polarization is worthy of our attention and research. On group polarization, the existing theoretical explanations include: social comparison theory, argument and persuasion theory and depersonalization model of social identity. However, it can highlight the anonymity of the network, and the related research has been extended to the category of the network. There is only a depersonalization model of social identity. Moreover, there is no research to verify the depersonalization model of social identity in Chinese cultural background. Therefore, experiment 1 will examine the influence of social identity and anonymity on the population polarization of Chinese subjects' network based on the paradigm of Lea and Spear. In addition, in practice, there are still some difficulties and controversies in the network real-name system. At the same time, the decentralization of responsibility is not only a kind of de-individualized operation, but also one of the factors that affect the group polarization. On the basis of depersonalization social identity model, experiment 2 investigates the influence of social identity and responsibility dispersion on network population polarization. The conclusions of this study are as follows: There is interaction between social identity and anonymity, which influences the polarization of network group together, and the effect of anonymity on the polarization of network group is influenced by social identity. Generally speaking, the real name system can inhibit the polarization of the network group, but in the case of significant group identity, anonymity has no effect on the polarization of the network group. The interaction between social identity and responsibility dispersion affects the polarization of network group together, and the role of responsibility decentralization on network group polarization is affected by social identity. In real life, the decentralization of manipulation responsibility can inhibit the polarization of network groups. Because, under the condition of significant group identity, the polarization of the responsible decentralized individual is greater than that of the non-responsible decentralized individual.
【学位授予单位】:湖南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:C912
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 吴兰花;跨文化心理学中个人主义和集体主义研究概述[J];湖南第一师范学报;2003年01期
2 韦义平;试述社会作用力理论及其教育应用[J];广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1994年03期
3 李春;宫秀丽;;自我分类理论概述[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年03期
4 李红霞;张海钟;;个体主义和集体主义的跨文化心理学研究述评[J];社会工作下半月(理论);2009年06期
5 谢天;郑全全;陈华娇;;以计算机为媒介的沟通对人际交流关系的影响[J];心理科学;2009年01期
6 张莹瑞;佐斌;;社会认同理论及其发展[J];心理科学进展;2006年03期
7 兰玉娟;佐斌;;去个性化效应的社会认同模型[J];心理科学进展;2009年02期
,本文编号:1942463
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/1942463.html