重写中国近代学术史:体例与方法
发布时间：2018-08-08 12:25
【摘要】：重写中国近代学术史是一项系统工程,涉及到体例、方法、思路等诸多问题。重写近代学术史首先在于体例之确定,借鉴中西史书体裁的优点,采用综合创新体裁撰写学术史,应当成为重写学术史题中应有之义。而在方法论方面,应当淡化所谓的范式之争和意识形态考量,建立相对客观的学术史叙事模式。近代学术史研究应当从学术自身出发,摒弃预设的"范式"和观念,用恰切的体例编纂出具有时代特色的近代学术史,这是建立相对客观的学术史叙事模式在方法论方面自觉的表现。
[Abstract]:Rewriting the academic history of modern China is a systematic project involving many problems, such as style, methods, ideas and so on. The rewriting of modern academic history lies first in the determination of style, drawing lessons from the advantages of Chinese and Western historical genre, and adopting comprehensive and innovative genres to write academic history, which should become the proper meaning in rewriting academic history. In the aspect of methodology, we should desalinate the controversy of paradigm and ideological considerations, and establish a relatively objective narrative model of academic history. The study of modern academic history should proceed from the academic itself, abandon the presupposition "paradigm" and ideas, and compile the modern academic history with the characteristics of the times with appropriate style. This is to establish a relatively objective narrative model of academic history in the methodology of conscious performance.
【作者单位】： 韩山师范学院历史系;
【基金】：2010年度教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目《中国近代历史编纂的演变路径、主要成就与当代价值》(10YJA770043)
【分类号】：C092
本文编号：2171781
[Abstract]:Rewriting the academic history of modern China is a systematic project involving many problems, such as style, methods, ideas and so on. The rewriting of modern academic history lies first in the determination of style, drawing lessons from the advantages of Chinese and Western historical genre, and adopting comprehensive and innovative genres to write academic history, which should become the proper meaning in rewriting academic history. In the aspect of methodology, we should desalinate the controversy of paradigm and ideological considerations, and establish a relatively objective narrative model of academic history. The study of modern academic history should proceed from the academic itself, abandon the presupposition "paradigm" and ideas, and compile the modern academic history with the characteristics of the times with appropriate style. This is to establish a relatively objective narrative model of academic history in the methodology of conscious performance.
【作者单位】： 韩山师范学院历史系;
【基金】：2010年度教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目《中国近代历史编纂的演变路径、主要成就与当代价值》(10YJA770043)
【分类号】：C092
【相似文献】
相关会议论文 前1条
1 ;说明[A];三生共赢论坛·2009北京会议会议材料[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 武道房 安徽师范大学文学院;诠释中国思想史本质[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
，本文编号：2171781
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2171781.html
教材专著
