机械设备的国际比较及方法研究
发布时间:2018-09-06 07:17
【摘要】:国际比较项目(ICP)是进行国际经济比较的活动,由联合国统计委员会、世界银行等国际组织牵头组织实施的。2011年一轮ICP活动是目前为止参与国家最多的一次,大约200个国家参与其中,而中国也全面参与了这一轮的国际经济比较中。中国的积极参加不仅是国际比较项目走向成熟的需要,也有助于中国经济长足稳定发展。然而,国内对于国际比较项目的认识与研究还比较薄弱,这也严重影响了中国参与国际比较项目活动的能力。 机械设备的比较在国际比较项目中是一大难题,还存在很多问题需要去解决。本文以此为研究对象,希望通过对该领域国际前沿研究的仔细分析,探讨机械设备国际比较的重点与难点,也希望通过本文的讨论,对中国参与该项目国际比较有一定的启示。本文的基本结构如下: 第一章,绪论。主要阐述了本文的研究背景、研究内容、选题意义和本文的结构安排。 第二章,机械设备国际比较的基本范畴。主要讨论了机械设备国际比较的四个基本流程,阐述了四个基本流程的工作内容和所涉及的工作人员,并且评价了各个流程在整个过程中的地位和作用,对机械设备的国际比较有一个整体的了解。 第三章,2005年一轮机械设备国际比较方法及评价。主要讨论了以2005年为基期的一轮机械设备国际比较,研究这一轮比较中涉及的各种方法,并且对各个流程中涉及的方法所存在的问题也进行了相应的研究,总结出存在的具体问题,比如对二手设备的忽视、提交的数据类型各异、问卷缺乏对来源地等的考虑等问题。 第四章,2011年新一轮机械设备国际比较的新提议及评价。在总结2005年一轮的机械设备国际比较的基础上,对以2011年为基期的新一轮的机械设备国际比较提出了一定的建议。另外,在总结经验的基础上,也对新一轮的机械设备国际比较中的创新进行了研究,比如采用价格因素法(Price Factor Method)计算购买力平价等。 第五章,机械设备国际比较的重点、难点分析。在上文讨论的基础上,对机械设备国际比较中的重点、难点问题又进行了更加深入的探讨与总结,比如产品清单的制定、设备产品价格数据的质量保证、产品的代表性与可比性的平衡、进行多边比较和PPP汇总所采用的方法等,总结出更加适宜的方法。 第六章,结论与展望。结论部分是对前述分析的总结,主要得出几个结论,比如要选择跨国大品牌、采用产品结构描述表等。通过对机械设备国际比较的综合研究,展望部分提出了未来中国研究机械设备国际比较可以着手的几个方面。 本文的主要贡献在于:一是全面梳理了机械设备国际比较的基本流程,并且通过该项目比较的流程,简单地了解到整个国际比较项目的基本操作流程;二是对各个流程中涉及的方法进行了详细的讨论,并且总结所存在的问题,给出了相应的建议和措施,同时对相关问题进行了一定创新;三是增加了我国当前对机械设备国际比较的研究,当前中国学者只是对ICP的总体进行研究,而没有就某一个项目进行深入的研究,因此,希望通过本文的研究能够对中国参与以后的机械设备国际比较有所帮助。 当然本文还有很大的不足,由于国际比较数据获得比较困难,所以本文缺乏具体数据的支持,会比较空泛,而且在一些方法、问题的论证或是用词上还不是很到位,这些都需要后期的不断改进,我也会不断进行研究和改进。
[Abstract]:The International Comparison Program (ICP) is an international economic comparison activity led by the United Nations Statistical Commission, the World Bank and other international organizations. China's active participation is not only necessary for the maturity of international comparative projects, but also conducive to the steady development of China's economy.
The comparison of machinery and equipment is a difficult problem in the international comparison project, and there are still many problems to be solved. This paper takes this as the research object, and hopes to discuss the key and difficult points of the international comparison of machinery and equipment through the careful analysis of the international frontier research in this field. It also hopes that through the discussion of this paper, China will participate in the international comparison of the project. The basic structure of this paper is as follows:
The first chapter, introduction, mainly elaborates the research background, research content, topic significance and the structure of this paper.
Chapter two, the basic category of international comparison of machinery and equipment, mainly discusses the four basic processes of international comparison of machinery and equipment, expounds the working contents and staff involved in the four basic processes, evaluates the status and role of each process in the whole process, and has a comprehensive understanding of the international comparison of machinery and equipment.
Chapter three, the method and evaluation of the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005. It mainly discusses the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005 as the base period, studies the various methods involved in this round of comparison, and studies the problems of the methods involved in each process, sums up the specific problems, such as The neglect of second-hand equipment, the different types of data submitted, and the lack of consideration of the origin and so on.
Chapter Four: New proposals and evaluation of the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. On the basis of summarizing the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005, some suggestions are put forward for the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. In addition, on the basis of summarizing experience, a new round of International comparison of machinery and equipment is also made. The innovations in this paper, such as the Price Factor Method, are studied.
Chapter Five, the key and difficult points of international comparison of mechanical equipment. On the basis of the above discussion, the key and difficult problems in international comparison of mechanical equipment are further discussed and summarized, such as the formulation of product list, the quality assurance of price data of equipment products, the balance of product representativeness and comparability, and so on. A more appropriate method is summed up by edge comparison and the method of PPP summarization.
Chapter 6, conclusions and prospects. The conclusion part is a summary of the above analysis, mainly draws several conclusions, such as the choice of transnational brands, the use of product structure description tables and so on.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows: firstly, the basic process of international comparison of machinery and equipment is sorted out comprehensively, and the basic operation process of the whole international comparison project is simply understood through the process of the project comparison; secondly, the methods involved in each process are discussed in detail, and the existing problems are summarized and given. Corresponding suggestions and measures, at the same time, some innovations have been made on the related issues; Third, China has increased the current research on the international comparison of machinery and equipment. At present, Chinese scholars only study the overall ICP, but not on a certain project in-depth study, so I hope that through this study China can participate in the future. International Comparison of mechanical equipment is helpful.
Of course, there are still great shortcomings in this paper, because international comparative data is difficult to obtain, so this paper lacks specific data support, will be relatively empty, and in some methods, the problem of argument or wording is not in place, these need to be improved later, I will continue to study and improve.
【学位授予单位】:东北财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:C829.2
本文编号:2225645
[Abstract]:The International Comparison Program (ICP) is an international economic comparison activity led by the United Nations Statistical Commission, the World Bank and other international organizations. China's active participation is not only necessary for the maturity of international comparative projects, but also conducive to the steady development of China's economy.
The comparison of machinery and equipment is a difficult problem in the international comparison project, and there are still many problems to be solved. This paper takes this as the research object, and hopes to discuss the key and difficult points of the international comparison of machinery and equipment through the careful analysis of the international frontier research in this field. It also hopes that through the discussion of this paper, China will participate in the international comparison of the project. The basic structure of this paper is as follows:
The first chapter, introduction, mainly elaborates the research background, research content, topic significance and the structure of this paper.
Chapter two, the basic category of international comparison of machinery and equipment, mainly discusses the four basic processes of international comparison of machinery and equipment, expounds the working contents and staff involved in the four basic processes, evaluates the status and role of each process in the whole process, and has a comprehensive understanding of the international comparison of machinery and equipment.
Chapter three, the method and evaluation of the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005. It mainly discusses the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005 as the base period, studies the various methods involved in this round of comparison, and studies the problems of the methods involved in each process, sums up the specific problems, such as The neglect of second-hand equipment, the different types of data submitted, and the lack of consideration of the origin and so on.
Chapter Four: New proposals and evaluation of the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. On the basis of summarizing the international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2005, some suggestions are put forward for the new round of international comparison of machinery and equipment in 2011. In addition, on the basis of summarizing experience, a new round of International comparison of machinery and equipment is also made. The innovations in this paper, such as the Price Factor Method, are studied.
Chapter Five, the key and difficult points of international comparison of mechanical equipment. On the basis of the above discussion, the key and difficult problems in international comparison of mechanical equipment are further discussed and summarized, such as the formulation of product list, the quality assurance of price data of equipment products, the balance of product representativeness and comparability, and so on. A more appropriate method is summed up by edge comparison and the method of PPP summarization.
Chapter 6, conclusions and prospects. The conclusion part is a summary of the above analysis, mainly draws several conclusions, such as the choice of transnational brands, the use of product structure description tables and so on.
The main contributions of this paper are as follows: firstly, the basic process of international comparison of machinery and equipment is sorted out comprehensively, and the basic operation process of the whole international comparison project is simply understood through the process of the project comparison; secondly, the methods involved in each process are discussed in detail, and the existing problems are summarized and given. Corresponding suggestions and measures, at the same time, some innovations have been made on the related issues; Third, China has increased the current research on the international comparison of machinery and equipment. At present, Chinese scholars only study the overall ICP, but not on a certain project in-depth study, so I hope that through this study China can participate in the future. International Comparison of mechanical equipment is helpful.
Of course, there are still great shortcomings in this paper, because international comparative data is difficult to obtain, so this paper lacks specific data support, will be relatively empty, and in some methods, the problem of argument or wording is not in place, these need to be improved later, I will continue to study and improve.
【学位授予单位】:东北财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:C829.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王玲;基于购买力平价(PPP)的中外经济实力比较[J];世界经济;2002年07期
2 江健桐;国际比较项目的发展和初步评价[J];统计研究;1993年01期
3 余芳东;购买力平价和汇率方法的差异程度及其原因分析[J];统计研究;2003年08期
4 丛培华;;国际经济比较中量值统一的价值尺度——剖析联合国ICP方法的缺陷[J];统计研究;2007年05期
5 余芳东;;关于世界银行2005年ICP结果、问题及应用的研究[J];统计研究;2008年06期
6 袁卫;邱东;任若恩;李善同;许召元;何新华;;专家诠释ICP[J];统计研究;2008年06期
7 余芳东;;2011年新一轮国际比较项目(ICP)方法改进[J];统计研究;2011年01期
8 余芳东;当前全球国际比较项目的现状、问题及建议[J];统计与预测;2000年03期
9 余芳东;;我国参加国际比较项目(ICP)的演变历程[J];统计研究;2012年08期
10 巩斌;对我国参与国际比较项目的思考[J];统计与咨询;2003年05期
,本文编号:2225645
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2225645.html
教材专著