现代社会中的权力与支配:基于分配视角的考察
发布时间：2018-09-18 14:05
【摘要】：从分配视角出发,权力是稀缺的产物。稀缺使分配成为了必要,权力则产生于分配的行为与过程之中。分配可以采取设置一个分配者,由它决定所有社会剩余之归属的方式,也可以采取设置某种竞争规则,由社会成员通过竞争来获取社会剩余的方式。在这两种分配方式中,实践性权力与制度性权力有着不同的功能与特征。实践性权力的行使并不必然造成支配,只有当不存在退出选项时,实践性权力关系才变成了支配关系。现代社会保障个体层面的退出自由,在很大程度上祛除了实践性权力的支配性。结果,支配更多成为了制度性权力行使的结果。当集体决策中出现了永久少数,或授权决策中的授权决策者失去了中立性时,制度性权力就变成了一种支配性力量。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of distribution, power is the product of scarcity. Scarcity makes distribution necessary, while power comes from the behavior and process of distribution. Allocation can be done by setting a distributor, who decides the ownership of all the social residues, or by setting some kind of competition rules, in which the members of the society can obtain the social surplus through competition. In these two ways of distribution, practical power and institutional power have different functions and characteristics. The exercise of practical power does not necessarily lead to domination, only when there is no exit option, the practical power relationship becomes dominance. The freedom to withdraw from the individual level of modern social security, to a great extent, dispel the dominance of practical power. As a result, domination has become the result of the exercise of institutional power. When there is a permanent minority in collective decision-making, or the authorized decision maker loses its neutrality, institutional power becomes a dominant force.
【作者单位】： 南京大学政府管理学院;南京大学人文社会科学高级研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“治理能力现代化视阈下政府职能履行方式研究”(项目号:14 CZZ003)的阶段性成果 江苏服务型政府建设研究基地资助(NO.30916014110 & NO.30916013123)
【分类号】：D033;C912.3
本文编号：2248147
[Abstract]:From the perspective of distribution, power is the product of scarcity. Scarcity makes distribution necessary, while power comes from the behavior and process of distribution. Allocation can be done by setting a distributor, who decides the ownership of all the social residues, or by setting some kind of competition rules, in which the members of the society can obtain the social surplus through competition. In these two ways of distribution, practical power and institutional power have different functions and characteristics. The exercise of practical power does not necessarily lead to domination, only when there is no exit option, the practical power relationship becomes dominance. The freedom to withdraw from the individual level of modern social security, to a great extent, dispel the dominance of practical power. As a result, domination has become the result of the exercise of institutional power. When there is a permanent minority in collective decision-making, or the authorized decision maker loses its neutrality, institutional power becomes a dominant force.
【作者单位】： 南京大学政府管理学院;南京大学人文社会科学高级研究院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“治理能力现代化视阈下政府职能履行方式研究”(项目号:14 CZZ003)的阶段性成果 江苏服务型政府建设研究基地资助(NO.30916014110 & NO.30916013123)
【分类号】：D033;C912.3
【相似文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 张力毅;论通过契约实现的物之支配关系[D];南京大学;2013年
，本文编号：2248147
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2248147.html
教材专著
