当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 社会学论文 >

中国社会学乡村研究与再研究的比较分析

发布时间:2018-11-07 08:15
【摘要】:再研究作为一种社会学的研究取向,近年来越来越受到学术界的关注。目前的社会学再研究大多是在某一特定的乡村社会中开展实地调查研究,尤其是一些学术名村,学者们在前人研究的基础上进行更进一步的探究,以实现学术对话。 本文以中国社会学乡村研究与再研究的比较分析为主体,分析的四组案例都是具有学术传承性的著作,分别为《金翼》与《银翅》、《禄村农田》与《土地象征》、《祖荫之下》与《地域的等级》、《芒市边民的摆》与《人神之间》,对比四组再研究的方法、内容、过程与结论,通过对比研究可以发现,再研究需要在现有的研究基础上进行具有继承和反思性的研究,这种研究必须具备创新性,不仅仅是对研究地点的社会变迁事实有新的发现,还应更多的关注前者在研究中未能注意到或没有解释的现象及问题,以这些主题作为再研究的切入点,才能够有助于学术的承前启后。在此基础上阐述了再研究模式的必要性及意义,从方法论层面讲,它更多的具有人文主义倾向,强调分析研究中的历史性视角,注重文化因素的影响;在研究方法的层面,列举了其在实践研究中的几个具体取向,包括研究对象的选择均为已开辟的研究点、在研究维度上将历时研究与共时研究相结合、重视本土实践与研究对话等。最后,通过以上论述,笔者提出,社会学的四种研究范式在指导研究的过程中均缺少历史变迁的视角,而再研究则注重社会的变迁对某一社区或社会现象的影响,从而提出新的解释。因此,笔者认为再研究模式可能具有社会学研究的范式意义,值得进行更为深刻地讨论。
[Abstract]:As a sociological research orientation, restudy has attracted more and more attention in recent years. At present, most of the sociological restudies are carried out in a particular rural society, especially in some famous academic villages. On the basis of previous studies, scholars carry out further research in order to achieve academic dialogue. In this paper, the comparative analysis of Chinese sociological rural research and re-study is taken as the main body. The four groups of cases analyzed are all works of academic inheritance, namely "Golden Wing" and "Silver Wing", "Lucun farmland" and "Land symbol", respectively. "under the shadow of the ancestor" and "the rank of the region", "the pendulum of the border people in Mango" and "between man and god", compare the methods, contents, processes and conclusions of the four groups of restudies. Through comparative study, we can find that, The further research needs to carry on the inheritance and the reflective research based on the existing research, this kind of research must have the innovation, not only has the new discovery to the social change fact of the research place, We should also pay more attention to the phenomena and problems which the former did not notice or did not explain in the research. Only by using these topics as the starting point of re-study can it be helpful for academic research to carry forward the past and the future. On the basis of this, it expounds the necessity and significance of the re-research model. From the perspective of methodology, it has the tendency of humanism, emphasizes the historical angle of view in the analysis and studies, and pays attention to the influence of cultural factors. At the level of research methods, it lists several specific orientations in practical research, including that the choice of research object is a research point that has been opened up, and combines diachronic research with synchronic research in the research dimension. Attach importance to local practice and research dialogue. Finally, through the above discussion, the author points out that the four research paradigms of sociology all lack the perspective of historical change in the process of guiding the research, and pay more attention to the influence of the social changes on a certain community or social phenomenon. Thus, a new interpretation is proposed. Therefore, the author thinks that the re-research model may have the significance of sociological research paradigm, and it is worth discussing more deeply.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:C912.82

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 费孝通;重读《江村经济·序言》[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1996年04期

2 包路芳;;从村屯到城市——李景汉北京郊区调查80年回访[J];北京社会科学;2006年06期

3 周逸先;;梁漱溟早期乡村教育实践研究[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期

4 李文钢;;“摆”是一种傣族消解社会身份的宗教仪式——读《芒市边民的摆》[J];德宏师范高等专科学校学报;2011年03期

5 张海超;;乡村调查与人类学的方向——七十年后重读《禄村农田》[J];读书;2009年05期

6 丁利刚 ,赵善阳;陈翰笙与中国农村社会学研究[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);1985年04期

7 段伟菊;大树底下同乘凉——《祖荫下》重访与西镇人族群认同的变迁[J];广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年01期

8 石峰;民族志文本的本土实验——评《金翼》与《银翅》[J];贵州民族研究;2002年02期

9 李章鹏;;20世纪二三十年代陈翰笙农村调查的历史考察[J];河北学刊;2006年02期

10 薛伟强;;晏阳初研究八十年[J];河北学刊;2006年02期



本文编号:2315745

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/shgj/2315745.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8c6f2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com