朝鲜半岛“中立化论”研究
发布时间：2018-08-23 08:53
【摘要】： 朝鲜半岛地处东北亚核心部位,介于中、日、俄三大国之间。历史上,朝鲜半岛正是由于具有这种独特的战略地位而屡次陷入大国争夺的漩涡之中。从19世纪末的朝鲜王朝到20世纪中期的朝鲜战争,每当朝鲜半岛陷入大国争夺的危机状态时,朝鲜半岛“中立化论”就被推上政治前台,但每次都未能真正得以实施。 冷战以后,东北亚的国际形势有所缓和。为了避免朝鲜半岛重蹈历史覆辙,很多韩国学者以前人的朝鲜半岛“中立化论”为基础,提出了以“中立化”的方式实现朝鲜半岛统一的“中立化统一论”。 本文即以朝鲜半岛“中立化论”为探讨对象,从历史学的视角出发,综合运用国际法学、地缘政治学和国际关系学等多个学科的知识,试图对该理论作一次纵向层面的研究。笔者旨在通过对具体史实的梳理和分析,力求清晰客观地展现朝鲜半岛“中立化论”产生及其发展演变的历史脉络,并对该理论实现的可能性提出了自己的思考。 本文由引言和正文两个部分组成,其中正文主要包括以下五个部分: 第一部分:该部分基于国际法学的知识和定义,首先界定了“中立”、“中立化”及相关概念,并从地缘政治的视角对朝鲜半岛特殊的战略地位以及朝鲜半岛与有关大国的历史纠葛进行了简要的论述和分析。 第二部分:朝鲜王朝末期的朝鲜“中立化论”。该部分以大国在朝鲜半岛力量的消长为分期依据,介绍中日角逐朝鲜时期的朝鲜“中立化论”、日俄争夺朝鲜时期的朝鲜“中立化论”以及朝鲜王室为争取国家“中立化”的努力,并探讨了这两个时期各大国和朝鲜王朝提出“中立化论”的目的、内容及“中立化”未能实现的原因。 第三部分:冷战时期的朝鲜半岛“中立化论”。冷战之初,朝鲜半岛走向了国家分裂,朝鲜战争促使美国提出了朝鲜半岛“中立化论”,旨住韩国的主导下实行“中立化统一”。该部分以美国官方推出朝鲜半岛“中立化论”的过程为主要线索,剖忻了这一时期朝鲜半岛“中立化论”再次未能实现的原因,并指出该理论开始逐渐退出美国官方的视野。 第四部分:冷战之后的朝鲜半岛“中立化论”。该部分结合冷战之后的东北亚国际发展趋势,以新时期朝鲜半岛“中立化论”的内容(主要由韩国学者提出)为依据,对影响该理论实现的诸多因素进行了综合分析,并在此基础上对该理论实现的可能性做出了自己的判断。 第五部分:结语。该部分对全文做了总结,进一步阐明了作者对朝鲜半岛“中立化论”实现前景所持有的观点。 历史上,有关大国首先提出朝鲜半岛“中立化论”,尔后又都未能实行,这其中与中国有着紧密的联系。而未来朝鲜半岛何去何从,能否以“中立化统一”的方式成为“永久中立国”,更直接关系到中国的国家利益。笔者相信,新时期的中国外交一定能更好地适应时代发展的潮流,“与邻为伴,以邻为善”,与朝韩两国共筑和平共赢的睦邻友好关系。
[Abstract]:The Korean Peninsula is located at the core of Northeast Asia, between the three great powers of China, Japan and Russia. Historically, the Korean Peninsula has fallen into the whirlpool of great power contention for its unique strategic position. The "Neutralization" theory on the Korean Peninsula has been pushed onto the political front, but it has not been implemented every time.
After the cold war, the international situation in Northeast Asia eased. In order to avoid the Korean Peninsula repeating the historical mistakes, many Korean scholars put forward the "neutralization unification theory" of realizing the reunification of the Korean peninsula by means of "neutralization".
This paper, taking the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula as an object of study, tries to make a longitudinal study of the theory from the perspective of history by using the knowledge of international law, geopolitics and international relations. The historical context of the emergence and evolution of the "neutralization theory" on the Korean Peninsula, and the possibility of its realization are also discussed.
This article is composed of two parts, the introduction and the main body. The body contains five parts.
Part one: Based on the knowledge and definition of international law, this part defines "neutrality", "neutralization" and related concepts, and briefly discusses and analyzes the special strategic position of the Korean Peninsula and the historical entanglement between the Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers concerned from the perspective of geopolitics.
The second part: the "neutralization theory" of Korea in the end of the Korean Dynasty. This part introduces the "neutralization theory" of Korea when China and Japan compete for Korea, the "neutralization theory" of Korea when Japan and Russia compete for Korea, and the efforts of the Korean royal family to strive for the "neutralization" of the country on the basis of the growth and decline of the great powers on the Korean Peninsula. The purpose, content and reasons why neutralization was not realized by the major powers and dynasties in these two periods were discussed.
The third part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the cold war period. At the beginning of the cold war, the Korean Peninsula was divided into two states. The Korean War prompted the United States to put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula, aiming at the implementation of "neutralization reunification" under the leadership of South Korea. The reason why the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula failed to come true again in this period is analyzed, and it is pointed out that the theory began to gradually withdraw from the view of the U.S. government.
The fourth part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula after the Cold War, which combines with the international development trend of Northeast Asia after the Cold War and based on the content of the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the new period (mainly put forward by Korean scholars), makes a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the realization of the theory, and on this basis analyzes the theory. The possibility of realization has made its own judgement.
The fifth part is the conclusion. This part summarizes the full text and further clarifies the author's views on the prospects of realizing neutralization on the Korean Peninsula.
Historically, the Major Powers concerned first put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula and then failed to put it into practice, which is closely related to China. Foreign diplomacy will surely be able to better adapt to the trend of the times and build a peaceful and win-win good-neighborly and friendly relationship with the DPRK and ROK.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：K312
本文编号：2198539
[Abstract]:The Korean Peninsula is located at the core of Northeast Asia, between the three great powers of China, Japan and Russia. Historically, the Korean Peninsula has fallen into the whirlpool of great power contention for its unique strategic position. The "Neutralization" theory on the Korean Peninsula has been pushed onto the political front, but it has not been implemented every time.
After the cold war, the international situation in Northeast Asia eased. In order to avoid the Korean Peninsula repeating the historical mistakes, many Korean scholars put forward the "neutralization unification theory" of realizing the reunification of the Korean peninsula by means of "neutralization".
This paper, taking the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula as an object of study, tries to make a longitudinal study of the theory from the perspective of history by using the knowledge of international law, geopolitics and international relations. The historical context of the emergence and evolution of the "neutralization theory" on the Korean Peninsula, and the possibility of its realization are also discussed.
This article is composed of two parts, the introduction and the main body. The body contains five parts.
Part one: Based on the knowledge and definition of international law, this part defines "neutrality", "neutralization" and related concepts, and briefly discusses and analyzes the special strategic position of the Korean Peninsula and the historical entanglement between the Korean Peninsula and the Major Powers concerned from the perspective of geopolitics.
The second part: the "neutralization theory" of Korea in the end of the Korean Dynasty. This part introduces the "neutralization theory" of Korea when China and Japan compete for Korea, the "neutralization theory" of Korea when Japan and Russia compete for Korea, and the efforts of the Korean royal family to strive for the "neutralization" of the country on the basis of the growth and decline of the great powers on the Korean Peninsula. The purpose, content and reasons why neutralization was not realized by the major powers and dynasties in these two periods were discussed.
The third part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the cold war period. At the beginning of the cold war, the Korean Peninsula was divided into two states. The Korean War prompted the United States to put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula, aiming at the implementation of "neutralization reunification" under the leadership of South Korea. The reason why the neutralization theory of the Korean Peninsula failed to come true again in this period is analyzed, and it is pointed out that the theory began to gradually withdraw from the view of the U.S. government.
The fourth part: the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula after the Cold War, which combines with the international development trend of Northeast Asia after the Cold War and based on the content of the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula in the new period (mainly put forward by Korean scholars), makes a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the realization of the theory, and on this basis analyzes the theory. The possibility of realization has made its own judgement.
The fifth part is the conclusion. This part summarizes the full text and further clarifies the author's views on the prospects of realizing neutralization on the Korean Peninsula.
Historically, the Major Powers concerned first put forward the "neutralization theory" of the Korean Peninsula and then failed to put it into practice, which is closely related to China. Foreign diplomacy will surely be able to better adapt to the trend of the times and build a peaceful and win-win good-neighborly and friendly relationship with the DPRK and ROK.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：K312
【引证文献】
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 毛吉康;近代朝鲜半岛中立问题研究（1882-1905）[D];复旦大学;2010年
，本文编号：2198539
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2198539.html
最近更新
教材专著
