“菲利普王”战争之起源的建构主义分析
发布时间：2018-09-06 14:59
【摘要】：本文旨在突破将“菲利普王”战争机械纳入美国国内史的传统观点,绕过将其简单定义为殖民战争的观点,尝试从族群冲突的角度,以建构主义的视阈去考察这场冲突的起源。 本文主要采取三种研究方法：1.史学方法收集史料,对中英文资料均有一定使用,包括部分一手材料。2.借鉴亚历山大·温特的建构主义理论,以探寻“菲利普王"战争的起源为主轴,以两大族群的矛盾为线索,建立起文化、权力与主体间互动这三条逻辑分支,从而构成文章的主体框架。3.在关键概念和若干具体问题上借鉴人类学理论,尤其是勃罗姆列伊的“族群”理论。 本文的主要观点和创新之处在于两方面：1.在基本概念的界定上,笔者将“菲利普王”战争的当事双方界定为新英格兰地区土著与WASP两大族群。2.在结论上,本文认为“菲利普王”战争是这两大族群在新英格兰地区共同构成的族际社会体系所建构的结果。该体系的建构作用是这场战争的根源,它包括文化性因素、物质性因素和主体间互动这三个方面。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to break through the traditional view that "King Philip" war machinery is included in the history of the United States, to bypass the idea of defining it simply as a colonial war, and to try to examine the origin of the conflict from the angle of ethnic conflict and from the perspective of constructivism. This article mainly adopts three kinds of research methods: 1. Historical methods to collect historical data, both Chinese and English materials have a certain use, including some primary materials. 2. Drawing lessons from Alexander Winter's constructivism theory, taking exploring the origin of King Philip War as the main axis, taking the contradiction of two ethnic groups as the clue, the three logical branches of culture, power and the interaction between the subject and the power are established. Thus constitute the main frame of the article. Draw lessons from anthropology theory in key concepts and some specific problems, especially Blomleyi's "ethnic group" theory. The main point and innovation of this paper lies in two aspects: 1. In the definition of the basic concept, the author defines the two parties involved in the "King Philip" War as the two major groups in New England: Aboriginal and WASP. In conclusion, this paper argues that the "King Philip" war is the result of the inter-ethnic social system constructed by these two groups in New England. The constructive function of the system is the root of the war. It includes three aspects: cultural factor, material factor and interaction between subjects.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：K712
本文编号：2226704
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to break through the traditional view that "King Philip" war machinery is included in the history of the United States, to bypass the idea of defining it simply as a colonial war, and to try to examine the origin of the conflict from the angle of ethnic conflict and from the perspective of constructivism. This article mainly adopts three kinds of research methods: 1. Historical methods to collect historical data, both Chinese and English materials have a certain use, including some primary materials. 2. Drawing lessons from Alexander Winter's constructivism theory, taking exploring the origin of King Philip War as the main axis, taking the contradiction of two ethnic groups as the clue, the three logical branches of culture, power and the interaction between the subject and the power are established. Thus constitute the main frame of the article. Draw lessons from anthropology theory in key concepts and some specific problems, especially Blomleyi's "ethnic group" theory. The main point and innovation of this paper lies in two aspects: 1. In the definition of the basic concept, the author defines the two parties involved in the "King Philip" War as the two major groups in New England: Aboriginal and WASP. In conclusion, this paper argues that the "King Philip" war is the result of the inter-ethnic social system constructed by these two groups in New England. The constructive function of the system is the root of the war. It includes three aspects: cultural factor, material factor and interaction between subjects.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：K712
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 戴永红;;中印关系中机制化建设的必要性与可能性[J];南亚研究季刊;2012年02期
，本文编号：2226704
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2226704.html
最近更新
教材专著
