论罗马共和时期将军与士兵关系的演变
[Abstract]:The military occupies an extremely important position in the development of the whole Roman Republic, and the relationship between the general and the soldiers, as the main part of the army, is changing with the development of the history of the Roman Republic. From the beginning of the Servius Turius reform, Rome began to implement the civil soldier system. After the reform of Marillo, the relations between the general and the soldiers began to replace the relations between the state and the soldiers, and Sula marched into Rome and created a military dictatorship. The relationship between the general and the soldiers gradually evolved into a naked relationship of interest. With the soldiers no longer serving the country but the generals, the Roman Republic fell into internal strife and eventually perished. This paper is divided into four parts. After the reform of Servius, the paper discusses the replacement of regional ties for blood ties, the destruction of the old clan kinship, and the use of property qualification as the basis for the classification of the people. At the same time, conscription according to property class replaced the tradition of dividing the army according to the ancestors of Curia, so that civil soldiers replaced the clan forces and became the main body of the Roman army. After the War of Vicarice and the battle against the Gauls, Camelus reformed the civil military system of the time, adapted to the needs of the times, and further improved the system of civil soldiers in Rome, for the subsequent conquest of Italy by Rome. Then it established a solid foundation of strength for dominating the Mediterranean Sea. In this long and arduous process of conquest, the army played a vital role. As the main body of the army, the generals and soldiers, who were both Roman citizens, well carried forward the glorious tradition of the Roman nation, took the national interests as their duty, and devoted their respective strength to the great cause of Roman conquest. But with the expansion of the scope and scale of the war, the supply of troops to Rome came into crisis. The civil military system has been unable to meet the actual needs. Combined with great victories and an incalculable influx of trophies, the Roman army was seriously corrupted by corruption, demoralization, and infighting capacity. The Marlorio reforms removed restrictions on the property eligibility of conscription, and a large number of proletarians and Italian citizens joined the army. The composition of the army changed dramatically, and so did the purpose of the soldiers in fighting. No longer fighting for the good of the nation, the new Roman army became less connected to the country, and they tended to be more loyal to their generals, for they could gain wealth and land only if they fought with them and won victory. This laid the groundwork for the establishment of a military dictatorship. In 88 BC, Sullah led his soldiers into Rome and eventually succeeded in occupying Rome with the help of his army and established his own rule. Sullah's soldiers fought with Sullah for many years, and their ties with Sullah were already strong. After Sura's death, the new and ambitious generals bought the soldiers by means of profit in order to win the support of the soldiers, and the relationship between the generals and the soldiers became more profitable. Later ambitious men such as Caesar, Pompey, Octavian and others set foot on the road to power by force. But the soldiers also began to make their own choices in the face of changing circumstances. With the evolution of this situation, soldiers' desires became more and more difficult to satisfy, and betrayal, such as mutiny, rebellion, and so on, occurred repeatedly, all of which seemed natural to the soldiers, and the glorious tradition of Rome was now gone. All that remains is the pursuit of profit, and the relationship between the general and the soldiers has been turned into a naked one.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K126
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王鹤;;辅军与罗马化关系探微[J];北方论丛;2011年04期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 张志鹏;宗教对气象变幻的关注[N];中国民族报;2011年
2 ;缺铁性贫血的谬误[N];家庭医生报;2005年
3 非可;解开“黄毛部落”之谜[N];厂长经理日报;2001年
4 整理 本报实习记者 武建英;甘肃发现古罗马后裔村[N];北京科技报;2004年
5 杨松长;练就应对心理战的素质[N];中国国防报;2003年
6 车华 耿海军;超常规武器发展引人注目[N];解放军报;2003年
7 逸行;不朽的是奶酪[N];人民政协报;2002年
8 江雪;中兴:全面协调越过“大峡谷”[N];中国企业报;2004年
9 雅文;国产手机悄然跨越“卡夫丁峡谷”[N];科技日报;2004年
10 刘国鹏 中国社会科学院世界宗教研究所;意大利学者对骊條人来源的看法[N];中国社会科学报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 张晓校;罗马军队与帝位嬗递[D];东北师范大学;2002年
2 王鹤;罗马军队与西部行省罗马化关系研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
3 董晓佳;帝国秩序的重建[D];南开大学;2010年
4 朱文涛;古罗马与汉代造物艺术比较研究[D];苏州大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 杜毅;论罗马共和时期将军与士兵关系的演变[D];东北师范大学;2010年
2 赵晶晶;罗马共和国时期的爱国精神[D];曲阜师范大学;2010年
3 康凯;古罗马军队与文化融合[D];上海师范大学;2009年
4 王晓鹏;早期罗马帝国驻不列颠辅军研究[D];南开大学;2010年
5 魏晓明;试论朱里安的统治政策与实践[D];中央民族大学;2010年
6 孔金锋;社会转型视野中的罗马帝制研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年
7 郭露;戴克里先的经济改革[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
8 徐蕙;初中罗马史教学实践探讨[D];南京师范大学;2011年
9 方向昆;论土地制度与罗马共和国的兴衰[D];陕西师范大学;2012年
10 王忠孝;论罗马共和国后期和帝国早期的贵族葬礼及其功能[D];复旦大学;2010年
,本文编号:2235495
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2235495.html