俄国外交文书选译——关于“英中藏”西姆拉会议
[Abstract]:In October 1911, the 1911 Revolution broke out in China, and imperialist powers took advantage of the turbulent situation in China to set off another wave of aggression against China. Czarist Russia first took the opportunity to split China's outer Mongolia, and by forcing the signing of the Treaty between Russia and Mongolia and the Sino-Russian Declaration document, Outer Mongolia gained "autonomy" in name, but in fact turned it into a protectorate and a colony of Czarist Russia. Britain also took the opportunity to plot to separate Tibet from China. To this end, the British Government, on the one hand, coerces the Chinese Government and the local authorities in Tibet to hold a tripartite meeting in Simla, Forcing the signing of the so-called "Treaty of Simla" (initialled on 27 April 1914) to create a "treaty basis" for its division of Tibet; on the other hand, The initialled "Simla Treaty" violated the 1907 Anglo-Russian Agreement on Tibet. In order to establish the "Simla Treaty", the British Government made a request to the Russian Government to amend the Tibet Agreement, with the intention of repealing the provisions of the Agreement which were not conducive to Britain. After study, the Russian government pointed out that if Britain wants to amend the Tibet Agreement, Russia will demand that Britain recognize northern Manchuria, Mongolia and western China as the exclusive Russian sphere of influence, and that the Afghan part of the British-Russian Compact be amended. To protect Russia's economic interests in northern Afghanistan. At a time when Britain and Russia were complacently agreeing to exchange notes and recognize each other's rights and interests in Tibet and Afghanistan, there was news that the Chinese Government had categorically refused to formally sign the "Simla Treaty" and that the tripartite negotiations had broken down. The political deal between Britain and Russia over China's Tibet collapsed.
【作者单位】: 中国社会科学院近代史研究所;
【分类号】:K142
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 冯建勇;;1888~1911年英俄在西藏的角逐[J];西藏研究;2010年06期
2 张永攀;;英印以色拉(Sela)为界的“麦克马洪线”变更计划及政策分歧[J];中国边疆史地研究;2010年03期
3 艾虹;李晔;;英俄对中国西藏的侵略与西藏“宗主权”谬论的由来[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年03期
4 张永攀;;1935—1940年英国对藏政策与中国西藏门、珞、察地区边界危机[J];四川师范大学学报(社会科学版);2006年01期
5 柳朸祺;读《被隐藏的中印边界史》书后[J];西藏研究;1982年01期
6 柳升祺;;1929年版《艾奇逊条约集》第14卷何以有两种不同版本?——兼评西姆拉会议(1913—1914)[J];中国藏学;1990年01期
7 冯建勇;;辛亥革命时期俄、英两国对新疆政策的调整分析[J];新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2007年03期
8 宋岳;;论印度成立“阿鲁纳恰尔邦”的非法性[J];中国藏学;1989年02期
9 ;中华人民共和国外交部一九六三年一月十九日给印度共和国驻华大使馆的照会[J];中华人民共和国国务院公报;1963年01期
10 刘薇,张振民;甲午战争期间的列国调停[J];齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1996年04期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 周源;;从涉藏条约看英国政府西藏政策的实质及其演变轨迹(提纲)——兼论“宗主权”问题[A];任乃强与康藏研究学术研讨会论文摘要[C];2009年
2 张志勇;;民国初年中英存药交涉始末[A];中国社会科学院近代史研究所青年学术论坛(2007年卷)[C];2007年
3 俞辛q;李W痤,
本文编号:2239565
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2239565.html