1954年艾森豪威尔政府两次印支“联合行动”计划的破产
发布时间：2018-10-08 07:49
【摘要】： 本文主要以解密的美国对外关系文件集[Foreign relations of the United States, 1952-1954. The Geneva Conference Volume XVI (1952-1954)],以及解密文件参考系统(Declassified Documents Reference System)上的相关材料为基础,努力探求在战后冷战背景下,日内瓦会议前后,印支地区的中越法美英之间错综复杂的关系,以考察美国在印支地区“联合行动”的深刻根源,进一步了解到美国推行全球扩张政策的方式,揭示出其二战后霸权主义本质。通过对这些文件的梳理,可以清楚地了解艾森豪威尔政府的两次印支联合行动,从而更清楚地认识这一时期的美国印支政策。多米诺骨牌效应的出台,艾森豪威尔“新面貌”战略的提出,都毫无例外的肯定了印支地区在美国全球战略中的地位,从支持纳瓦尔计划开始,美国一步步卷入印支地区的事务,而奠边府战役前后,由于法国态度的转变,更使艾森豪威尔政府坚定了承担所谓“保护自由世界”责任的决心,“联合行动”标志着美国更深入的插手印支事务。文件清楚地反映了在印度支那政策方面,美国关于自身利益的种种考量,最后确定“联合行动”后美国政府内部的讨论,法美和英美的分歧,以及美国国务卿杜勒斯为达成“联合行动”的种种努力。 本文分三个部分讨论了艾森豪威尔政府策划“联合行动”的始末:第一部分,主要回顾了艾森豪威尔政府对印支地区的总体政策,交待了“联合行动”发生的宏大背景;第二部分,具体细致的考察了美国策划“联合行动”的经过,指出此次行动计划破产的原因;第三部分是对两次“联合行动”破产影响的解析,美国逐渐取代了法国,成为了印支地区反共的主角。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly uses the decrypted American Foreign Relations File set [Foreign relations of the United States, 1952-1954]. The Geneva Conference Volume XVI (1952-1954], as well as the relevant materials on the decryption document reference system (Declassified Documents Reference System), trying to explore the Indochina region in the context of the post-war Cold War, before and after the Geneva Conference. More? Law? Beautiful? The intricate relations between Britain and Britain are to examine the deep roots of the "joint action" of the United States in the Indochina region, to further understand the way in which the United States pursues its global expansion policy, and to reveal the essence of its hegemonism after World War II. Through combing these documents, we can clearly understand the two Indochina joint actions of the Eisenhower Administration, and thus more clearly understand the Indosinian policy in this period. The introduction of the domino effect and the proposal of Eisenhower's "New face" strategy all affirmed the Indosinian region's position in the global strategy of the United States without exception, starting with the support of the Navar Plan. The United States was involved in the affairs of the Indosinian region step by step. Before and after the Battle of Dien Bian Fu, the Eisenhower administration was even more determined to assume the responsibility of "protecting the free world" because of the change of attitude in France. Joint Action marks America's deeper involvement in Indosinian affairs. The document clearly reflects the various considerations about the self-interest of the United States regarding the Indochina policy, and finalizes the discussions within the US government after the "joint action", as well as the differences between France and the United States and between the United States and the United States. And Secretary of State Dulles's efforts to reach a joint action. This paper discusses the beginning and end of the Eisenhower Administration's "Joint Action" in three parts: the first part mainly reviews the general policy of the Eisenhower Administration towards the Indochina region and explains the grand background of the "Joint Action"; The second part, specifically and meticulously examines the process of the United States planning "joint action", and points out the reasons for the bankruptcy of the action plan. The third part is an analysis of the impact of the two "joint actions" bankruptcy. The United States has gradually replaced France. Became the main role of the Indochina anti-communist region.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K712.54
本文编号：2255986
[Abstract]:This paper mainly uses the decrypted American Foreign Relations File set [Foreign relations of the United States, 1952-1954]. The Geneva Conference Volume XVI (1952-1954], as well as the relevant materials on the decryption document reference system (Declassified Documents Reference System), trying to explore the Indochina region in the context of the post-war Cold War, before and after the Geneva Conference. More? Law? Beautiful? The intricate relations between Britain and Britain are to examine the deep roots of the "joint action" of the United States in the Indochina region, to further understand the way in which the United States pursues its global expansion policy, and to reveal the essence of its hegemonism after World War II. Through combing these documents, we can clearly understand the two Indochina joint actions of the Eisenhower Administration, and thus more clearly understand the Indosinian policy in this period. The introduction of the domino effect and the proposal of Eisenhower's "New face" strategy all affirmed the Indosinian region's position in the global strategy of the United States without exception, starting with the support of the Navar Plan. The United States was involved in the affairs of the Indosinian region step by step. Before and after the Battle of Dien Bian Fu, the Eisenhower administration was even more determined to assume the responsibility of "protecting the free world" because of the change of attitude in France. Joint Action marks America's deeper involvement in Indosinian affairs. The document clearly reflects the various considerations about the self-interest of the United States regarding the Indochina policy, and finalizes the discussions within the US government after the "joint action", as well as the differences between France and the United States and between the United States and the United States. And Secretary of State Dulles's efforts to reach a joint action. This paper discusses the beginning and end of the Eisenhower Administration's "Joint Action" in three parts: the first part mainly reviews the general policy of the Eisenhower Administration towards the Indochina region and explains the grand background of the "Joint Action"; The second part, specifically and meticulously examines the process of the United States planning "joint action", and points out the reasons for the bankruptcy of the action plan. The third part is an analysis of the impact of the two "joint actions" bankruptcy. The United States has gradually replaced France. Became the main role of the Indochina anti-communist region.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：K712.54
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 刘雄;艾森豪威尔政府亚洲政策的形成[J];东北师大学报;2001年03期
2 刘东明;艾森豪威尔政府策划军事干涉奠边府战役始末[J];东北师大学报;2005年03期
3 赵慧君;国内对1954年日内瓦会议恢复印支和平问题的研究[J];东南亚纵横;2003年08期
4 文庄;;我所经历的1954年日内瓦会议[J];党史博览;2005年12期
5 刘东明;新中国成立和朝鲜战争爆发对美国越南政策的影响[J];历史教学;2005年04期
6 王耀东;艾森豪威尔时期美国的对越政策[J];辽宁师范大学学报;1995年03期
7 姜桂石,刘会清;50年代美国对东亚和东南亚政策的调整[J];内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版);2003年02期
8 潘一宁;美国对第一次印度支那战争的反应[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);1999年04期
9 王琛;奠边府战役——艾森豪威尔政府为何不出兵干预?[J];郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘东明;从罗斯福到艾森豪威尔1940—1954年美国的越南政策[D];首都师范大学;2002年
，本文编号：2255986
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2255986.html
最近更新
教材专著
