清代前期朝鲜围绕“仁祖反正”展开的书籍辩诬

发布时间：2018-10-10 12:54

【摘要】：清代前期,朝鲜围绕"仁祖反正"展开的书籍辩诬,表面上是以晚明野史《十六朝广汇纪》等书为论战对象,实质上是以清修《明史》为假想敌,与清朝纂修《明史》的进程相始终。一方面,朝鲜的书籍辩诬体现出国王对现实王权正统性的诉求,经历了一个由争论到践行的过程,其原因除了其对野史和正史的态度不同及强烈的华夷观念外,更重要的是受国内政治斗争和国际局势变化的影响,其背后反映的是朝鲜对清朝历史书写权的承认,透露出清代前期朝鲜已开始自觉加入清朝主导的东亚朝贡体系并对之产生某种认同。另一方面,清朝对朝鲜辩诬的反应也经历了一个由怀疑试探到顺应请求的过程,清朝以此为契机,抓住了朝鲜的软肋和把柄,将之作为政治性的杠杆进行调节和利用,最后在《明史》中不惜改变真实记载,以维护和巩固两国间的宗藩关系。
[Abstract]:In the early Qing Dynasty, North Korea argued and framed the books around "Renzu anyway", ostensibly regarding the field history of the late Ming Dynasty < the Guanghui period of the Sixteen dynasties] as the object of controversy, and in essence taking the Qing Dynasty as the imaginary enemy in revising the Ming Dynasty. And the Qing Dynasty compilation of the Ming History of the process has always been. On the one hand, North Korea's book defense shows the king's demand for the real Wang Quan's orthodoxy, and goes through a process from argument to practice, which is due to his different attitudes to the history of the wild and the real history and the strong idea of China. What is more important is the influence of domestic political struggles and changes in the international situation, which reflects the DPRK's recognition of the right to write the history of the Qing Dynasty. It was revealed that North Korea had consciously joined the East Asian tributary system dominated by the Qing Dynasty in the early Qing Dynasty and had some recognition of it. On the other hand, the reaction of the Qing Dynasty to the North Korean defense and falsehood also experienced a process from suspicion to response to the request. The Qing Dynasty took this opportunity to seize the soft rib and handle of the DPRK, and used it as a political lever to regulate and utilize it. Finally, in the History of the Ming Dynasty, the true records were changed to maintain and consolidate the suzerainty-vassal relationship between the two countries.
【作者单位】：复旦大学历史系;
【分类号】：K249;K312

【相似文献】