后冷战时代美国政府外交决策中的媒体因素
[Abstract]:The formulation and implementation of a country's diplomatic decision is closely related to its own political system. As the only superpower in the world today, the diplomatic decision of the United States is also influenced by domestic politics. Because the political system of the United States is based on the framework of constitutionalism, separation of powers and federalism, the diplomatic decision-making of the United States is a very complicated process. It is directly dependent on the decision-making levels of the President, Congress, and the State Department at the same time. It is also indirectly influenced by political parties, interest groups and media opinion. This paper mainly discusses the influence of media factors on American diplomatic decisions. The preface mainly describes the significance of the topic, the research ideas and the current research situation at home and abroad, and briefly introduces some concepts. The main body part includes three aspects. The first part introduces the development of contemporary American media. After the Cold War, with the implementation of neoliberal policies and the development of information technology, the era of global communication began to come. Under the background of this era, transnational media groups began to emerge and get unprecedented development, and the global communication system with the United States as the core gradually established. As the "fourth power" organization of the United States, the news media has gained a new round of development in the tide of globalization. Its scale is unprecedented in terms of quantity, type, number of employees and radiation range. In its long history of development, the American media has shown distinct characteristics of collectivization, privatization, commercialization and independence. These characteristics not only determine the main contents and values of media reports, but also influence their interaction with the government. As a result, it directly affects the operation mechanism of American media. The second part mainly analyzes the role and mode of American media participating in government diplomatic decision. The formulation and implementation of American foreign policy is a very complicated game process, so scholars usually use funnel image to explain the influence of different levels on diplomatic decision-making. The special status and rank of the media has given it the role of a messenger, a signal guide and a policy advocate in foreign policy decisions, through the dissemination of international news. Guiding public opinion and publicizing government policies to influence the government's foreign policy agenda and results. With the development of new media technology, television has gradually become the main channel for ordinary American families to obtain information, so TV diplomacy has become a direct way for media to participate in government diplomatic decisions. In addition, through public opinion polls and social reviews, the media can reflect the views and attitudes of the public and think tanks on certain policies, indirectly influencing the government's decision making. The third part mainly discusses the influence and limitation of American media on government diplomatic decision. The media's function of "making news" and "explaining news" makes it have powerful information power, which has an important influence on the government's diplomatic decision. The spread of media information affects the issues, processes, speed, and levels of diplomatic decision-making. On the one hand, the media can set the government agenda and improve the decision-making level; on the other hand, the media can also shape the guidance of public opinion and promote the implementation of decision-making. However, the influence of the media on the government's diplomatic decision is the result of the comprehensive action of many elements, so the influence is full of uncertainty and limitation. It is the complex nature of the relationship, such as the legitimacy of the media influencing diplomatic decisions, whether the media can exert its influence at the critical time, and the government's attempts to control the media, which often limit the role of the media.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:K712.54
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵积旭;李卓娇;;中国现代化外交决策中的两个微观因素[J];群文天地;2011年02期
2 李荟芹;;清末总理衙门的外交决策地位探析[J];昌吉学院学报;2009年03期
3 秦亚青;;中国文化及其对外交决策的影响[J];决策与信息;2011年11期
4 张勇;;对中国援助坦赞铁路的历史考察[J];聊城大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期
5 徐红霞,单秀丽,李丽佳;透视国际关系中的文化因素[J];国际关系学院学报;2005年03期
6 丁英胜;;从战前英德的外交看绥靖政策与二战的爆发[J];世纪桥;2009年21期
7 左双文;;一二·八事变与国民政府的外交决策[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
8 张连红;国民政府战时外交决策机制初探[J];近代史研究;1997年02期
9 沈自成;;美国英语发展的政治痕迹初探[J];皖西学院学报;2008年06期
10 鹿锡俊;;蒋介石对《苏德互不侵犯条约》的反应[J];近代史研究;2011年03期
相关会议论文 前9条
1 叶江;;试论“建设和谐世界”与科学发展观的相互关系[A];和谐世界 和平发展与文明多样性——上海市社会科学界第四届学术年会文集(2006年度)(世界经济·国际政治·国际关系学科卷)[C];2006年
2 孙颖;;军控核查技术研究综述[A];中国工程物理研究院科技年报(1999)[C];1999年
3 尹继武;;认知心理学之于国际关系研究:进步及其问题[A];国际关系理论:前沿与热点——2006年博士论坛[C];2006年
4 郭伟伟;;从内政与外交互动的角度看新中国的外交战略与国内经济建设的发展[A];改革开放与当代世界社会主义学术研讨会暨当代世界社会主义专业委员会2008年年会论文集[C];2008年
5 周斌;;从对日经济绝交到经济援助——1923年为收回旅顺、大连的国民外交述评[A];中国社会科学院近代史研究所青年学术论坛2004年卷[C];2004年
6 郜非非;;新中国六十年外交战略发展过程及启示[A];提高领导科学发展能力暨纪念新中国成立60周年理论研讨会论文集[C];2009年
7 周斌;;再论五卅惨案“十三条”交涉条件的提出[A];中国社会科学院近代史研究所青年学术论坛(2008年卷)[C];2009年
8 陆天鹤;陆天华;;探《涉江》《哀郢》之作时、作地与作因——兼论《怀沙》和《悲回风》[A];中国楚辞学(第十三辑)——2007年中国溆浦屈原及楚辞学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
9 汪舒明;;犹太人在美国政治影响力提升的原因和经验[A];第九届中国世界民族学会会员代表大会暨学术讨论会论文集下册[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 北京外国语大学英语学院副教授 谢韬;从债务危机看美国政治体制的精神分裂症[N];经济观察报;2011年
2 胡美翅 国际关系学院国际政治系;外交决策面临新课题[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
3 唐小松;网络外交——挑战传统外交决策模式[N];中国国防报;2008年
4 杜鹃;与希拉里“竞炫”外交,奥巴马以“海归”自傲[N];新华每日电讯;2007年
5 胡贲;“政治童话”到了梦醒的时候[N];21世纪经济报道;2006年
6 本报首席记者 朱幸福;华盛顿上演“鹰还巢”[N];文汇报;2007年
7 本报驻外记者 马小宁 陈一鸣 吴成良 孙天仁;美债闹剧重创美国信誉[N];人民日报;2011年
8 叶建国;小泉背后的经济推手[N];中国经营报;2005年
9 聂寒非;赖斯缘何无意进军白宫?[N];南方日报;2008年
10 沃勒斯坦邋路爱国 译;奥巴马能改变什么?[N];中国经营报;2008年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 叶晓林;中国外交决策支持系统结构研究[D];武汉大学;2005年
2 刘宗义;解析美国对伊拉克战争的决策[D];外交学院;2007年
3 杨捷;美国在第一次柏林危机中的决策研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
4 穆占劳;美国思想库与美中关系研究[D];中共中央党校;2004年
5 任远U,
本文编号:2341840
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2341840.html