英国《谷物法》的废除及其社会根源
[Abstract]:The British grain law was a parliamentary regulation that attempted to control the grain trade for the benefit of producers at a time when grains (mainly wheat, barley, rye, and oats) were plentiful and cheap. After the end of Napoleon War, aristocrats and landowners were faced with the dilemma of losing their interests. Grain laws were used to control grain imports to ensure that domestic grain prices were running at high levels. The process and influence of this practice are incompatible with the ideology of the middle class, and bring profit loss to the middle class, and political repression is opposed by the middle class. The working class, which is dominated by agricultural and industrial workers, also suffers from the high prices maintained by the grain law, and the working class is strongly opposed to the grain law. The middle class and the working class began to fight for the good. After the parliamentary reform, although some of the middle class entered the ruling class, the realization of free trade was still constrained by the grain law, the establishment of the anti-grain law alliance and various activities. Has become the middle class to continue to demand the reform of the social operation of the vanguard. Since the working class was not mature at the beginning of its birth, the anti-grain law also followed the middle class and was often used by the middle class. However, the rapid growth of the working-class in practice, the emergence of various trade unions and the development of the Charter Movement have expressed the determination of the working-class anti-grain law. With the joint efforts of the middle class and the working class, the aristocracy and the landowners had to compromise, the grain law was finally abolished, and Britain began a new era of free trade. This article attempts to start with the conflicts of interests among the various social strata, to understand the actions of the middle class and the working class against grain laws, and the significance of the free trade thought to the middle class as a spiritual motive force. Therefore, the social root of the abolition of English grain law was found in the factors of social structure change and ideology popularization.
【学位授予单位】:天津师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:K561
【共引文献】
相关会议论文 前10条
1 林凤生;;中西绘画的不同风格对科学传播的影响——“李约瑟难题”的一种另类解答[A];2006年上海市科学技术史学术年会论文集[C];2006年
2 蒲国良;;关于十月革命研究中两个基本问题的思考[A];纪念十月革命九十周年学术研讨会论文集[C];2007年
3 刘增惠;石鹏;;马克思论人和自然的关系与建设环境友好型社会[A];北京高校政经、社建教学研究会年会论文集[C];2007年
4 吴建刚;;浅析社会主义和谐社会的内涵[A];北京高校政经、社建教学研究会年会论文集[C];2007年
5 汪琼枝;;传统义利观与马克思主义正义观价值基点的不同旨趣[A];北京高校政经、社建教学研究会年会论文集[C];2007年
6 邢荣;;现代性矛盾的现实根源——马克思的资本视角[A];北京高校政经、社建教学研究会年会论文集[C];2007年
7 许耀桐;;关于不断提高发展社会主义民主政治能力的探讨[A];和谐社会:公共性与公共治理——2004学术前沿论坛论文集[C];2004年
8 刘大椿;;现代化进程中的人文关怀[A];和谐社会自主创新与文化交融——2006学术前沿论坛论文集(上卷)[C];2006年
9 魏永征;;在“一国两制”下对表达自由与公共权力的界定——一位中国大陆学者看《基本法》23条立法[A];全球信息化时代的华人传播研究:力量汇聚与学术创新——2003中国传播学论坛暨CAC/CCA中华传播学术研讨会论文集(下册)[C];2004年
10 李莉娅;叶苗;;舆论引导方式,期待艺术性创新——“开放条件下舆论引导方式”调查与分析[A];2006中国传播学论坛论文集(Ⅰ)[C];2006年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 李震;从认识论到生存论的感性及其审美意义[D];复旦大学;2004年
2 李育红;人为管理研究[D];复旦大学;2004年
3 朱鸣雄;宏观利益论[D];复旦大学;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 谢九华;所有权保留制度研究[D];湘潭大学;2004年
2 肖湘雄;走出小我樊篱,,迈进大我本体[D];湘潭大学;2004年
3 屈宏;近代中国城市女子服饰变迁述论[D];吉林大学;2004年
本文编号:2388211
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2388211.html