不同情绪状态大学生自发自传体记忆的情绪一致性

发布时间：2018-03-12 08:52

本文选题：自发自传体记忆　切入点：情绪状态　出处：《中国心理卫生杂志》2017年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：目的:考察不同情绪状态大学生自发自传体记忆是否存在情绪一致性现象。方法:通过校园招募平台选取情绪状态正常的在校大学生60名,用情绪图片和音乐诱发出不同的情绪状态(积极、消极和中性),被试记录在警戒任务过程中产生的自发自传体记忆,评估记忆的主观愉悦性评价,计算不同效价记忆比例。请2名未参加实验的评定者协商后将记录到的自发自传体记忆的客观效价分为积极、消极和中性3种类型,评估不同客观效价自发自传体记忆的回忆量。实验结束后被试评定当前情绪状态。结果:不同情绪状态下被试对自发自传体记忆的主观愉悦性评价等级差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。情绪状态与自发自传体记忆的客观效价之间交互作用有统计学意义(P0.01),进一步的简单效应分析发现,积极状态下积极记忆的回忆量高于中性状态下积极记忆的回忆量[(6.3±5.5)vs.(2.8±2.2),P0.01];在消极记忆和中性记忆的回忆中,不同情绪状态下记忆的回忆量间差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。被试评定的积极和消极记忆比例与实验结束后的情绪状态均无统计学意义相关(r=0.29、-0.13,均P0.05)。结论:本研究提示,不同情绪状态大学生自发自传体记忆不存在情绪一致性现象,即使处于消极情绪状态,其自发自传体记忆也会表现出一种"乐观倾向"。
[Abstract]:Objective: to investigate the existence of emotional consistency in the spontaneous autobiographical memory of college students with different emotional states. Methods: 60 college students with normal emotional state were selected through campus recruitment platform. Emotional pictures and music were used to induce different emotional states (positive, negative and neutral). Subjects recorded spontaneous autobiographical memory generated during the alert task, and assessed subjective pleasure evaluation of memory. To calculate the proportion of memory with different titers. Two evaluators who did not participate in the experiment were asked to divide the objective titer of spontaneous autobiographical memory recorded into three types: positive, negative and neutral. To evaluate the recall of spontaneous autobiographical memory with different objective titers. To evaluate the current emotional state after the experiment. Results: there is no difference in subjective pleasure evaluation of spontaneous autobiographical memory in different emotional states. The interaction between emotional state and the objective titer of spontaneous autobiographical memory was statistically significant (P 0.01). The recall of positive memory in positive state was higher than that in positive memory in neutral state [6.3 卤5.5 vs 2.8 卤2.2 P0.01]. There was no significant difference in memory recall between different emotional states (all P 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the proportion of positive and negative memory assessed by the subjects and the emotional state after the experiment (P 0.05). Conclusion: this study suggests that there is no significant correlation between the positive and negative memory ratio and the emotional state after the end of the experiment. There is no emotional consistency in college students' spontaneous autobiographical memory in different emotional states. Even in a negative emotional state, the spontaneous autobiographical memory of college students shows a tendency to be optimistic.
【作者单位】：山东师范大学;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“情绪唤醒影响联结记忆的制约因素及认知神经机制”(31571113) 山东省自然科学基金项目“消极情绪记忆有意遗忘权衡效应的认知机制与神经机制研究”(ZR2014CM022)
【分类号】：B844.2

【相似文献】