关系亲密度影响刻板印象信息的口头传递(英文)
本文选题:关系亲密度 切入点:刻板印象一致信息 出处:《心理科学》2017年04期
【摘要】:刻板印象信息常借助人际关系链得以沟通和传递。而沟通是一种社会情境活动,故人们对信息的沟通和传递依赖于沟通的社会背景,关系亲密度是其中的一个重要因素。关系亲密度指的是沟通者间相互依赖和了解的程度,以自我包含他人量表得分作为判断指标。本研究的目的即为扩展已有的刻板印象沟通研究,采用Ruscher等人提出的二人对话范式,通过两个实验探索关系亲密度如何影响人们在谈话过程中对刻板印象相关信息的沟通和传递。实验1中的关系亲密度由自然存在模式建构,共32对同性别被试参与;实验2中的关系亲密度由RCIT三阶段自我表露任务实验室诱发模式建构,共38对同性别被试参与。所用的沟通材料均为Klein等人编制的刻板印象信息故事,并使用自我包含他人量表检核关系亲密度。实验均为2×2×2三因素混合设计,其中,关系亲密度(陌生人和朋友)为被试间因素,刻板印象信息的一致性(刻板印象一致信息与刻板印象不一致信息)和故事情节的核心性(核心和次要)为被试内因素。在实验1中,三因素方差分析的结果显示,刻板印象信息的一致性主效应显著,核心性主效应显著,刻板印象信息的一致性和关系亲密度的交互作用显著。在陌生人关系条件下,被试传递的刻板印象一致信息显著多于不一致信息;而在朋友关系条件下,被试并没有显示出这种刻板印象一致性偏差,反而传递了稍多的刻板印象不一致信息。在实验2中,三因素方差分析的结果显示,刻板印象信息的一致性主效应边缘显著,核心性主效应显著,刻板印象信息的一致性和关系亲密度的交互作用显著。在陌生人关系条件下,被试传递的刻板印象一致信息显著多于不一致信息;而在朋友关系条件下,被试并没有显示出刻板印象一致性偏差,反而传递了稍多的刻板印象不一致信息。因此,可以认为人们倾向于向陌生人传递显著更多的刻板印象一致信息,而向朋友则未显示出这种特点。谈话中,关系亲密度影响刻板印象信息的沟通和传递。
[Abstract]:Stereotype information is often communicated and transmitted with the help of interpersonal relationships.Communication is a kind of social situational activity, so people's communication and transmission of information depend on the social background of communication, and intimacy is one of the important factors.Relationship affinity refers to the degree of interdependence and understanding among communicators.The purpose of this study is to extend the existing research on stereotype communication by using the two-person dialogue paradigm proposed by Ruscher et al.Two experiments were conducted to explore how relationship affinity affects the communication and transmission of stereotypical information during conversation.In experiment 1, the relationship affinity was constructed by the natural existence model, 32 pairs of same-sex participants participated, and in experiment 2, the relationship affinity was constructed by the laboratory-induced model of RCIT three-stage self-disclosure task, and 38 pairs of same-sex subjects participated in the experiment.The communication materials were all stereotypical information stories compiled by Klein et al. And self-inclusion others scale was used to check the relationship affinity.The experiments were all designed with 2 脳 2 脳 2 three factors, in which the relative affinity (strangers and friends) was the factor among the subjects.Consistency of stereotype information (consistent information of stereotype and inconsistent information of stereotype) and core of story plot (core and secondary) are the factors within the subjects.In experiment 1, the results of variance analysis of three factors showed that the consistency of stereotype information was significant, the core effect was significant, and the interaction between stereotype information and relationship affinity was significant.Under the condition of stranger relationship, the consistent information of stereotype was significantly more than that of inconsistent information, but under the condition of friend relationship, the consistency deviation of stereotype was not shown.On the contrary, it conveys a little more information about the inconsistency of stereotype.In experiment 2, the results of variance analysis of three factors showed that the consistency of stereotype information was significant at the edge of the main effect, the core effect was significant, and the interaction between stereotype information and relationship affinity was significant.Under the condition of stranger relationship, the consistent information of stereotype was significantly more than that of inconsistent information, while under the condition of friend relationship, the subjects did not show the deviation of stereotype consistency.On the contrary, it conveys a little more information about the inconsistency of stereotype.Therefore, people tend to convey significantly more stereotypical and consistent messages to strangers, but not to friends.In conversation, relationship affinity affects the communication and transmission of stereotypical information.
【作者单位】: 西南大学心理学部;
【基金】:supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(31371055) Humanities and Social Science Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission(14SKB08)
【分类号】:B842
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杜秀芳;国外刻板印象研究新进展[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2004年06期
2 李亚玲;;内隐刻板印象研究的进展[J];社会心理科学;2005年02期
3 佐斌;张阳阳;赵菊;王娟;;刻板印象内容模型:理论假设及研究[J];心理科学进展;2006年01期
4 连淑芳;;想象对大学生内隐刻板印象的影响研究[J];心理科学;2006年03期
5 连淑芳;杨治良;;抑制对内隐刻板印象的影响研究[J];心理科学;2007年04期
6 周丽清;;内隐老化刻板印象的年龄差异及其与认知老化的关系[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2007年10期
7 甘媛源;余嘉元;;内隐刻板印象的研究及动向[J];江苏社会科学;2008年S1期
8 贺雯;梁宁建;;元刻板印象的研究及其进展[J];心理科学;2008年03期
9 安桂花;张海钟;;国内关于刻板印象研究的回顾与反思[J];山西高等学校社会科学学报;2010年08期
10 庞小佳;张大均;王鑫强;王金良;;刻板印象干预策略研究述评[J];心理科学进展;2011年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 房玉佩;杜秀芳;;刻板印象抑制的研究[A];第十二届全国心理学学术大会论文摘要集[C];2009年
2 王沛;;刻板印象与社会情景因果建构的相互影响的实验研究[A];第九届全国心理学学术会议文摘选集[C];2001年
3 何志芳;刘建平;;大学生性别—学科刻板印象的加工模式实验研究[A];第十一届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2007年
4 王沛;杨亚平;;刻板印象表征中的功能性模块[A];第十一届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2007年
5 [ke鹒,
本文编号:1721395
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1721395.html