我国青年文化价值取向及其与心理健康相关性研究

发布时间：2018-04-24 23:31

本文选题：文化价值取向 + 家庭主义　；参考：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：研究目的:1、修订中文版文化价值取向量表,为客观测评我国青年的文化价值取向提供量化工具。2、调查测评我国青年人文化价值取向(个人主义、集体主义、家庭主义)现状。比较青年人文化价值取向和家庭观念的代际和城乡差异,探索文化变迁对文化价值取向的影响。3、探讨我国青年文化价值取向与心理健康的相关性。研究方法:采用问卷调查法对不同人群进行施测:样本一:使用自编一般情况问卷、文化价值取向量表(CVO)和水平-垂直个人主义-集体主义量表(HVCI)调查来自山东、河南、安徽、浙江等多个省份,938名青年人,其中高中生498人,大学生440人。年龄范围16-25岁(18±1.6岁)。男生458人,女生480人。独生子女472人,非独生子女466人。来自城市403人,来自农村535人。样本二:使用自编一般情况问卷、家庭观念问卷、文化价值取向量表(CVO)、一般健康问卷-28(GHQ-28)、幸福感指数量表(1WB)、家庭功能评定量表(FAD)、自尊量表(SES)和领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)调查山东数所高校大学生,回收有效样本436人,其中大一学生111人,大二学生266人,大三学生59人。学生年龄范围19-25岁(20± 1.29岁)。男生213人,女生223人。独生子女190人,非独生子女246人。来自城市学生177人,来自农村的学生259人。同时随机调查山东部分城市父代群体,年龄范围35-56岁(45.3±3.8岁),为保证该群体答题质量采用一对一的纸质问卷答题方式且仅填写一般情况问卷、文化价值取向量表和家庭观念问卷。回收有效样本192人,其中男性93人,女性99人。学历水平:初中及以下60人,高中63人,大学61人,硕士 3人,博士 5人。使用SPSS 19.0和AMOS20.0统计软件,采用独立样本t检验、Pearson相关分析、线性回归和结构方程模型等统计方法整理分析数据。研究结果:1、文化价值取向量表在我国青年群体中具有较好的信效度:探索性因素分析中各条目在其所属维度因素负荷量均大于0.4,验证性因素分析3个分量表的RMSEA分别为0.04、0.03、0.05,数据与模型适配度良好;信度分析中整体量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.89,家庭主义、个人主义和集体主义分量表Cronbach'sα 系数分别为 0.88、0.73、0.84。2、我国青年人文化价值取向的现状:青年人文化价值取向水平依次是:家庭主义(4.16±0.51)、集体主义(3.70±0.47)、个人主义(3.41±0.43);青年人对家庭观念中的家庭责任(3.50士0.82)和孝顺父母(3.88±0.67)认可度较高,对操心子女认可度较低(2.32±0.69);女生家庭主义取向显著高于男生,家庭责任认可度低于男生;独生子女集体主义取向和对孝顺父母的认可度显著低于非独生子女。3、文化变迁对青年人文化价值取向和家庭观念的影响,以代际和城乡差异为文化变迁的指标,结果显示:年轻一代的集体主义价值取向和对家庭观念(家庭责任、孝顺父母、操心子女)的认可度都显著低于父代(P0.01)。城市青年个人主义价值取向显著高于农村青年,对家庭观念中的操心子女的认可度显著高于农村青年人,对孝顺父母认可度显著低于农村青年人(P0.05)。4、家庭主义与一般健康、幸福感指数、自尊显著正相关;个人主义和集体主义与幸福感指数和自尊显著正相关;回归分析显示家庭主义对一般健康、幸福感指数和自尊均具有显著预测作用,个人主义和集体主义对幸福感指数和自尊具有显著积极预测作用。并且结构方程模型也验证了家庭主义通过家庭功能和社会支持的中介作用预测一般心理健康。研究结论:1、文化价值取向量表在我国青年群体中具有较好的信效度,可用于个人主义、集体主义和家庭主义的测量和研究。2、以代际和城乡为指标的社会文化变迁对我国青年人文化价值取向和家庭观念产生了显著影响,青年一代集体主义取向比父代显著减弱,且对家庭观念(家庭责任、操心子女、孝顺父母)的认可度比父代显著减弱;城市青年人的个人主义取向比农村青年人显著增高。3、家庭主义与一般健康、幸福感指数和自尊显著相关;个人主义集体主义与幸福感指数和自尊显著相关;家庭主义能够积极预测所有心理健康指标,且通过家庭功能和社会支持的中介作用预测心理健康。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the study is: 1, revising the Chinese version of the cultural value orientation scale to provide a quantitative tool for assessing the cultural value orientation of the young people in China,.2, to investigate and evaluate the cultural value orientation of the young people in China (individualism, collectivism, family doctrine) and to compare the differences between the generations and the urban and rural areas of the cultural values and family ideas of the young people, and explore the differences between the generations and the urban and rural areas. The influence of change on cultural value orientation.3, the correlation between cultural value orientation and mental health of young people in China. Research methods: questionnaire survey method for different population: sample 1: using self-made general situation questionnaire, cultural value orientation scale (CVO) and horizontal vertical individualism collectivism scale (HVCI) survey From Shandong, Henan, Anhui, Zhejiang and other provinces, 938 young people, including 498 senior middle school students and 440 college students. Age 16-25 (18 + 1.6 years). Boys 458, girls 480. Only children 472, 466 people. From city 403, from rural 535. Sample two: use self-made general situation questionnaire, family concept ask The volume (CVO), the general health questionnaire -28 (GHQ-28), the happiness index scale (1WB), the family function assessment scale (FAD), the self-esteem scale (SES) and the understanding social support scale (PSSS) were used to investigate the college students in Shandong, including 111 of the first students, 266 sophomore students and 59 junior students. The age range of 19-25 years (20 + 1.29 years). 213 boys and 223 girls, 190 only children and 246 children. 177 from city students and 259 students from rural areas. At the same time, the parents of some cities in Shandong were randomly investigated. The age range was 35-56 years old (45.3 + 3.8), and a one-to one paper questionnaire was used to guarantee the quality of the answer. And only fill in the general situation questionnaire, cultural value orientation scale and family concept questionnaire. 192 effective samples were recovered, including 93 male and 99 female. Education level: junior middle school and below 60, high school 63, University 61, 3 master, and 5 doctor. Use SPSS 19 and AMOS20.0 statistics software, use independent sample t test, Pearson Statistical methods such as correlation analysis, linear regression and structural equation model were used to analyze the data. The results were as follows: 1, the cultural value oriented scale has a good reliability and validity in the youth group of our country: the load of each item in its subordinate dimension is greater than 0.4 in the exploratory factor analysis, and the RMSEA of the confirmatory factor analysis 3 subscales is 0, respectively. .04,0.03,0.05, the fitness of the data and the model is good; the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the overall scale in the reliability analysis is 0.89, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of family doctrine, individualism and collectivism is 0.88,0.73,0.84.2 respectively. The status quo of the cultural value orientation of the young people in our country: the level of the cultural value orientation of the young people is as follows: family doctrine (4.1 6 + 0.51), collectivism (3.70 + 0.47) and individualism (3.41 + 0.43); young people have higher recognition degree of family responsibility (3.50 and 0.82) and filial piety parents (3.88 + 0.67), and lower approval degree to worry children (2.32 + 0.69); girls' family doctrine is significantly higher than boys, and family responsibility recognition is lower than boys; the only child collective owner The degree of righteousness orientation and acceptance of filial piety parents is significantly lower than that of the non only child.3, the influence of cultural change on the cultural value orientation and family concept of the young people, and the cultural changes of the intergenerational and urban and rural differences, the result shows that the collectivism value orientation of the young generation and the concept of Family Court (family responsibility, filial piety parents, and worry about children) The degree of accreditation was significantly lower than that of the father generation (P0.01). The individualism value orientation of urban youth was significantly higher than that of the rural youth. The approval degree of the children in the family concept was significantly higher than that of the rural young people. The degree of approval of the filial piety parents was significantly lower than that of the rural young people (P0.05).4, and the family doctrine was positively correlated with the general health, the happiness index and the self-esteem. Individualism and collectivism are positively correlated with happiness index and self-esteem; regression analysis shows that family principles have a significant predictive effect on general health, happiness index and self-esteem, and individualism and collectivism have a significant positive prediction for happiness index and self-esteem. And the structural equation model also validates family owners. It predicts general mental health through the intermediary role of family function and social support. Research conclusions: 1, the cultural value orientation scale has good reliability and validity in our youth group, and can be used in the measurement and study of individualism, collectivism and family doctrine,.2, and the social and cultural changes of the intergenerational and urban and rural areas to our youth. People's cultural value orientation and family concept had a significant influence. The collectivism of the young generation was significantly weaker than the father, and the recognition of family concept (family responsibility, children, filial piety) was significantly lower than that of the father; the individualistic orientation of the urban young people was significantly higher than that of the rural young people.3, family and general health, There is a significant correlation between happiness index and self-esteem; individualism collectivism is significantly related to happiness index and self-esteem; family principles can positively predict all mental health indicators and predict mental health through the intermediary role of family function and social support.

【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】