大学生挫折应对能力陈述性量表编制及结构探索

发布时间：2018-05-07 22:00

本文选题：大学生挫折应对能力陈述性量表 + 信度和效度　；参考：《中国心理卫生杂志》2014年02期

【摘要】：目的:编制大学生挫折应对能力陈述性量表(CSHDS),检验其信效度并探索结构模型。方法:在大学生挫折应对能力形容词词库119词与理论结构模型基础上,编制初测问卷与正式量表。对755名大学生进行初测问卷测查,通过条目分析和探索性因素分析探索量表的结构。对1231名大学生进行正式量表测查,通过验证性因素分析确定量表最终结构模型。采用应付方式问卷(WCSQ)和挫折应对能力自评为效标。选取其中84人1个月后重测。结果:探索性因素分析结果表明,量表由43个条目组成,包括乐观积极、追求卓越、关系寻求、调节控制4个分量表,每个分量表包含3个因子。量表可能存在3种结构模型,验证性因素分析结果接受模型3(χ2/df=2.80,GFI=0.97,NFI=0.85,IFI=0.92,TLI=0.91,CFI=0.92,RMSEA=0.05);4个分量表得分与WCSQ的解决问题、求助得分及挫折应对能力自评得分均呈正相关(r=0.12~0.61,均P0.001),而与自责、幻想、退避、合理化得分均呈负相关(r=-0.10~-0.57,均P0.001)。总量表的内部一致性Cronbachα系数为0.88,4个分量表的α系数在0.75~0.79之间;总量表的重测信度为0.74,4个分量表的重测信度在0.72~0.79之间。结论:本研究编制的大学生挫折应对能力陈述性量表具有良好的信度和效度,可在压力与应对领域研究和实践中作为测量量表或评估工具使用。
[Abstract]:Objective: to develop a statement scale for frustration coping ability of college students, to test its reliability and validity and to explore a structural model. Methods: on the basis of 119 words and theoretical structure models of adjective lexicon of frustration coping ability of college students, a preliminary questionnaire and a formal scale were compiled. 755 college students were investigated by preliminary questionnaire, and the structure of the scale was explored by item analysis and exploratory factor analysis. The final structure model of 1231 college students was determined by confirmatory factor analysis. Coping style questionnaire (WCSQ) and frustration coping ability were rated as effective criteria. 84 of them were re-tested one month later. Results: the results of exploratory factor analysis showed that the scale was composed of 43 items, including positive optimism, pursuit of excellence, relationship seeking and regulation control, and each subscale contained three factors. There may be three kinds of structural models in the scale, and the confirmatory factor analysis results accept the model 3 (蠂 ~ 2 / dfU 2.80 / GFI ~ (0.97) (P < 0.05). The scores of the four subscales are positively correlated with WCSQ's problem-solving, help-seeking and frustration coping ability self-assessment scores (P _ 0.001), and with self-responsibility, fantasy, retreat, and so on, while the scores of the four subscales are positively correlated with the scores of solving problems, asking for help and self-evaluation of frustration and coping ability, all of which are positively correlated with self-responsibility, fantasy, retreat, and so on, while the scores of the four subscales are positively correlated with the scores of solving problems, asking for help, and self-rating scores of frustration coping ability. The rationalization scores were negatively correlated with ru -0.10 and 0.57, all P 0.001. The internal consistency Cronbach 伪 coefficient of the total scale was 0.88, the 伪 coefficient of the four subscales was between 0.75 and 0.79, the test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.74, and the test-retest reliability of the four subscales was between 0.72 and 0.79. Conclusion: the declarative scale of frustration coping ability developed by this study has good reliability and validity and can be used as a measurement scale or an evaluation tool in the field of stress and coping.
【作者单位】：北京交通大学学生心理素质教育中心;海南大学心理健康教育指导中心;北京师范大学心理学院;
【分类号】：B841.7

【参考文献】