熟练维—汉双语者跨语言错误记忆研究

发布时间：2018-05-15 16:10

本文选题：熟练双语者 + 错误记忆　；参考：《新疆师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：研究双语者的错误记忆对理解其产生机制以及验证双语概念表征方式有重要意义，而相比于单语者，对其的研究还很少。本研究的主要目的是结合词表的呈现方式(视觉和听觉)探讨熟练维-汉双语者的错误记忆在不同的加工偏向下有何变化。我们采用DRM范式，设计了两个研究四个实验，研究一探讨视觉和听觉学习中的错误记忆在强调字面加工条件下(测验词语只有在学习阶段用同一种语言呈现过，才能将其再认为学过的词语)能否产生跨语言效应，以及视听两种学习条件下的错误记忆有何差异；研究二探讨视觉和听觉学习中的错误记忆在强调要义加工条件下(测验词语只要与学习词语意思相同，无论是否用同一语言呈现，即可再认为学过的词语)能否产生跨语言效应、视听两种学习条件下的错误记忆有何差异以及与研究一对比有何变化。四个实验均为2（学习和测验的语言：相同语言、不同语言）×3（测验词语类型：学过词语、关键诱饵、无关词语）两因素被试内实验设计，因变量为被试的再认成绩，包括学过词语的正确再认率、关键诱饵和无关词语的错误再认率。研究得到以下结果：（1）在强调字面加工条件下，无论视觉学习还是听觉学习，维吾尔语的错误记忆均存在跨语言效应，表现为相同语言高于不同语言。汉语的错误记忆在视觉学习条件下存在跨语言效应，表现为相同语言高于不同语言，，但在听觉学习条件下不存在跨语言效应。（2）在强调要义加工条件下，无论视觉学习还是听觉学习，维吾尔语和汉语的错误记忆均存在跨语言效应，维吾尔语均为相同语言高于不同语言，而汉语则为相同语言与不同语言相当。（3）在强调字面加工条件下，无论维吾尔语还是汉语，视觉学习条件下的错误记忆与听觉学习的相当；在强调语义加工条件下，无论维吾尔语言还是汉语，视觉学习条件下的错误记忆却低于听觉学习。（4）无论维吾尔语还是汉语，当学习和测验语言不同时，字面加工条件下的错误记忆低于要义加工条件下。
[Abstract]:It is important to study the false memory of bilinguals to understand the mechanism of their generation and to verify the representation of bilingual concepts, but there is little research on them compared with monolinguals. The main purpose of this study is to explore the changes of false memory of skilled Uygur-Chinese bilinguals under different processing biases combined with lexical presentation (visual and auditory). Using DRM paradigm, we designed two studies and four experiments. First, we explored false memory in visual and auditory learning under the condition of emphasizing literal processing (test words were presented in the same language only in the learning stage). Whether it can produce cross-language effect and the difference of false memory between audio-visual learning and audio-visual learning; The second study explored false memory in visual and auditory learning under the condition of emphasis on meaning processing (test words as long as they have the same meaning as the learning words, whether or not they are presented in the same language or not). Whether the learned words can produce cross-language effect, what is the difference of false memory between audio-visual learning and audio-visual learning, and what is the change compared with the study. The four experiments were designed as 2 (language of study and test: the same language, different language) 脳 3 (type of test words: learned words, key bait, irrelevant words). The dependent variable was the recognition score of the subjects. It includes correct recognition rate of learned words, key bait and false recognition rate of irrelevant words. The results of the study were as follows: 1) under the condition of emphasizing literal processing, the false memory of Uygur language has cross-language effect, both visual and auditory learning, which shows that the same language is higher than different language. There is cross-language effect in Chinese false memory under visual learning conditions, which shows that the same language is higher than different languages, but there is no cross-language effect in auditory learning. (2) under the condition of emphasis on meaning processing, both Uygur and Chinese have cross-language effects in both visual and auditory learning. Uygur language is higher than other languages in the same language. Chinese is the same language as different languages. (3) under the condition of emphasizing literal processing, both Uygur and Chinese, the false memory in visual learning is equal to that in auditory learning, and under the condition of emphasizing semantic processing, whether Uygur or Chinese, The false memory of visual learning is lower than that of auditory learning. No matter Uygur or Chinese, the false memory in literal processing is lower than that in semantic processing when learning and testing languages are different.
【学位授予单位】：新疆师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.3

【参考文献】