当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 心理论文 >

柔软的肯定:具身化的风险决策倾向研究

发布时间:2018-06-08 13:02

  本文选题:具身认知 + 风险决策倾向 ; 参考:《四川师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:具身认知与风险决策已成为近来心理学和神经影像学研究的一大热点,以往的研究大多集中于身体的视、听和动作通道的探究,本研究则着眼于关注度较低的触觉具身,来探究其与风险决策倾向之间的关系。我们采用仿真气球冒险任务(BART)作为探测个体风险决策倾向的方法,通过三个组间实验设计来研究柔软的触感体验与风险决策倾向、安全感之间的关系。实验一通过2×2被试间实验设计来研究不同触感体验对个体风险决策倾向的影响。结果发现,与硬的触感体验相比,获得软的触感体验的被试有更高的风险寻求倾向,捏软球的被试在爆破气球数和所得金额上面与捏硬球的被试存在显著差异。这一影响并不存在性别差异。实验二也通过2×2被试间实验设计来研究不同的安全感启动条件下个体对于软硬体验的偏好差异。结果表明,与不安全感启动条件相比,安全感启动条件下的被试对软属性物体的偏好更高,与安全感启动条件相比,不安全感启动条件下的被试对长绒防滑垫和软球的偏好更高,并且更多地选择软糖。性别差异也不显著。实验三则通过2×2的被试间实验设计来研究软的触感体验与真实的安全感是否对个体的风险决策倾向存在相似的影响。结果发现,软的触感体验与安全感产生了相似的效果,在不安全感的启动条件下捏软球的被试和在安全感启动条件下捏硬球的被试的风险决策倾向并不存在显著差异。总之,实验结果基本支持假设,柔软的触感体验和安全感的确存在一定的相互关系,柔软的触感使得个体出现更多风险寻求,这与由它所引起的安全感体验是相关的。后续的研究应试从脑机制方向入手来探讨软属性触感与安全感体验是否存在相似的脑区。
[Abstract]:Body cognition and risk decision-making have become a hot topic in recent psychological and neuroimaging studies. Previous studies have focused on the body's visual, auditory and motor pathways, while this study has focused on tactile bodies with low attention. To explore its relationship with risk decision-making tendencies. We use BART as a method to detect individual risk decision-making tendency, and study the relationship between soft tactile experience and risk decision tendency and security through three groups of experimental design. Experiment 1 was designed to study the effect of different tactile experience on individual risk decision-making tendency. The results showed that the subjects with soft tactile experience had higher risk seeking tendency than those with hard tactile experience. There is no gender difference in this effect. Experiment 2 was also designed to study the differences of individuals' preference for hard and soft experience under different security priming conditions. The results show that, compared with the insecure priming condition, the subjects with the security priming condition have a higher preference for the soft attribute object, and compared with the security priming condition, Under the condition of insecure priming, the participants had a higher preference for velvet non-skid mats and soft balls, and they chose more fudge. Gender differences are not significant. The third experiment was designed to study whether the soft tactile experience and the real sense of security had similar influence on the individual's risk decision tendency through the experiment design of 2 脳 2. The results showed that the soft tactile experience had similar effect with the sense of security. There was no significant difference in the risk decision-making tendency between the subjects who pinch the soft ball under the condition of insecurity and those who pinch the hard ball under the condition of safety. In a word, the experimental results basically support the hypothesis that the soft tactile experience and the sense of security do exist some interrelation, and the soft tactile feeling makes the individual appear more risk seeking, which is related to the security experience caused by the soft tactile experience. Further studies should be conducted to explore whether there are similar brain regions between soft touch and security experience from the perspective of brain mechanism.
【学位授予单位】:四川师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:B842.1

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 叶浩生;;镜像神经元:认知具身性的神经生物学证据[J];心理学探新;2012年01期

2 薛贵;陈传升;吕忠林;董奇;;脑成像技术及其在决策研究中的应用(英文)[J];心理学报;2010年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 柴娅;具身化的风险决策研究[D];暨南大学;2014年

2 杨长华;风险偏好对风险决策的影响:基于事件相关电位的研究[D];暨南大学;2011年

3 禹钰;情绪对成就动机与风险决策关系的调节效应探究[D];曲阜师范大学;2010年



本文编号:1995878

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/1995878.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户51b74***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com