特质焦虑与情绪词加工的眼动研究

发布时间：2018-06-11 18:44

本文选题：焦虑 + 情绪性　；参考：《天津师范大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：情绪信息对人类的生存发展有重要意义,随着认知神经科学的发展,越来越多的研究致力于对注意和情绪关系的探讨。本文回顾了关于情绪注意偏向的四种主要的理论,分别为注意成分理论、注意资源理论、PDP模型和自动警觉模型,以及各自不同的侧重点和研究倾向。情绪信息对词汇加工的影响方面的研究中,大部分是从行为实验和脑电分析的角度来探讨。然而,眼动追踪技术是一种生态效度很好的研究方法,但并未被广泛的应用于这一领域。同时,已有的大部分研究均以单个双字词的形式呈现实验材料,脱离了正常的自然阅读情境。另外,个体的心境和人格因素对情绪信息的加工也往往会产生一定的影响。因此,本文探讨高低焦虑群体,在汉语阅读情境下,情绪信息对词汇加工时间进程的影响。本研究采用2(焦虑组：高焦虑,低焦虑)*3(情绪词：正性,负性,中性)*2(词频：高频,低频)的三因素混合实验设计。焦虑组为被试间变量,分为高焦虑组和低焦虑组。情绪词为被试内变量,包括三个水平,分别是正性情绪词,负性情绪词和中性词。词频也为被试内变量,包括两个水平,分别是高频双字词和低频双字词。实验采用眼动追踪技术,让被试阅读实验语句,追踪记录被试的眼动轨迹,不仅分析早期的注视时间指标而且分析后期的注视指标,以便更加全面准确地分析情绪信息的注意加工过程。在本研究条件下得出以下结论： 1.与低焦虑群体相比,高焦虑群体的注意控制受到普遍的损害。具体表现为,无论对情绪性词汇还是非情绪性词汇,高焦虑组的注视时间均长于低焦虑组。 2.在词汇加工的早期阶段,无论是高焦虑群体还是低焦虑群体,均表现出了普遍的情绪偏向。具体表现为,被试群体更容易探测到情绪信息。 3.在词汇加工的后期阶段,相比于正性情绪,高、低焦虑被试群体均更易受到负性情绪的影响,对负性词的注视时间更长。
[Abstract]:Emotional information is of great significance for the survival and development of human beings. With the development of cognitive neuroscience, more and more researches are devoted to the discussion of the relationship between attention and emotion. This paper reviews four main theories about the bias of emotional attention, namely, the theory of attention component, the theory of meaning resource, the PDP model and the automatic alerting model, and Most of the studies on the impact of emotional information on lexical processing are from the perspective of behavioral and EEG analysis. However, eye tracking is a good approach to ecological validity, but it is not widely used in this field. At the same time, most of the existing studies have been studied. The experimental material is presented in the form of a single word, which is divorced from the normal natural reading situation. In addition, the individual mood and personality factors often have a certain influence on the processing of emotional information. Therefore, this paper discusses the influence of the high and low anxiety groups on the process of processing time in the Chinese reading situation.
The study used the 2 (anxiety group: high anxiety, low anxiety) *3 (emotional word: positive, negative, neutral) *2 (word frequency: high frequency, low frequency) mixed experiment design. The anxiety group was divided into high anxiety group and low anxiety group. The emotional words were included in the subjects, including three levels, positive emotional words, negative emotional words and middle levels. The word frequency is also the subject variable, including two levels, which are high frequency double words and low frequency double words. The experiment uses eye movement tracking technique to allow the subjects to read the experimental sentences and track the eye movement track. It not only analyzes the early gaze time index but also analyzes the gaze index of the later period, so that it can analyze the situation more accurately and accurately. The processing of the ready information.
The following conclusions are drawn under the conditions of this study.
1. compared with the low anxiety group, the attention control of the high anxiety group was generally impaired. The specific performance was that the gaze time of the high anxiety group was longer than the low anxiety group, whether it was for emotional or non emotional words.
2. in the early stages of lexical processing, both high anxiety and low anxiety groups showed a general emotional bias. The specific expression was that the subjects were more likely to detect emotional information.
3. at the later stage of lexical processing, compared to Yu Zheng's sexual emotion, high and low anxiety subjects were more susceptible to negative emotion, and the fixation time of negative words was longer.
【学位授予单位】：天津师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.6

【参考文献】