习惯性情绪调节策略对危机决策的影响研究

发布时间：2018-07-03 00:26

本文选题：习惯性情绪调节策略 + 表达抑制策略　；参考：《江西师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：危机决策是危机事件的关键环节,而每当遇到危机事件个体都会觉得束手无策无从应对。现如今对危机决策的研究重点主要集中于组织层面对危机事件应对策略的讨论上,较少研究者探索影响危机决策的个体因素。危机情境中,当负性情绪唤醒时,情绪调节即刻开始。当人们在日常生活中使用某一种情绪调节策略形成习惯时,我们称这种情绪调节策略为习惯性情绪调节策略。本研究中,采用问卷和实验相结合的方法,讨论习惯性情绪调节策略对危机决策质量的影响作用,主要从危机决策时间、产生新方案率即危机决策有效性评价三方面进行分析研究。实验一主要目的是检验Gross编制的习惯性情绪调节策略问卷对我国大学生的适用性。探索性因素分析显示,中文版的习惯性情绪调节策略问卷具有两个维度,包括认知重评策略维度和表达抑制策略维度,与Gross的问卷维度一致;验证性因素分析显示模型的RMSEA(0.078)0.08、NNFI(0.90)和CFI(0.92)≥0.09,SPSS 21分析显示该问卷的内部一致性系数为.638。表明该问卷具有良好的结构效度和信度,对我国大学生群体具有良好的适用性。实验二中采用问卷和实验相结合的方法,目的是研究情绪变量和习惯性情绪调节策略变量对危机决策质量的影响。研究结果显示:在危机决策时间变量上,情绪(F=15.559,p=0.000)和习惯性情绪调节策略变量(F=4.234,p=0.042)主效应显著,且二者存在显著交互作用(F=6.977,p=0.009);在新方案产生率变量上,情绪(F=5.403,p=0.022)和习惯性情绪调节策略变量(F=4.086,p=0.045)主效应仍显著,两变量之间仍存在显著地交互作用(F=6.384,p=0.013);在有效性变量上,习惯性情绪调节策略存在主效应(F=6.234,p=0.014)。主体的危机决策质量不仅受到自身情绪因素的影响,也会受到环境因素的影响。实验三主要目的是研究危机程度和习惯性情绪调节策略对危机决策质量的影响。实验方法同实验二一致。实验结果显示:在危机决策时间变量上,危机程度(F=11.105,p=0.001)和习惯性情绪调节策略变量(F=5.441,p=0.021)主效应显著,且二者存在显著交互作用(F=4.757,p=0.031);在新方案产生率变量上,危机程度(F=4.324,p=0.040)主效应显著,危机程度和习惯性情绪调节策略两变量之间存在显著交互作用(F=6.360,p=0.013);在有效性变量上,习惯性情绪调节策略仍存在主效应(F=7.437,p=0.007)。总结论:(1)中文版的习惯性情绪调节策略问卷对我国大学生具有一定的适应性;(2)当个体处于负性情绪状态时,习惯性使用表达抑制策略组危机决策时间较长,产生新方案率较少。在有效性评价指标上,习惯性使用认知重评策略组被试对危机决策方法的有效性评价较高;(3)当危机程度较大时,习惯性使用表达抑制策略个体的危机决策时间较长,产生新方案率同样也较少。习惯性情绪调节策略在有效性评价指标上存在主效应。综上,危机情境中,习惯性使用认知重评策略的个体危机决策质量优于习惯性使用表达抑制策略的个体。
[Abstract]:Crisis decision-making is the key link of crisis events, and when individuals encounter crisis events, they feel helpless and helpless. Now the focus of research on crisis decision is mainly focused on the discussion of the coping strategies of crisis events, and fewer researchers explore the individual factors that affect the decision-making of dangerous machines. When emotional arousal is aroused, emotional regulation begins immediately. When people use an emotional adjustment strategy in daily life, we call this emotional adjustment strategy a customary emotional adjustment strategy. In this study, a combination of questionnaires and experiments was used to discuss the influence of customary emotional adjustment strategies on the quality of crisis decision. The main purpose of the experiment is to examine the applicability of the customary emotional adjustment strategy questionnaire compiled by Gross to the college students in the three aspects of the crisis decision time, namely, the new scheme rate, that is, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the crisis decision. The two dimensions, including the cognitive reassessment strategy dimension and the expression inhibition strategy dimension, were consistent with the questionnaire dimension of Gross, and the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model was RMSEA (0.078) 0.08, NNFI (0.90) and CFI (0.92) > 0.09. SPSS 21 analysis showed that the internal consistency of the questionnaire was.638., which showed that the questionnaire had good structural validity and reliability, and The group of college students in China has a good applicability. In the second experiment, a combination of questionnaires and experiments is used to study the influence of emotional variables and customary emotional adjustment strategy variables on the quality of crisis decision. The results show that in the time variable of crisis decision, F=15.559, p=0.000 and customary emotion regulation strategy change. The main effect of F=4.234 (p=0.042) was significant, and the two had significant interaction (F=6.977, p=0.009). On the new scheme generation rate variables, the main effect of mood (F=5.403, p=0.022) and customary emotion regulation (F=4.086, p=0.045) was still significant, and there was still significant interaction between the two variables (F=6.384, p=0.013), and on the effectiveness variable, There is F=6.234 (p=0.014). The quality of crisis decision is not only influenced by its own emotional factors, but also influenced by environmental factors. The main purpose of experiment three is to study the effect of crisis degree and customary emotion regulation strategy on the quality of crisis decision. The experimental method is consistent with experiment two. The results showed that the main effect of F=11.105 (p=0.001) and F=5.441 (p=0.021) was significant in the time variable of crisis decision, and the two had significant interaction (F=4.757, p=0.031). On the new scheme production rate variable, the main effect of crisis degree (F=4.324, p=0.040) was significant, crisis degree and habit. There was a significant interaction between the two variables of the emotional regulation strategy (F=6.360, p=0.013); on the effectiveness variables, the customary emotion regulation strategy still had the main effect (F=7.437, p=0.007). (1) the Chinese version of the customary emotional adjustment strategy had a certain adaptability to Chinese college students; (2) the individual was in negative emotional state. At the time, the habit of using expression inhibition strategy group has a long time of crisis decision making and less new scheme rate. On the effectiveness evaluation index, the habit of using cognitive reevaluation strategy group has higher evaluation on the effectiveness of the crisis decision method. (3) when the crisis degree is large, the customary use of the individuals expressing the suppression strategy is better than the crisis decision time. In a comprehensive way, the quality of individual crisis decision making used by habitual use of cognitive reassessment strategy is better than that of the individuals who use the habit expression inhibition strategy in the crisis situation.
【学位授予单位】：江西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：B842.6

【参考文献】