主角情绪对道德判断的影响
发布时间：2018-08-24 07:16
【摘要】：情绪在道德判断过程中扮演着重要的角色,不同情绪状态会对个体的道德判断产生影响。已有的有关情绪对道德判断影响的研究中,研究者大都通过直接诱发被试相应的情绪状态探讨情绪对道德判断的影响,而没有利用道德两难故事中的人物角色情绪对此问题进行研究,因此本文将利用道德两难故事中的人物(道德行为实施人、被挽救者、牺牲者)情绪探讨主角情绪对个体道德判断的影响。 研究-主要探讨故事中道德行为实施人为主角时,主角决策前的情绪状态、决策后的情绪状态以及决策前后情绪状态的转换是否会对个体道德判断产生影响,包括三个实验。实验-从道德行为实施人决策前情绪状态的角度探讨主角情绪对道德判断产生的影响,采用3(决策前道德行为实施人情绪类型：愉悦组、悲伤组、控制组)×2(道德困境类型：“个人道德困境”、“非个人道德困境”)的两因素混合实验设计,自变量为决策前道德行为实施人情绪类型和道德困境类型,其中被试间变量为决策前道德行为实施人情绪类型,被试内变量为道德困境类型,因变量为被试对功利性判断在多大程度上违反道德的评分。实验二从道德行为实施人决策后情绪状态的角度探讨主角情绪对道德判断产生的影响,采用3(决策后道德行为实施人情绪类型：愉悦组、痛苦组、控制组)×2(道德困境类型：“个人道德困境”、“非个人道德困境”)的两因素混合实验设计,自变量为决策后道德行为实施人情绪类型和道德困境类型,其中被试间变量为决策后道德行为实施人情绪类型,被试内变量为道德困境类型,因变量为被试对功利性判断在多大程度上违反道德的评分。实验三从道德行为实施人决策前后情绪状态转换的角度探讨主角情绪对道德判断的影响,采用5(道德行为实施人情绪转换类型：悲伤转痛苦组、悲伤转愉悦组、愉悦转痛苦组、愉悦转愉悦组、控制组)×2(道德困境类型：“个人道德困境”、“非个人道德困境”)的两因素混合实验设计,自变量为道德行为实施人情绪转换类型和道德困境类型,其中被试间变量为道德行为实施人情绪转换类型,被试内变量为道德困境类型,因变量为被试对功利性判断在多大程度上违反道德的评分。 研究二主要探讨故事中被挽救者为主角时,主角情绪状态是否会对个体的道德判断产生影响,由一个实验构成。实验四从被挽救者情绪状态的角度探讨主角情绪对道德判断的影响,采用3(被挽救者情绪类型：愉悦组、悲伤组、控制组)×2(道德困境类型：“个人道德困境”、“非个人道德困境”)的两因素混合实验设计,自变量为被挽救者情绪类型和道德困境类型,其中被试间变量为被挽救者情绪类型,被试内变量为道德困境类型,因变量为被试选择功利性判断可能性的评分。 研究三主要探讨故事中牺牲者为主角时,主角情绪状态是否会对个体的道德判断产生影响,由一个实验构成。实验五从牺牲者情绪状态的角度探讨主角情绪对道德判断的影响,采用3(牺牲者情绪类型：愉悦组、悲伤组、控制组)×2(道德困境类型：“个人道德困境”、“非个人道德困境”)的两因素混合实验设计,自变量为牺牲者情绪类型和道德困境类型,其中被试间变量为牺牲者情绪类型,被试内变量为道德困境类型,因变量为被试选择功利性判断可能性的评分。 通过三个研究得出以下几个结论：(1)主角情绪会影响道德判断,道德行为实施人决策前处于悲伤情绪状态、决策后处于痛苦情绪状态、决策前后情绪转换为悲伤转痛苦时被试对其功利性判断评价得更符合道德,被挽救者处于悲伤情绪状态时被试选择功利性判断可能性增加,牺牲者处于愉悦情绪状态时被试选择功利性判断可能性增加；(2)道德困境类型会影响道德判断,相对于“非个人道德困境”,被试对“个人道德困境”选择功利性判断评价得更不符合道德,并且在“个人道德困境”中选择功利性判断的可能性更小；(3)主角情绪对道德判断的影响,会因为主角情绪在故事中出现的场合不同而产生不同的影响,也会因为主角情绪出现不同转换而产生不同的影响；(4)积极、消极情绪会因为指向不同主角而对道德判断产生不同的影响。
[Abstract]:Emotion plays an important role in the process of moral judgment, and different emotional states can influence individual moral judgment. In the previous studies on the influence of emotion on moral judgment, researchers mostly explore the influence of emotion on moral judgment by directly inducing the corresponding emotional states of subjects, but do not use moral dilemma stories. Character emotions in the moral dilemma are studied in this paper, so we will explore the influence of the protagonist's emotions on individual moral judgment by using the characters'emotions in the moral dilemma.
This study mainly explores whether the protagonist's emotional state before decision-making, the emotional state after decision-making, and the transition of emotional state before and after decision-making will affect the individual's moral judgment when the moral behavior implementer is the protagonist in the story. For the influence of moral judgment, a two-factor mixed experimental design was adopted, in which three emotional types (pleasure group, sadness group, control group) and two emotional types (moral dilemma type: "personal moral dilemma", "non-personal moral dilemma") were used. Among them, the variables between subjects were the emotional types of the implementers of moral behavior before decision-making, the internal variables were the types of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables were the extent to which the subjects'judgments of utilitarianism violated morality. (post-decision moral behavior implementers'emotional types: pleasure group, pain group, control group)*2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma, non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of post-decision moral behavior implementers. Among them, the variables were decision-making hindsight. In the third experiment, the influence of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was discussed from the point of view of mood state transition before and after decision-making, and the effect of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was studied by using 5 (moral behavior implementer's mood transition) Change type: Sadness to Pain group, Sadness to Pleasure group, Pleasure to Pain group, Pleasure to Pleasure group, Control group *2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma), non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design, independent variables for moral behavior to implement the type of human emotional change and moral dilemma type, among which the subjects changed. Quantity is the type of emotional transformation of moral behavior implementers, the internal variables are the type of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables are the degree to which the subjects'utilitarian judgments violate moral standards.
The second study explored whether the protagonist's emotional state had an effect on the individual's moral judgment when the rescued person was the main character, consisting of an experiment. Moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of the rescued. The variables between the rescued were the emotional type of the rescued, the internal variables were the moral dilemma type, and the dependent variable was the possibility of utilitarian judgment. Score.
The third study explored whether the emotional state of the protagonist affected the moral judgment of the individual when the victim was the hero in the story, consisting of an experiment. Dilemma type: Personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were sacrificial emotional type and moral dilemma type. The variables between the subjects were sacrificial emotional type, the variables within the subjects were moral dilemma type, and the dependent variables were the evaluation of the possibility of utilitarian judgment.
The following conclusions can be drawn from three studies: (1) The protagonist's emotions affect moral judgment. The implementer of moral behavior is in a state of sadness before decision-making and in a state of pain after decision-making. The possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure, and the possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure. (2) The types of moral dilemma would affect the moral judgment. Compared with the non-personal moral dilemma, the subjects'evaluation of the choice of utilitarian judgment of "personal moral dilemma" was more unethical and unethical. And the possibility of choosing utilitarian judgment in the "personal moral dilemma" is less; (3) the influence of the protagonist's emotions on moral judgment will be different because of the different occasions in which the protagonist's emotions appear in the story, and will be different because of the different changes in the protagonist's emotions; (4) positive and negative emotions will be different because of the referent. It has different effects on moral judgment to different protagonists.
【学位授予单位】：福建师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.6
本文编号：2200028
[Abstract]:Emotion plays an important role in the process of moral judgment, and different emotional states can influence individual moral judgment. In the previous studies on the influence of emotion on moral judgment, researchers mostly explore the influence of emotion on moral judgment by directly inducing the corresponding emotional states of subjects, but do not use moral dilemma stories. Character emotions in the moral dilemma are studied in this paper, so we will explore the influence of the protagonist's emotions on individual moral judgment by using the characters'emotions in the moral dilemma.
This study mainly explores whether the protagonist's emotional state before decision-making, the emotional state after decision-making, and the transition of emotional state before and after decision-making will affect the individual's moral judgment when the moral behavior implementer is the protagonist in the story. For the influence of moral judgment, a two-factor mixed experimental design was adopted, in which three emotional types (pleasure group, sadness group, control group) and two emotional types (moral dilemma type: "personal moral dilemma", "non-personal moral dilemma") were used. Among them, the variables between subjects were the emotional types of the implementers of moral behavior before decision-making, the internal variables were the types of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables were the extent to which the subjects'judgments of utilitarianism violated morality. (post-decision moral behavior implementers'emotional types: pleasure group, pain group, control group)*2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma, non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of post-decision moral behavior implementers. Among them, the variables were decision-making hindsight. In the third experiment, the influence of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was discussed from the point of view of mood state transition before and after decision-making, and the effect of protagonist's emotion on moral judgment was studied by using 5 (moral behavior implementer's mood transition) Change type: Sadness to Pain group, Sadness to Pleasure group, Pleasure to Pain group, Pleasure to Pleasure group, Control group *2 (moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma), non-personal moral dilemma) two-factor mixed experimental design, independent variables for moral behavior to implement the type of human emotional change and moral dilemma type, among which the subjects changed. Quantity is the type of emotional transformation of moral behavior implementers, the internal variables are the type of moral dilemma, and the dependent variables are the degree to which the subjects'utilitarian judgments violate moral standards.
The second study explored whether the protagonist's emotional state had an effect on the individual's moral judgment when the rescued person was the main character, consisting of an experiment. Moral dilemma type: personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were the emotional type and moral dilemma type of the rescued. The variables between the rescued were the emotional type of the rescued, the internal variables were the moral dilemma type, and the dependent variable was the possibility of utilitarian judgment. Score.
The third study explored whether the emotional state of the protagonist affected the moral judgment of the individual when the victim was the hero in the story, consisting of an experiment. Dilemma type: Personal moral dilemma and non-personal moral dilemma. The independent variables were sacrificial emotional type and moral dilemma type. The variables between the subjects were sacrificial emotional type, the variables within the subjects were moral dilemma type, and the dependent variables were the evaluation of the possibility of utilitarian judgment.
The following conclusions can be drawn from three studies: (1) The protagonist's emotions affect moral judgment. The implementer of moral behavior is in a state of sadness before decision-making and in a state of pain after decision-making. The possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure, and the possibility of utilitarian judgment increased when the victim was in the state of pleasure. (2) The types of moral dilemma would affect the moral judgment. Compared with the non-personal moral dilemma, the subjects'evaluation of the choice of utilitarian judgment of "personal moral dilemma" was more unethical and unethical. And the possibility of choosing utilitarian judgment in the "personal moral dilemma" is less; (3) the influence of the protagonist's emotions on moral judgment will be different because of the different occasions in which the protagonist's emotions appear in the story, and will be different because of the different changes in the protagonist's emotions; (4) positive and negative emotions will be different because of the referent. It has different effects on moral judgment to different protagonists.
【学位授予单位】：福建师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：B842.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 肖前国;;不同情绪与不同道德自我唤醒对高中生道德判断影响的调查研究[J];广西教育学院学报;2008年05期
2 李付丹;孙睿杰;胡园园;简晓微;;读者情绪和主角情绪对记叙文理解的影响[J];科协论坛(下半月);2010年08期
3 何蔚祺;罗文波;;林德道德判断测验述评[J];上海教育科研;2007年05期
4 丁念友;不同智力水平与情绪状态对初中学生认知操作的影响及相互关系的实验研究[J];心理发展与教育;1997年04期
5 徐平;迟毓凯;;道德判断的社会直觉模型述评[J];心理科学;2007年02期
6 王云强;郭本禹;吴慧红;;情绪状态对大学生道德判断能力的影响[J];心理科学;2007年06期
7 陈丽;张庆林;严霞;张颖;廖祥慧;陈谊;;汉语字谜原型激活中的情绪促进效应[J];心理学报;2008年02期
8 王艳梅;郭德俊;;积极情绪对任务转换的影响[J];心理学报;2008年03期
9 邹吉林;张小聪;张环;于靓;周仁来;;超越效价和唤醒——情绪的动机维度模型述评[J];心理科学进展;2011年09期
10 田学红;杨群;张德玄;张烨;;道德直觉加工机制的理论构想[J];心理科学进展;2011年10期
，本文编号：2200028
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/xinlixingwei/2200028.html
