调节定向与结果框架对道德判断的影响

发布时间：2018-10-22 15:00

【摘要】：Higgins(1997)提出动机理论新视角——调节定向理论,是心理学和管理学领域的新热点。在日常生活中,人们总是面临各种选择,在复杂社会环境中人们决策时往往受到多方面因素的影响,道德判断是其中常见的决策。以往主要从道德的发展和道德的认知机制而很少从动机的视角研究道德判断。因此本研究将调节定向理论与调节匹配理论的应用于道德判断领域,富有理论价值和实践价值。研究在介绍和总结调节定向理论、调节匹配领域的最新研究进展的基础上探究调节定向、结果框架对道德判断的影响。研究使用大学生为研究对象,完成道德两难故事判断,采用实验法首先探讨了特质性调节定向和情境性调节定向对道德判断的影响,其后引入结果框架进一步探究调节匹配对道德判断的影响。研究具体分三个实验来进行:实验1A采用纸笔测验初步验证了特质性调节定向对道德判断的影响。实验1B通过回忆报告任务和纸笔迷宫任务启动情境性调节定向,探究其对道德判断的影响。实验二采用2(调节定向:促进定向vs防御定向)×2(结果框架:获得框架vs损失框架)被试间的实验设计,探讨调节定向与结果框架达成的调节匹配对道德判断的影响。分析实验数据后得到以下结果:(1)特质性调节定向或情境性调节定向为促进定向的个体相比防御定向个体更多的采用功利性道德判断。(2)个体处于促进定向时,获得框架下比损失框架下对同一行为判断为更道德;个体处于防御定向时,损失框架下比获得框架下对同一行为判断为更道德。本研究结果表明,调节定向显著影响道德判断,结果框架与调节定向达成的调节匹配显著影响道德判断。
[Abstract]:Higgins (1997) put forward a new angle of view of motivation theory, the theory of adjusting orientation, which is a new hotspot in the field of psychology and management. In daily life, people are always faced with a variety of choices, in the complex social environment, people are often affected by many factors, moral judgment is one of the common decisions. In the past, moral judgment was studied mainly from the perspective of moral development and moral cognitive mechanism, but rarely from the perspective of motivation. Therefore, the theory of adjusting orientation and the theory of adjustment matching are applied to the field of moral judgment, which is of theoretical and practical value. On the basis of introducing and summarizing the theory of adjustment orientation and the latest research progress in the field of adjustment matching, the paper explores the influence of adjustment orientation and result framework on moral judgment. The study uses college students as the research object to complete the judgment of moral dilemmas. The influence of idiosyncratic adjustment orientation and situational adjustment orientation on moral judgment is first discussed by the experimental method. Then the result framework is introduced to further explore the influence of adjustment matching on moral judgment. The research is divided into three experiments: experiment 1A uses paper and pen test to preliminarily verify the influence of idiosyncratic regulation orientation on moral judgment. Experiment 1B explored the influence of recall report task and paper and pen maze task on moral judgment by initiating situational adjustment orientation. In experiment 2, the experimental design was used between the subjects of two (adjusting orientation: promoting directional vs defensive orientation) 脳 2 (result frame: obtaining frame vs loss frame), and the effect of adjustment matching between regulatory orientation and result frame on moral judgment was discussed. The results are as follows: (1) idiosyncratic regulatory orientation or situational regulation orientation is more utilitarian moral judgment than defensive orientation individual. (2) individuals are in promoting orientation. It is more moral to judge the same behavior under the frame of gain than to judge the same behavior under the frame of loss, and it is more moral to judge the same behavior under the frame of loss than under the frame of gain when the individual is in the defensive direction. The results show that the regulatory orientation significantly affects moral judgment, and the result frame and the regulatory matching reached by the regulatory orientation significantly affect the moral judgment.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：B842

【相似文献】